Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada.
School of Public Health and Social Policy, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 4;18(21):11572. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111572.
Numerous tools for addressing gender inequality in governmental policies, programs, and research have emerged across the globe. Unfortunately, such tools have largely failed to account for the impacts of colonialism on Indigenous Peoples' lives and lands. In Canada, Indigenous organizations have advanced gender-based analysis frameworks that are culturally-grounded and situate the understanding of gender identities, roles, and responsibilities within and across diverse Indigenous contexts. However, there is limited guidance on how to integrate Indigenous gender-based frameworks in the context of research. The authors of this paper are participants of a multi-site research program investigating intersectoral spaces of Indigenous-led renewable energy development within Canada. Through introspective methods, we reflected on the implementation of gender considerations into our research team's governance and research activities. We found three critical lessons: (1) embracing Two-Eyed Seeing or while making space for Indigenous leadership; (2) trusting the expertise that stems from the lived experiences and relationships of researchers and team members; and (3) shifting the emphasis from 'gender-based analysis' to 'gender-based relationality' in the implementation of gender-related research considerations. Our research findings provide a novel empirical example of the day-to-day principles and practices that may arise when implementing Indigenous gender-based analysis frameworks in the context of research.
全球范围内出现了许多解决政府政策、计划和研究中性别不平等问题的工具。不幸的是,这些工具在很大程度上没有考虑到殖民主义对土著人民生活和土地的影响。在加拿大,土著组织已经提出了基于性别的分析框架,这些框架具有文化基础,并将性别认同、角色和责任的理解置于不同的土著背景之中和之间。然而,关于如何在研究背景下整合基于性别的土著框架,指导意见有限。本文的作者是一个多地点研究项目的参与者,该项目调查加拿大境内由土著领导的可再生能源发展的部门间空间。通过内省的方法,我们反思了将性别考虑因素纳入我们研究团队的治理和研究活动的情况。我们发现了三个关键教训:(1)在为土著领导留出空间的同时,接受“双重视野”;(2)相信研究人员和团队成员的生活经历和关系所产生的专业知识;(3)在实施与性别相关的研究考虑时,将重点从“基于性别的分析”转移到“基于性别的关系”。我们的研究结果为在研究背景下实施基于性别的土著分析框架时可能出现的日常原则和实践提供了一个新颖的实证范例。