Suppr超能文献

双相 II 型障碍和单相抑郁患者言语和空间工作记忆的差异:一项 MSI 研究。

Differences in verbal and spatial working memory in patients with bipolar II and unipolar depression: an MSI study.

机构信息

Psychiatric Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, 613 West Huangpu Avenue, Guangzhou, 510630, China.

Psychiatric Department, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 15;21(1):568. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03595-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Depressive symptoms could be similarly expressed in bipolar and unipolar disorder. However, changes in cognition and brain networks might be quite distinct. We aimed to find out the difference in the neural mechanism of impaired working memory in patients with bipolar and unipolar disorder.

METHOD

According to diagnostic criteria of bipolar II disorder of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) and assessments, 13 bipolar II depression (BP II), 8 unipolar depression (UD) patients and 15 healthy controls (HC) were recruited in the study. We used 2-back tasks and magnetic source imaging (MSI) to test working memory functions and get the brain reactions of the participants.

RESULTS

Compared with HC, only spatial working memory tasks accuracy was significantly worse in both UD and BP II (p = 0.001). Pearson correlation showed that the stronger the FCs' strength of MFG-IPL and IPL-preSMA, the higher accuracy of SWM task within left FPN in patients with UD (r = 0.860, p = 0.006; r = 0.752, p = 0.031). However, the FC strength of IFG-IPL was negatively correlated with the accuracy of SWM task within left FPN in patients with BP II (r = - 0.591, p = 0.033).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that the spatial working memory of patients with whether UD or BP II was impaired. The patterns of FCs within these two groups of patients were different when performing working memory tasks.

摘要

背景

抑郁症状在双相情感障碍和单相情感障碍中可能有相似的表现。然而,认知和大脑网络的变化可能有很大的不同。我们旨在找出双相情感障碍和单相情感障碍患者在工作记忆受损的神经机制方面的差异。

方法

根据精神疾病诊断与统计手册第五版(DSM-5)的双相 II 型障碍诊断标准和评估,我们招募了 13 名双相 II 型抑郁症(BP II)患者、8 名单相抑郁症(UD)患者和 15 名健康对照组(HC)。我们使用 2 -back 任务和磁源成像(MSI)来测试工作记忆功能,并获得参与者的大脑反应。

结果

与 HC 相比,UD 和 BP II 患者的空间工作记忆任务准确性均显著降低(p=0.001)。Pearson 相关分析显示,UD 患者左额顶网络(FPN)内 MFG-IPL 和 IPL-preSMA 的 FCs 强度越强,其空间工作记忆任务的准确性越高(r=0.860,p=0.006;r=0.752,p=0.031)。然而,BP II 患者 IFG-IPL 的 FC 强度与左 FPN 内空间工作记忆任务的准确性呈负相关(r=-0.591,p=0.033)。

结论

我们的研究表明,UD 或 BP II 患者的空间工作记忆受损。在执行工作记忆任务时,这两组患者的 FC 模式不同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e24/8594073/1b5f2e736d30/12888_2021_3595_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验