Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Vision Res. 2022 Jan;190:107965. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2021.107965. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
During a visual search for a target among distractors, observers do not fixate every location in the search array. Rather processing is thought to occur within a Functional Visual Field (FVF) surrounding each fixation. We argue that there are three questions that can be asked at each fixation and that these imply three different senses of the FVF. 1) Can I identify what is at location XY? This defines a resolution FVF. 2) To what shall I attend during this fixation? This defines an Attentional FVF. 3) Where should I fixate next? This defines an Exploratory FVF. We examine FVFs 2&3 using eye movements in visual search. In three Experiments, we collected eye movements during visual search for the target letter T among distractor letter Ls (Exps 1 and 3) or for a color X orientation conjunction (Exp 2). Saccades that do not go to the target can be used to define the Exploratory FVF. The saccade that goes to the target can be used to define the Attentional FVF since the target was probably covertly detected during the prior fixation. The Exploratory FVF is larger than the Attentional FVF for all three experiments. Interestingly, the probability that the next saccade would go to the target was always well below 1.0, even when the current fixation was close to the target and well within any reasonable estimate of the FVF. Measuring search-based Exploratory and Attentional FVFs sheds light on how we can miss clearly visible targets.
在视觉搜索中,观察者在搜索数组中不会固定注视每个位置。相反,处理被认为是在每个注视点周围的功能视觉场 (FVF) 中发生的。我们认为,在每个注视点都可以提出三个问题,这意味着 FVF 有三种不同的含义。1)我能识别 XY 位置上的是什么吗?这定义了分辨率 FVF。2)在这次注视中我应该注意什么?这定义了注意 FVF。3)我应该下一个注视哪里?这定义了探索性 FVF。我们使用视觉搜索中的眼动来研究 FVF2 和 FVF3。在三个实验中,我们在视觉搜索中收集了目标字母 T 与干扰字母 L (实验 1 和 3)或颜色 X 方向结合(实验 2)的眼动。不指向目标的扫视可以用来定义探索性 FVF。指向目标的扫视可以用来定义注意 FVF,因为目标很可能在前一次注视中被隐蔽地检测到。对于所有三个实验,探索性 FVF 都大于注意 FVF。有趣的是,即使当前注视点靠近目标,并且在任何合理的 FVF 估计范围内,下一个扫视指向目标的概率总是远低于 1.0。测量基于搜索的探索性和注意性 FVF,可以帮助我们了解为什么我们会错过明显可见的目标。