van Gils Fleur Elisabeth, Colpin Hilde, Verschueren Karine, Demol Karlien, Ten Bokkel Isabel Maria, Menesini Ersilia, Palladino Benedetta Emanuela
School Psychology and Development in Context, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Education, Languages, Interculture, Literature and Psychology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 9;13:830850. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.830850. eCollection 2022.
Given the high prevalence and dramatic impact of being bullied at school, it is crucial to get more insight into how teachers can reduce bullying. So far, few instruments have measured elementary teachers' responses to bullying. This study investigated the validity of the student-reported Teachers' Responses to Bullying Questionnaire. The factor structure and measurement invariance were tested across two educational contexts among fourth and fifth grade students from Italy ( = 235) and Belgium ( = 667). Furthermore, associations between student-perceived teachers' responses and students' bullying behavior were examined. Confirmatory Factor Analysis supported the predicted five-factor structure, distinguishing Non-Intervention, Disciplinary Methods, Group Discussion, Mediation, and Victim Support. A partial factor means invariance model was found, allowing for valid comparisons between the Italian and Belgian educational contexts. Significant associations were found between self-reported, but not peer-nominated, bullying behavior and most student-perceived teachers' responses.
鉴于在学校受欺凌的高发生率及其巨大影响,深入了解教师如何减少欺凌行为至关重要。到目前为止,很少有工具能够衡量小学教师对欺凌行为的反应。本研究调查了学生报告的《教师对欺凌行为的反应问卷》的有效性。在意大利(n = 235)和比利时(n = 667)四、五年级学生的两种教育背景下,对该问卷的因子结构和测量不变性进行了测试。此外,还研究了学生感知到的教师反应与学生欺凌行为之间的关联。验证性因素分析支持了预测的五因素结构,区分了不干预、纪律处分方法、小组讨论、调解和受害者支持。发现了一个部分因子均值不变性模型,允许在意大利和比利时的教育背景之间进行有效比较。在自我报告而非同伴提名的欺凌行为与大多数学生感知到的教师反应之间发现了显著关联。