Human Performance Laboratory, University of Salford, Salford M5 4BR, UK.
The FA Group, St George's Park, Burton-upon-Trent, Staffordshire DE13 9RN, UK.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 27;18(21):11260. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111260.
Eccentric strength training can reduce the risk of hamstring strain injury (HSI) occurrence; however, its implementation can be impacted by athlete compliance and prescription. The aim of this review was to investigate the effects of intervention compliance, consistency and modality, on the prevention of HSIs among athletes. A literature search was conducted. 868 studies were identified prior to the application of the exclusion criteria which resulted in 13 studies identified. Random effects models were used to produce log odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Very high (>75.1%), moderate-high (50.1-75%), low-moderate (25.1-50%) and very low (<25%) and <1-, 1.01-3.00-, >3.01-weeks/session were used as thresholds of compliance and consistency, respectively. Modality was also observed. A positive effect on HSI incidence -0.61 (-1.05 to -0.17), favoring the intervention treatments (Z = -2.70, = 0.007). There were non-significant, large differences between compliance ( = 0.203, Z = -1.272) and consistency ( = 0.137, Z = -1.488), with increased compliance and consistency showing greater effectiveness. A significant difference between intervention modalities was observed ( < 0.001, Z = -4.136), with eccentric interventions being superiorly effective. Compliance of >50.1% and consistent application with <3 weeks/session having positive effects on HSI incidence. Training interventions that can achieve high levels of compliance, and can be consistently performed, should be the objective of future practice.
离心力量训练可以降低腘绳肌拉伤(HSI)发生的风险;然而,其实施可能会受到运动员依从性和处方的影响。本综述的目的是调查干预依从性、一致性和方式对运动员 HSI 预防的影响。进行了文献检索。在应用排除标准之前,确定了 868 项研究,结果确定了 13 项研究。使用随机效应模型生成对数优势比和 95%置信区间。非常高(>75.1%)、中高(50.1-75%)、低-中(25.1-50%)和非常低(<25%)和 <1-、1.01-3.00-、>3.01 周/次被用作依从性和一致性的阈值,分别。还观察到了方式。干预治疗对 HSI 发生率的影响呈正相关(-0.61 [-1.05 至 -0.17]),(Z = -2.70,= 0.007)。依从性(= 0.203,Z = -1.272)和一致性(= 0.137,Z = -1.488)之间存在非显著、大的差异,依从性和一致性的增加表明效果更大。干预方式之间存在显著差异(<0.001,Z = -4.136),偏心干预效果更好。>50.1%的依从性和<3 周/次的一致应用对 HSI 发生率有积极影响。能够达到高依从性和能够持续进行的训练干预措施应该是未来实践的目标。