School of Medicine and Public Health, Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Department of Educational Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Addiction. 2022 May;117(5):1416-1426. doi: 10.1111/add.15747. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
To understand dual users' cigarette and e-cigarette use patterns, including the contexts in which they vape versus smoke and to understand how environmental and internal contexts and smoking patterns differ between dual users and exclusive smokers.
Longitudinal observational trial.
Research center in Wisconsin, USA.
Adult dual users (n = 162) and adults who exclusively smoked (n = 143), with no plans to quit smoking or vaping in the next 30 days.
Participants carried smartphones for 2 weeks at baseline to record each use event for the two products and report on the context of their product use. The percentage of mornings where participants vaped first versus smoked were used to compute e-cigarette dependence.
Hierarchical linear regression models with random slopes and intercepts examined the within- and between-subject effects of context on the likelihood of vaping (versus smoking); significant fixed effects were tested for moderation by e-cigarette dependence. Dual users reported significantly more puffs/cigarette [mean = 13.1, standard deviation (SD) = 10.2] than puffs/vape event (mean = 11.7, SD = 11.5; P = 0.01). E-cigarette dependence moderated the influence of social cues (t-ratio = 2.4, P = 0.02) and smoking restrictions (t-ratio = 3.1, P = 0.003) on the likelihood of vaping versus smoking [odds ratio (OR) = 2.30, P = 0.02]. Context was more related to which product was used in those of low versus higher e-cigarette dependence. Reports of strong cravings to smoke and positive expectancies for cigarettes were associated with a reduced likelihood of vaping, whereas strong cravings to vape and positive vaping expectancies were related to increased likelihood of vaping.
Among dual users of cigarettes and e-cigarettes with no motivation to quit, vaping appears to be related to internal cues and more highly linked with social contexts and smoking restrictions (i.e. under stronger external stimulus control) among those with low to moderate e-cigarette dependence compared with high e-cigarette dependence. These findings illustrate the importance of contextual factors in tobacco product use among dual users with the influence of context being reduced at high levels of e-cigarette dependence.
了解双重使用者的香烟和电子烟使用模式,包括他们吸食电子烟和香烟的情境,以及了解环境和内部情境以及吸烟模式在双重使用者和单纯吸烟者之间的差异。
纵向观察性试验。
美国威斯康星州的研究中心。
成年双重使用者(n=162)和单纯吸烟者(n=143),在未来 30 天内没有戒烟或戒烟的计划。
参与者在基线时携带智能手机两周,记录两种产品的每次使用事件,并报告产品使用的情境。使用早晨首次吸食电子烟与吸烟的比例来计算电子烟依赖程度。
使用带有随机斜率和截距的分层线性回归模型,检查了情境对吸食电子烟(而非吸烟)可能性的个体内和个体间影响;对于电子烟依赖的调节作用,测试了显著的固定效应。双重使用者报告的每支香烟的吸烟量[平均值=13.1,标准差(SD)=10.2]明显高于每支电子烟的吸烟量(平均值=11.7,SD=11.5;P=0.01)。电子烟依赖程度调节了社会线索(t-比=2.4,P=0.02)和吸烟限制(t-比=3.1,P=0.003)对吸食电子烟与吸烟可能性的影响[比值比(OR)=2.30,P=0.02]。对于电子烟依赖程度较低的个体,情境与使用哪种产品的关系更密切。强烈的吸烟欲望和对香烟的积极预期与吸食电子烟的可能性降低有关,而强烈的吸食电子烟欲望和对电子烟的积极预期与吸食电子烟的可能性增加有关。
在没有戒烟动机的香烟和电子烟双重使用者中,吸食电子烟似乎与内部线索有关,与社会情境和吸烟限制的关系更为密切(即在较低的电子烟依赖程度下受到更强的外部刺激控制),而与较高的电子烟依赖程度相比,电子烟依赖程度较低的个体受情境因素的影响较小。这些发现说明了在双重使用者中,情境因素在烟草产品使用中的重要性,并且在电子烟依赖程度较高时,情境因素的影响会降低。