Suppr超能文献

基于电子重症监护病房(eICU)数据库分析,使用氧合指数(SaO₂/FiO₂)进行死亡率预测。

Mortality Prediction Using SaO/FiO Ratio Based on eICU Database Analysis.

作者信息

Patel Sharad, Singh Gurkeerat, Zarbiv Samson, Ghiassi Kia, Rachoin Jean-Sebastien

机构信息

Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ, USA.

Piedmont Columbus Regional, Columbus, GA, USA.

出版信息

Crit Care Res Pract. 2021 Nov 8;2021:6672603. doi: 10.1155/2021/6672603. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

PURPOSE

PaO to FiO ratio (P/F) is used to assess the degree of hypoxemia adjusted for oxygen requirements. The Berlin definition of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) includes P/F as a diagnostic criterion. P/F is invasive and cost-prohibitive for resource-limited settings. SaO/FiO (S/F) ratio has the advantages of being easy to calculate, noninvasive, continuous, cost-effective, and reliable, as well as lower infection exposure potential for staff, and avoids iatrogenic anemia. Previous work suggests that the SaO/FiO ratio (S/F) correlates with P/F and can be used as a surrogate in ARDS. Quantitative correlation between S/F and P/F has been verified, but the data for the relative predictive ability for ICU mortality remains in question. We hypothesize that S/F is noninferior to P/F as a predictive feature for ICU mortality. Using a machine-learning approach, we hope to demonstrate the relative mortality predictive capacities of S/F and P/F.

METHODS

We extracted data from the eICU Collaborative Research Database. The features age, gender, SaO, PaO, FIO, admission diagnosis, Apache IV, mechanical ventilation (MV), and ICU mortality were extracted. Mortality was the dependent variable for our prediction models. Exploratory data analysis was performed in . Missing data was imputed with Sklearn Iterative Imputer. Random assignment of all the encounters, 80% to the training ( = 26690) and 20% to testing ( = 6741), was stratified by positive and negative classes to ensure a balanced distribution. We scaled the data using the Sklearn Standard Scaler. Categorical values were encoded using Target Encoding. We used a gradient boosting decision tree algorithm variant called XGBoost as our model. Model hyperparameters were tuned using the Sklearn RandomizedSearchCV with tenfold cross-validation. We used AUC as our metric for model performance. Feature importance was assessed using SHAP, ELI5 (permutation importance), and a built-in XGBoost feature importance method. We constructed partial dependence plots to illustrate the relationship between mortality probability and S/F values.

RESULTS

The XGBoost hyperparameter optimized model had an AUC score of .85 on the test set. The hyperparameters selected to train the final models were as follows: colsample_bytree of 0.8, gamma of 1, max_depth of 3, subsample of 1, min_child_weight of 10, and scale_pos_weight of 3. The SHAP, ELI5, and XGBoost feature importance analysis demonstrates that the S/F ratio ranks as the strongest predictor for mortality amongst the physiologic variables. The partial dependence plots illustrate that mortality rises significantly above S/F values of 200.

CONCLUSION

S/F was a stronger predictor of mortality than P/F based upon feature importance evaluation of our data. Our study is hypothesis-generating and a prospective evaluation is warranted. . S/F ratio is a noninvasive continuous method of measuring hypoxemia as compared to P/F ratio. Our study shows that the S/F ratio is a better predictor of mortality than the more widely used P/F ratio to monitor and manage hypoxemia.

摘要

目的

动脉血氧分压与吸入氧浓度比值(P/F)用于评估根据氧气需求调整后的低氧血症程度。急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的柏林定义将P/F纳入诊断标准。在资源有限的环境中,P/F测量具有侵入性且成本高昂。动脉血氧饱和度与吸入氧浓度比值(S/F)具有易于计算、非侵入性、可连续监测、成本效益高且可靠的优点,同时还能降低工作人员的感染风险,并避免医源性贫血。先前的研究表明,S/F比值与P/F相关,可在ARDS中作为替代指标。S/F与P/F之间的定量相关性已得到验证,但关于其对ICU死亡率的相对预测能力的数据仍存在疑问。我们假设,作为ICU死亡率的预测指标,S/F不劣于P/F。我们希望通过机器学习方法来证明S/F和P/F对死亡率的相对预测能力。

方法

我们从电子重症监护病房协作研究数据库中提取数据。提取的特征包括年龄、性别、动脉血氧饱和度(SaO)、动脉血氧分压(PaO)、吸入氧浓度(FIO)、入院诊断、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统IV(Apache IV)、机械通气(MV)以及ICU死亡率。死亡率是我们预测模型的因变量。在Python中进行探索性数据分析。使用Sklearn迭代插补器对缺失数据进行插补。将所有病例随机分配,80%用于训练(n = 26690),20%用于测试(n = 6741),并按阳性和阴性类别进行分层,以确保分布均衡。我们使用Sklearn标准缩放器对数据进行缩放。使用目标编码对分类值进行编码。我们使用一种名为XGBoost的梯度提升决策树算法变体作为模型。使用Sklearn随机搜索交叉验证(RandomizedSearchCV)并进行十折交叉验证来调整模型超参数。我们使用曲线下面积(AUC)作为模型性能的指标。使用SHAP、ELI5(排列重要性)和XGBoost内置的特征重要性方法评估特征重要性。我们构建了部分依赖图来说明死亡率概率与S/F值之间的关系。

结果

XGBoost超参数优化模型在测试集上的AUC得分为0.85。用于训练最终模型的选定超参数如下:按树采样比例(colsample_bytree)为0.8,伽马值(gamma)为1,最大深度(max_depth)为3,子采样比例(subsample)为1,最小子节点权重(min_child_weight)为10,以及正例权重(scale_pos_weight)为3。SHAP、ELI5和XGBoost特征重要性分析表明,在生理变量中,S/F比值是死亡率最强的预测指标。部分依赖图表明,当S/F值超过200时,死亡率显著上升。

结论

根据我们数据的特征重要性评估,S/F是比P/F更强的死亡率预测指标。我们的研究只是初步探索性的,有必要进行前瞻性评估。与P/F比值相比,S/F比值是一种测量低氧血症的非侵入性连续方法。我们的研究表明,在监测和管理低氧血症方面,S/F比值比更广泛使用的P/F比值是更好的死亡率预测指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c9a/8592728/563f0e0ee400/CCRP2021-6672603.001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验