• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性别归因:当阴茎造成差异。

Sex/Gender Attribution: When the Penis Makes the Difference.

机构信息

Department of Philosophy, Social and Human Sciences and Education, University of Perugia, Piazza G. Ermini 1, 06123, Perugia, Italy.

Myèsis, Research and Development Company, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Arch Sex Behav. 2022 May;51(4):1865-1879. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02152-z. Epub 2021 Nov 15.

DOI:10.1007/s10508-021-02152-z
PMID:34779980
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9192409/
Abstract

The present study aimed to replicate Kessler and McKenna's (1978) ethnomethodological study that investigated how an individual attributes gender to a person. By administering figures depicted on overlays (Overlay Study), Kessler and McKenna found that the penis more than the vulva and the male sexual characteristics more than the female ones were significantly more salient in the gender attribution process. From all this, their adage is: "See someone as female only when you cannot see them as male." Taking as a model Kessler and McKenna's Overlay Study, we administered to 592 adults 120 new digital stimuli elaborated on realistic frontal images of human nudes to verify if the previously obtained results would be confirmed by using more realistic images. We found that the participants attributed male gender 86% of the time when the penis was shown, but only attributed female gender 67% of the time when the vulva was shown. All findings had strong statistical significance, confirming the findings of the Overlay Study that the penis makes the difference in gender recognition. Beyond an ethnomethodological approach, we have interpreted and discussed our results from the outlook of evolutionary and cognitive psychology and cognitive neuroscience, concluding that the cultural stereotypes and prejudices that affect gender attribution might not just be a mere cultural product, but rather the consequence of evolved cognitive biases.

摘要

本研究旨在复制 Kessler 和 McKenna(1978)的民族方法论研究,该研究调查了个体如何将性别归因于一个人。通过对覆盖物上的图像进行管理(Overlay 研究),Kessler 和 McKenna 发现,在性别归因过程中,阴茎比外阴和男性性特征比女性性特征更为突出。根据所有这些,他们的格言是:“只有当你看不到他们是男性时,才会将他们视为女性。”我们以 Kessler 和 McKenna 的 Overlay 研究为模型,向 592 名成年人管理了 120 个新的数字刺激,这些刺激是基于真人裸体的逼真正面图像精心制作的,以验证使用更逼真的图像是否会确认先前获得的结果。我们发现,当显示阴茎时,参与者有 86%的时间将其归因于男性性别,但当显示外阴时,只有 67%的时间将其归因于女性性别。所有发现都具有很强的统计学意义,证实了 Overlay 研究的发现,即阴茎在性别识别中起着决定性作用。除了民族方法论方法之外,我们还从进化和认知心理学以及认知神经科学的角度对我们的结果进行了解释和讨论,得出结论认为,影响性别归因的文化刻板印象和偏见可能不仅仅是一种纯粹的文化产物,而是进化认知偏见的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df7e/9192409/a62d035f94e8/10508_2021_2152_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df7e/9192409/6f1aa9370ea7/10508_2021_2152_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df7e/9192409/a62d035f94e8/10508_2021_2152_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df7e/9192409/6f1aa9370ea7/10508_2021_2152_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df7e/9192409/a62d035f94e8/10508_2021_2152_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Sex/Gender Attribution: When the Penis Makes the Difference.性别归因:当阴茎造成差异。
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 May;51(4):1865-1879. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02152-z. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
2
If there's a penis, it's most likely a man: Investigating the social construction of gender using eye tracking.如果有阴茎,那么很可能是男性:使用眼动追踪技术研究性别建构。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 1;13(3):e0193616. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193616. eCollection 2018.
3
Male recognition bias in sex assignment based on visual stimuli.基于视觉刺激的性别分配中的男性识别偏差。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 17;12(1):8156. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12411-1.
4
A developmental intergroup theory of social stereotypes and prejudice.社会刻板印象与偏见的发展性群体间理论。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2006;34:39-89. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(06)80004-2.
5
Experiment of nurture: ablatio penis at 2 months, sex reassignment at 7 months, and a psychosexual follow-up in young adulthood.养育实验:2个月时阴茎切除,7个月时性别重新分配,以及成年早期的性心理随访。
Pediatrics. 1998 Jul;102(1):e9. doi: 10.1542/peds.102.1.e9.
6
The "Penis Police": Lesbian and Feminist Spaces, Trans Women, and the Maintenance of the Sex/Gender/Sexuality System.“阴茎警察”:女同性恋与女权主义空间、跨性别女性以及性/性别/性取向体系的维护
J Lesbian Stud. 2019;23(2):243-256. doi: 10.1080/10894160.2018.1517574. Epub 2018 Nov 24.
7
Error management theory: a new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading.错误管理理论:跨性别读心偏差的新视角。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Jan;78(1):81-91. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.78.1.81.
8
Gender-related biases in evaluations of sex discrimination allegations: is perceived threat the key?性别歧视指控评估中的性别相关偏见:感知到的威胁是关键吗?
J Appl Psychol. 2002 Apr;87(2):280-92. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.280.
9
Power, gender stereotypes and perceptions of heterosexual couples.权力、性别刻板印象与异性恋伴侣的认知
Br J Soc Psychol. 1995 Dec;34 ( Pt 4):421-35. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1995.tb01075.x.
10
Differing levels of gender salience in preschool classrooms: effects on children's gender attitudes and intergroup bias.幼儿园教室中不同程度的性别凸显:对儿童性别态度和群际偏见的影响。
Child Dev. 2010 Nov-Dec;81(6):1787-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01510.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Male recognition bias in sex assignment based on visual stimuli.基于视觉刺激的性别分配中的男性识别偏差。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 17;12(1):8156. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12411-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Demographic and temporal trends in transgender identities and gender confirming surgery.跨性别身份认同与性别确认手术的人口统计学和时间趋势。
Transl Androl Urol. 2019 Jun;8(3):184-190. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.04.09.
2
Enhancing Psychological Sexual Health of People With Spinal Cord Injury and Their Partners in an Italian Unipolar Spinal Unit: A Pilot Data Study.在意大利一个单极脊髓损伤治疗单元中提升脊髓损伤患者及其伴侣的心理性健康:一项试点数据研究
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 5;10:754. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00754. eCollection 2019.
3
A Neural Network Framework for Cognitive Bias.
一种用于认知偏差的神经网络框架。
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 3;9:1561. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01561. eCollection 2018.
4
Culture and cognition.文化与认知。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2016 Apr;8:105-111. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
5
If there's a penis, it's most likely a man: Investigating the social construction of gender using eye tracking.如果有阴茎,那么很可能是男性:使用眼动追踪技术研究性别建构。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 1;13(3):e0193616. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193616. eCollection 2018.
6
Too real for comfort? Uncanny responses to computer generated faces.真实到令人不安?对计算机生成面孔的离奇反应。
Comput Human Behav. 2009 May 1;25(3):695-710. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.026.
7
Perceptions of dominance following glimpses of faces and bodies.瞥见面部和身体后对主导地位的认知。
Perception. 2012;41(6):687-706. doi: 10.1068/p7023.
8
Generalizability: the trees, the forest, and the low-hanging fruit.可推广性:树木、森林和低挂果实。
Neurology. 2012 Jun 5;78(23):1886-91. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318258f812.
9
Fear extinction to an out-group face: the role of target gender.对外群体面孔的恐惧消退:目标性别的作用。
Psychol Sci. 2009 Feb;20(2):155-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02273.x. Epub 2009 Jan 16.
10
Heuristics made easy: an effort-reduction framework.启发式方法简化:一个减少努力的框架。
Psychol Bull. 2008 Mar;134(2):207-22. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.207.