Department of Environmental Engineering, Kumoh National Institute of Technology, Gumi 39177, Republic of Korea; Department of Energy Engineering Convergence, Kumoh National Institute of Technology, Gumi 39177, Republic of Korea.
Department of Environmental Engineering, Kumoh National Institute of Technology, Gumi 39177, Republic of Korea; Department of Energy Engineering Convergence, Kumoh National Institute of Technology, Gumi 39177, Republic of Korea.
Ultrason Sonochem. 2021 Dec;80:105825. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105825. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
Ultrasonic soil washing processes using organic solvents were investigated for the development of novel remediation technologies for persistent organic pollutants (POPs)- contaminated soils. Aluminum foil erosion was first tested to understand sonophysical activity in water, methanol (polar) and n-hexane (nonpolar) in a 28 kHz double-bath-type sonoreactor. Significant sonophysical damage on the aluminum foil was observed at the antinodes for all solvents, and the order of degree of sonophysical damage was as follows: water > methanol > n-hexane. Subsequently, conventional (mechanical mixing only) and ultrasonic soil washing (mechanical mixing and ultrasound) techniques were compared for the removal of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) from soil. Two types of contaminated soils, fresh (Soil A, C = 2.5 mg/kg) and weathered (Soil B, C = 0.5 mg/kg), were used and the applied soil-to-liquid (S:L) ratio was 1:5 and 1:10 for methanol and n-hexane, respectively. The polar solvent significantly increased washing efficiencies compared to the nonpolar solvent, despite the nonpolar nature of the PCBs. Washing efficiency was significantly enhanced in ultrasonic soil washing compared to conventional washing, owing to macro- and micro-scale sonophysical actions. The highest washing efficiencies of 90% for Soil A and 70% for Soil B were observed in the ultrasonic washing processes using methanol. Additionally, a single operation of the ultrasonic washing process was superior to two sequential processes with conventional mixing in terms of washing efficiency, consumption of washing agents, treatment of washing leachate, and operation time. Finally, the removal of PCBs in an organic solvent (methanol) was investigated in photolytic and sonolytic processes for the post-treatment of soil washing leachate. A photolysis efficiency of 80% was obtained within 60 min of UV exposure for intensities of 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 W/cm. The primary mechanism of PCBs degradation is photolytic dechlorination. In contrast, no degradation was detected in the sonolytic process, as the excess organic solvent acted as a strong radical scavenger.
超声土壤洗涤过程中使用有机溶剂被调查的发展新型修复技术持久性有机污染物(pops)污染土壤。铝箔侵蚀首先进行了测试,以了解声物理活动在水中,甲醇(极性)和正己烷(非极性)在 28 kHz 双浴式声反应器。在所有溶剂中,在声节点处观察到铝箔发生了明显的声物理损伤,声物理损伤程度的顺序如下:水>甲醇>正己烷。随后,比较了常规(仅机械混合)和超声土壤洗涤(机械混合和超声)技术从土壤中去除多氯联苯(pcb)。两种类型的污染土壤,新鲜(土壤 A,C = 2.5 毫克/公斤)和风化(土壤 B,C = 0.5 毫克/公斤),并应用土壤与液体(S:L)的比例为 1:5 和 1:10 甲醇和正己烷,分别。与非极性溶剂相比,极性溶剂显著提高了洗涤效率,尽管 PCBs 是非极性的。与常规洗涤相比,超声土壤洗涤显著提高了洗涤效率,这是由于宏观和微观尺度的声物理作用。在超声洗涤过程中,甲醇的洗涤效率最高,土壤 A 为 90%,土壤 B 为 70%。此外,在超声洗涤过程中,单次操作优于常规混合的两次连续操作,在洗涤效率、洗涤剂消耗、洗涤浸出液处理和操作时间方面。最后,研究了在光解和超声过程中有机溶剂(甲醇)中 PCB 的去除,作为土壤洗涤浸出液的后处理方法。在 1.0、2.0 和 4.0 W/cm 的紫外光照射下,60 分钟内获得了 80%的光解效率。PCBs 降解的主要机制是光解脱氯。相比之下,在超声过程中没有检测到降解,因为过量的有机溶剂作为一种强自由基清除剂。