• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估新教师处理欺凌行为的集体效能感量表(TCEB)的心理测量学特性。

Evaluating Psychometric Properties of the New Teachers' Perceptions of Collective Efficacy to Handle Bullying Scale (TCEB).

机构信息

Department of Education, Technological Institute of Sonora, Obregón 85000, Mexico.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 30;18(21):11424. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111424.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph182111424
PMID:34769941
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8583182/
Abstract

Collective efficacy is a promising theoretical construct that has been used to explain bullying rates in school. The development of school collective efficacy scales has increased in bullying research in recent years; however, gaps remain in measuring collective efficacy to handle bullying. This research assessed the psychometric properties of a new scale to evaluate collective efficacy against bullying. This first-order one-dimensional scale is called the teachers' perceptions of collective efficacy to handle bullying (TCEB) scale. A sample of 804 Mexican primary teachers completed questionnaires. The sample was randomly split into two subsamples for calibration ( = 402) and cross-validation analysis ( = 402). The factor structure was supported by confirmatory factorial analysis. Measurement equivalence was confirmed by gender. The latent means differences showed no statistically significant differences by teachers' gender. The TCEB correlation with school environment factors (e.g., principal support, school climate, and bullying) confirms the scale's discriminant and concurrent validity. Our findings suggest that TCEB is a suitable instrument to assess teachers' perceptions of collective efficacy to handle bullying, a construct that has proved to help predict a positive whole-school context and student bullying involvement.

摘要

集体效能是一个有前途的理论构建,已被用于解释学校中的欺凌率。近年来,学校集体效能量表的发展在欺凌研究中有所增加;然而,在衡量处理欺凌问题的集体效能方面仍存在差距。本研究评估了一种新的评估集体效能以应对欺凌的量表的心理测量学特性。这个一阶一维量表称为教师对处理欺凌的集体效能感知量表(TCEB)。804 名墨西哥小学教师完成了问卷调查。该样本被随机分为两个子样本进行校准(n=402)和交叉验证分析(n=402)。验证性因素分析支持了该量表的因子结构。通过性别确认了测量等效性。潜在均值差异显示,教师性别之间没有统计学上的显著差异。TCEB 与学校环境因素(如校长支持、学校氛围和欺凌)的相关性证实了该量表的区分度和同时效度。我们的研究结果表明,TCEB 是一种评估教师对处理欺凌的集体效能感知的合适工具,该构念已被证明有助于预测积极的全校环境和学生欺凌参与。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7803/8583182/5b44333239e4/ijerph-18-11424-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7803/8583182/0660f54bd352/ijerph-18-11424-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7803/8583182/5b44333239e4/ijerph-18-11424-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7803/8583182/0660f54bd352/ijerph-18-11424-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7803/8583182/5b44333239e4/ijerph-18-11424-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating Psychometric Properties of the New Teachers' Perceptions of Collective Efficacy to Handle Bullying Scale (TCEB).评估新教师处理欺凌行为的集体效能感量表(TCEB)的心理测量学特性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 30;18(21):11424. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111424.
2
Teacher victimization and teachers' subjective well-being: Does school climate matter?教师受虐与教师主观幸福感:学校氛围重要吗?
Aggress Behav. 2022 Jul;48(4):379-392. doi: 10.1002/ab.22030. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
3
The relationship between teachers' disciplinary practices and school bullying and students' satisfaction with school: The moderated mediation effects of sex and school belonging.教师纪律实践与学校欺凌和学生对学校满意度的关系:性别和学校归属感的调节中介效应。
PLoS One. 2024 May 28;19(5):e0303466. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303466. eCollection 2024.
4
Are school policies focused on sexual orientation and gender identity associated with less bullying? Teachers' perspectives.关注性取向和性别认同的学校政策是否与较少的欺凌行为相关?教师的观点。
J Sch Psychol. 2016 Feb;54:29-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2015.10.005. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
5
Teachers' Responses to Bullying Questionnaire: A Validation Study in Two Educational Contexts.教师对欺凌行为的应对问卷:在两种教育背景下的效度研究
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 9;13:830850. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.830850. eCollection 2022.
6
Initial development and validation of the Multidimensional Teacher Victimization Scale.多维教师受侵害量表的初步编制与验证。
Sch Psychol. 2019 Mar;34(2):244-252. doi: 10.1037/spq0000307.
7
Teachers' bullying-related cognitions as predictors of their responses to bullying among students.教师与欺凌相关的认知对其回应学生欺凌行为的预测作用。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2023 Jun;93(2):513-530. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12574. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
8
Factorial Validity and Measurement Invariance of the Principal Leadership Questionnaire in Greek Educational Context.《希腊教育背景下主要领导力问卷的因子有效性和测量不变性》
Psychol Rep. 2022 Aug;125(4):2292-2311. doi: 10.1177/00332941211009130. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
9
Development and Validation of an Unethical Professional Behavior Tendencies Scale for Student Teachers.学生教师不道德职业行为倾向量表的编制与验证
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 2;12:770681. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.770681. eCollection 2021.
10
Teacher efficacy and pupil behaviour: the structure of teachers' individual and collective beliefs and their relationship with numbers of pupils excluded from school.教师效能感与学生行为:教师个体和集体信念的结构及其与被学校开除学生人数的关系。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2012 Dec;82(Pt 4):564-84. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02046.x. Epub 2011 Aug 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Collective Efficacy Scale Short-Form in Chilean teachers.智利教师集体效能感量表简版的心理测量特性
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 13;13:935578. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.935578. eCollection 2022.
2
Perceived Collective School Efficacy Mediates the Organizational Justice Effect in Teachers' Subjective Well-Being.教师组织公平感对其主观幸福感的影响:感知集体效能的中介作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 2;19(17):10963. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710963.

本文引用的文献

1
Global variation in the prevalence of bullying victimisation amongst adolescents: Role of peer and parental supports.青少年中受欺凌受害者患病率的全球差异:同伴和父母支持的作用。
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Feb 17;20:100276. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100276. eCollection 2020 Mar.
2
Understanding Teachers' Responses to Enactments of Sexual and Gender Stigma at School.理解教师对学校中性别与性取向污名化行为的反应。
Teach Teach Educ. 2015 May;48:34-43. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2015.02.002. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
3
The Teacher's Role in Preventing Bullying.
教师在预防欺凌中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 14;10:1830. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01830. eCollection 2019.
4
Individual and Classroom Social-Cognitive Processes in Bullying: A Short-Term Longitudinal Multilevel Study.欺凌行为中的个体与课堂社会认知过程:一项短期纵向多层次研究
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 31;10:1752. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01752. eCollection 2019.
5
School Collective Efficacy and Bullying Behaviour: A Multilevel Study.学校集体效能与欺凌行为:一项多层次研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Dec 20;14(12):1607. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14121607.
6
Measurement Invariance Conventions and Reporting: The State of the Art and Future Directions for Psychological Research.测量不变性的惯例与报告:心理学研究的现状与未来方向
Dev Rev. 2016 Sep;41:71-90. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
7
Understanding the psychology of bullying: Moving toward a social-ecological diathesis-stress model.理解霸凌心理:迈向社会生态素质-压力模型
Am Psychol. 2015 May-Jun;70(4):344-53. doi: 10.1037/a0038929.
8
The moderating effects of school climate on bullying prevention efforts.学校氛围对欺凌预防工作的调节作用。
Sch Psychol Q. 2014 Sep;29(3):306-319. doi: 10.1037/spq0000073. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
9
Individual and collective social cognitive influences on peer aggression: exploring the contribution of aggression efficacy, moral disengagement, and collective efficacy.个体和集体社会认知对同伴攻击的影响:探究攻击效能、道德脱离和集体效能的贡献。
Aggress Behav. 2011 Mar-Apr;37(2):107-20. doi: 10.1002/ab.20375. Epub 2010 Nov 2.
10
Collective efficacy in the school context: does it help explain victimization and bullying among Greek primary and secondary school students?学校环境中的集体效能感:它能解释希腊中小学生的受欺凌和欺凌现象吗?
J Interpers Violence. 2010 Oct;25(10):1912-27. doi: 10.1177/0886260509354509. Epub 2009 Dec 18.