Department of Clinical Laboratory, Fujita Health University Okazaki Medical Center, Okazaki, Japan.
Department of Microbiology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan.
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Dec 22;9(3):e0160821. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.01608-21. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
Rapid detection and reporting of carbapenemase-producing (CPE) is one of the top priorities of clinical microbiology laboratories. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute recommends the modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) as the preferred method for this purpose, but it requires a broth incubation process which can be cumbersome. Here, we compared the performance of mCIM with three alternative rapid CPE detection methods against a collection of genetically defined CPE, with most carrying , and non-CPE clinical isolates. The sensitivities of mCIM, simplified carbapenem inactivation method (sCIM), Rapidec Carba NP, and NG-Test Carba 5 were 98.0%, 54.9%, 90.2%, and 72.5%, whereas the specificities were 89.5%, 84.2%, 89.5%, and 100%, respectively. Modification of the interpretive criteria of sCIM increased its sensitivity to 88.2% and specificity to 89.5%. The results suggest that mCIM is currently the optimal method for CPE detection in an epidemiological setting where CPE-producing IMP group carbapenemase is predominant. While sCIM is easier to perform, it requires further validation before it can be widely adopted as an alternative to mCIM in the clinical laboratory. Simple identification methods for carbapenemase-producing are required for the clinical laboratory. The simplified carbapenem inactivation method (sCIM) is a carbapenemase detection method that can be performed with less hands-on time than mCIM, but its sensitivity and specificity were suboptimal compared with other phenotypic detection methods when tested against a collection of IMP-producing CPE. Insufficient inactivation of imipenem from inadequate inoculation was suspected as the cause. While sCIM is easier to perform, it requires optimization before it can be widely adopted as an alternative to mCIM in the clinical laboratory.
快速检测和报告碳青霉烯酶产生菌(CPE)是临床微生物学实验室的首要任务之一。临床和实验室标准研究所推荐改良碳青霉烯失活法(mCIM)作为首选方法,但它需要进行肉汤孵育过程,这可能很繁琐。在这里,我们比较了 mCIM 与三种替代快速 CPE 检测方法在一组遗传定义的 CPE 中的性能,其中大多数携带和非 CPE 临床分离株。mCIM、简化碳青霉烯失活法(sCIM)、Rapidec Carba NP 和 NG-Test Carba 5 的灵敏度分别为 98.0%、54.9%、90.2%和 72.5%,而特异性分别为 89.5%、84.2%、89.5%和 100%。sCIM 解释标准的修改将其灵敏度提高到 88.2%,特异性提高到 89.5%。结果表明,mCIM 是目前在流行病学环境中检测 CPE 的最佳方法,因为产 IMP 组碳青霉烯酶的 CPE 占主导地位。虽然 sCIM 更容易操作,但在广泛应用于临床实验室之前,还需要进一步验证。临床实验室需要简单的碳青霉烯酶产生菌鉴定方法。简化碳青霉烯失活法(sCIM)是一种碳青霉烯酶检测方法,与其他表型检测方法相比,其操作时间更少,但在检测一组产 IMP 的 CPE 时,其灵敏度和特异性都不理想。怀疑是由于接种不足导致亚胺培南失活不足。虽然 sCIM 更容易操作,但在广泛应用于临床实验室之前,还需要进一步优化。