Majmundar Anuja, Allem Jon-Patrick, Unger Jennifer B, Cruz Tess Boley
Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90032, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 26;18(21):11231. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111231.
This study describes key topics of discussions on Twitter at the intersection of vaping and COVID-19 and documents public reactions to announcements from authoritative health agencies. Twitter posts containing vaping and COVID-19-related terms were collected from 1 December 2019 to 3 May 2020 ( = 23,103 posts). Text classifiers and unsupervised machine learning were used to identify topics in posts. Predominant topics included (18.87%), (17.53%), (10.07%), (9.62%), and (7.72%), among others. Public conversations on topics, such as , , , , , and , were shaped by announcements from U.S. and international health agencies. Armed with the insights from this study, medical providers should be prepared to discuss vaping-related health risks with their patients in the era of COVID-19. Misconceptions around vaping as a protective behavior from, and an effective treatment against, COVID-19 should also be corrected.
本研究描述了电子烟与新冠肺炎交叉领域在推特上的关键讨论话题,并记录了公众对权威卫生机构公告的反应。从2019年12月1日至2020年5月3日收集了包含电子烟和新冠肺炎相关术语的推特帖子(共23103条帖子)。使用文本分类器和无监督机器学习来识别帖子中的话题。主要话题包括“[具体话题1]”(18.87%)、“[具体话题2]”(17.53%)、“[具体话题3]”(10.07%)、“[具体话题4]”(9.62%)和“[具体话题5]”(7.72%)等。关于“[具体话题6]”、“[具体话题7]”、“[具体话题8]”、“[具体话题9]”、“[具体话题10]”和“[具体话题11]”等话题的公众讨论受到了美国和国际卫生机构公告的影响。基于本研究的见解,医疗服务提供者应准备好在新冠肺炎疫情时代与患者讨论电子烟相关的健康风险。围绕电子烟作为预防和有效治疗新冠肺炎的保护行为的误解也应得到纠正。