Psychiatric Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, 613 West Huangpu Avenue, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Psychiatric Department, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 15;21(1):568. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03595-3.
Depressive symptoms could be similarly expressed in bipolar and unipolar disorder. However, changes in cognition and brain networks might be quite distinct. We aimed to find out the difference in the neural mechanism of impaired working memory in patients with bipolar and unipolar disorder.
According to diagnostic criteria of bipolar II disorder of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) and assessments, 13 bipolar II depression (BP II), 8 unipolar depression (UD) patients and 15 healthy controls (HC) were recruited in the study. We used 2-back tasks and magnetic source imaging (MSI) to test working memory functions and get the brain reactions of the participants.
Compared with HC, only spatial working memory tasks accuracy was significantly worse in both UD and BP II (p = 0.001). Pearson correlation showed that the stronger the FCs' strength of MFG-IPL and IPL-preSMA, the higher accuracy of SWM task within left FPN in patients with UD (r = 0.860, p = 0.006; r = 0.752, p = 0.031). However, the FC strength of IFG-IPL was negatively correlated with the accuracy of SWM task within left FPN in patients with BP II (r = - 0.591, p = 0.033).
Our study showed that the spatial working memory of patients with whether UD or BP II was impaired. The patterns of FCs within these two groups of patients were different when performing working memory tasks.
抑郁症状在双相情感障碍和单相情感障碍中可能有相似的表现。然而,认知和大脑网络的变化可能有很大的不同。我们旨在找出双相情感障碍和单相情感障碍患者在工作记忆受损的神经机制方面的差异。
根据精神疾病诊断与统计手册第五版(DSM-5)的双相 II 型障碍诊断标准和评估,我们招募了 13 名双相 II 型抑郁症(BP II)患者、8 名单相抑郁症(UD)患者和 15 名健康对照组(HC)。我们使用 2 -back 任务和磁源成像(MSI)来测试工作记忆功能,并获得参与者的大脑反应。
与 HC 相比,UD 和 BP II 患者的空间工作记忆任务准确性均显著降低(p=0.001)。Pearson 相关分析显示,UD 患者左额顶网络(FPN)内 MFG-IPL 和 IPL-preSMA 的 FCs 强度越强,其空间工作记忆任务的准确性越高(r=0.860,p=0.006;r=0.752,p=0.031)。然而,BP II 患者 IFG-IPL 的 FC 强度与左 FPN 内空间工作记忆任务的准确性呈负相关(r=-0.591,p=0.033)。
我们的研究表明,UD 或 BP II 患者的空间工作记忆受损。在执行工作记忆任务时,这两组患者的 FC 模式不同。