1Center for Diabetes Technology, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
2School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Diabetes Care. 2022 Jan 1;45(1):186-193. doi: 10.2337/dc21-0838.
Achieving optimal glycemic control for many individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) remains challenging, even with the advent of newer management tools, including continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Modern management of T1D generates a wealth of data; however, use of these data to optimize glycemic control remains limited. We evaluated the impact of a CGM-based decision support system (DSS) in patients with T1D using multiple daily injections (MDI).
The studied DSS included real-time dosing advice and retrospective therapy optimization. Adults and adolescents (age >15 years) with T1D using MDI were enrolled at three sites in a 14-week randomized controlled trial of MDI + CGM + DSS versus MDI + CGM. All participants (N = 80) used degludec basal insulin and Dexcom G5 CGM. CGM-based and patient-reported outcomes were analyzed. Within the DSS group, ad hoc analysis further contrasted active versus nonactive DSS users.
No significant differences were detected between experimental and control groups (e.g., time in range [TIR] +3.3% with CGM vs. +4.4% with DSS). Participants in both groups reported lower HbA1c (-0.3%; P = 0.001) with respect to baseline. While TIR may have improved in both groups, it was statistically significant only for DSS; the same was apparent for time spent <60 mg/dL. Active versus nonactive DSS users showed lower risk of and exposure to hypoglycemia with system use.
Our DSS seems to be a feasible option for individuals using MDI, although the glycemic benefits associated with use need to be further investigated. System design, therapy requirements, and target population should be further refined prior to use in clinical care.
即使有了新的管理工具,包括连续血糖监测(CGM),许多 1 型糖尿病(T1D)患者仍难以达到最佳血糖控制。T1D 的现代管理会产生大量数据;然而,使用这些数据来优化血糖控制仍然有限。我们评估了基于 CGM 的决策支持系统(DSS)在使用多次每日注射(MDI)的 T1D 患者中的影响。
所研究的 DSS 包括实时剂量建议和回顾性治疗优化。在一项为期 14 周的 MDI+CGM+DSS 与 MDI+CGM 对比的随机对照试验中,三个地点招募了使用 MDI 的成人和青少年(年龄>15 岁)T1D 患者。所有参与者(N=80)均使用德谷胰岛素基础胰岛素和 Dexcom G5 CGM。分析了基于 CGM 的和患者报告的结果。在 DSS 组中,进行了专门分析,进一步对比了主动和非主动 DSS 用户。
实验组和对照组之间未检测到显著差异(例如,CGM 组的 TIR+3.3%与 DSS 组的 TIR+4.4%)。两组参与者的 HbA1c 均较基线水平有所下降(-0.3%;P=0.001)。尽管两组的 TIR 可能都有所改善,但 DSS 组的改善具有统计学意义,而 DSS 组的<60mg/dL 时间也同样如此。与系统使用相关,主动 DSS 用户发生和暴露于低血糖的风险较低。
我们的 DSS 似乎是使用 MDI 的个体的可行选择,尽管使用 DSS 相关的血糖益处需要进一步研究。在将其用于临床护理之前,应进一步改进系统设计、治疗要求和目标人群。