• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工智能数字化伤口监测对心脏手术患者的手术伤口进行优先或标准评估的优先级排序:一项随机可行性试验(WISDOM)的方案。

Digital wound monitoring with artificial intelligence to prioritise surgical wounds in cardiac surgery patients for priority or standard review: protocol for a randomised feasibility trial (WISDOM).

机构信息

School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

Infection Prevention and Control, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 17;14(9):e086486. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086486.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086486
PMID:39289023
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11409336/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Digital surgical wound monitoring for patients at home is becoming an increasingly common method of wound follow-up. This regular monitoring improves patient outcomes by detecting wound complications early and enabling treatment to start before complications worsen. However, reviewing the digital data creates a new and additional workload for staff. The aim of this study is to assess a surgical wound monitoring platform that uses artificial intelligence to assist clinicians to review patients' wound images by prioritising concerning images for urgent review. This will manage staff time more effectively.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a feasibility study for a new artificial intelligence module with 120 cardiac surgery patients at two centres serving a range of patient ethnicities and urban, rural and coastal locations. Each patient will be randomly allocated using a 1:1 ratio with mixed block sizes to receive the platform with the new detection and prioritising module (for up to 30 days after surgery) plus standard postoperative wound care or standard postoperative wound care only. Assessment is through surveys, interviews, phone calls and platform review at 30 days and through medical notes review and patient phone calls at 60 days. Outcomes will assess safety, acceptability, feasibility and health economic endpoints. The decision to proceed to a definitive trial will be based on prespecified progression criteria.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Permission to conduct the study was granted by the North of Scotland Research Ethics Committee 1 (24/NS0005) and the MHRA (CI/2024/0004/GB). The results of this Wound Imaging Software Digital platfOrM (WISDOM) study will be reported in peer-reviewed open-access journals and shared with participants and stakeholders.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

ISRCTN16900119 and NCT06475703.

摘要

简介

患者居家的数字化手术伤口监测正成为一种越来越常见的伤口随访方法。这种定期监测通过早期发现伤口并发症并在并发症恶化之前开始治疗,从而改善患者的治疗效果。然而,审查数字数据会给工作人员带来新的、额外的工作量。本研究旨在评估一种使用人工智能辅助临床医生审查患者伤口图像的手术伤口监测平台,通过优先审查有问题的图像来管理工作人员的时间,从而更有效地处理伤口。

方法和分析

这是一项针对具有新人工智能模块的可行性研究,纳入了来自两个中心的 120 名心脏手术患者,涵盖了各种患者种族以及城市、农村和沿海地区。每个患者将使用混合大小的 1:1 随机分配,接受带有新检测和优先级模块的平台(最长 30 天术后)加标准术后伤口护理或仅标准术后伤口护理。评估通过 30 天的问卷调查、访谈、电话和平台审查以及 60 天的医疗记录审查和患者电话进行。结果将评估安全性、可接受性、可行性和健康经济学终点。是否进行确定性试验的决定将基于预设的进展标准。

伦理和传播

北苏格兰研究伦理委员会 1(24/NS0005)和 MHRA(CI/2024/0004/GB)已批准进行该研究。Wound Imaging Software Digital platfOrM(WISDOM)研究的结果将在同行评议的开放获取期刊上报告,并与参与者和利益相关者共享。

试验注册号

ISRCTN83434122 和 NCT06475703。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4582/11409336/797efcbaf3f0/bmjopen-14-9-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4582/11409336/797efcbaf3f0/bmjopen-14-9-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4582/11409336/797efcbaf3f0/bmjopen-14-9-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Digital wound monitoring with artificial intelligence to prioritise surgical wounds in cardiac surgery patients for priority or standard review: protocol for a randomised feasibility trial (WISDOM).人工智能数字化伤口监测对心脏手术患者的手术伤口进行优先或标准评估的优先级排序:一项随机可行性试验(WISDOM)的方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 17;14(9):e086486. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086486.
2
Wound imaging software and digital platform to assist review of surgical wounds using patient smartphones: The development and evaluation of artificial intelligence (WISDOM AI study).使用患者智能手机辅助手术伤口评估的伤口成像软件和数字平台:人工智能的开发与评估(WISDOM人工智能研究)
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 9;19(12):e0315384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315384. eCollection 2024.
3
Feasibility study of rehabilitation for cardiac patients aided by an artificial intelligence web-based programme: a randomised controlled trial (RECAP trial)-a study protocol.人工智能网络程序辅助心脏康复患者的可行性研究:一项随机对照试验(RECAP 试验)-研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 30;14(4):e079404. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079404.
4
A Randomized Open label Phase-II Clinical Trial with or without Infusion of Plasma from Subjects after Convalescence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in High-Risk Patients with Confirmed Severe SARS-CoV-2 Disease (RECOVER): A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项针对高风险确诊严重 SARS-CoV-2 疾病患者的随机开放标签 II 期临床试验,比较 SARS-CoV-2 感染后恢复期患者输注血浆与未输注血浆的疗效(RECOVER):一项随机对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 6;21(1):828. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04735-y.
5
Three wound-dressing strategies to reduce surgical site infection after abdominal surgery: the Bluebelle feasibility study and pilot RCT.三种减少腹部手术后手术部位感染的伤口处理策略:Bluebelle 可行性研究和初步 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Aug;23(39):1-166. doi: 10.3310/hta23390.
6
Effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy in the prevention of surgical wound complications in the cesarean section at-risk population: a parallel group randomised multicentre trial-the CYGNUS protocol.负压伤口疗法在高危剖宫产术预防手术切口并发症中的有效性:一项平行组随机多中心试验——CYGNUS 方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):e035727. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035727.
7
Testing the efficacy and safety of BIO101, for the prevention of respiratory deterioration, in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia (COVA study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.评估 BIO101 预防 COVID-19 肺炎患者呼吸恶化的疗效和安全性(COVA 研究):一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 11;22(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04998-5.
8
Assessing the impact of digital patient monitoring on health outcomes and healthcare resource usage in addition to the feasibility of its combination with at-home treatment, in participants receiving systemic anticancer treatment in clinical practice: protocol for an interventional, open-label, multicountry platform study (ORIGAMA).评估数字患者监测对健康结果和医疗资源使用的影响,以及其与家庭治疗相结合的可行性,在临床实践中接受系统抗癌治疗的参与者:一项干预性、开放性标签、多国家平台研究(ORIGAMA)的方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 19;13(4):e063242. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063242.
9
Feasibility study of early outpatient review and early cardiac rehabilitation after cardiac surgery: mixed-methods research design-a study protocol.心脏手术后早期门诊复查及早期心脏康复的可行性研究:混合方法研究设计——一项研究方案
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 29;9(12):e035787. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035787.
10
Radiograph accelerated detection and identification of cancer in the lung (RADICAL): a mixed methods study to assess the clinical effectiveness and acceptability of Qure.ai artificial intelligence software to prioritise chest X-ray (CXR) interpretation.放射图加速检测和识别肺癌(RADICAL):一项混合方法研究,评估 Qure.ai 人工智能软件在优先进行胸部 X 光(CXR)解读方面的临床效果和可接受性。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 20;14(9):e081062. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081062.

引用本文的文献

1
Wound imaging software and digital platform to assist review of surgical wounds using patient smartphones: The development and evaluation of artificial intelligence (WISDOM AI study).使用患者智能手机辅助手术伤口评估的伤口成像软件和数字平台:人工智能的开发与评估(WISDOM人工智能研究)
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 9;19(12):e0315384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315384. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Digital tools for post-discharge surveillance of surgical site infection.用于术后手术部位感染监测的数字工具。
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Jan;80(1):96-109. doi: 10.1111/jan.15830. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
2
Using artificial intelligence to reduce orthopedic surgical site infection surveillance workload: Algorithm design, validation, and implementation in 4 Spanish hospitals.利用人工智能减少矫形外科手术部位感染监测工作量:在 4 家西班牙医院的算法设计、验证和实施。
Am J Infect Control. 2023 Nov;51(11):1225-1229. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2023.04.165. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
3
Image-based digital post-discharge surveillance in England: measuring patient enrolment, engagement, clinician response times, surgical site infection, and carbon footprint.
英格兰基于图像的出院后数字监测:衡量患者登记、参与度、临床医生响应时间、手术部位感染和碳足迹。
J Hosp Infect. 2023 Mar;133:15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.01.001. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
4
Construct and Validate a Predictive Model for Surgical Site Infection after Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Based on Machine Learning Algorithm.基于机器学习算法构建和验证后路腰椎椎间融合术后手术部位感染的预测模型。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Aug 23;2022:2697841. doi: 10.1155/2022/2697841. eCollection 2022.
5
Remote diagnosis of surgical-site infection using a mobile digital intervention: a randomised controlled trial in emergency surgery patients.使用移动数字干预进行手术部位感染的远程诊断:一项针对急诊手术患者的随机对照试验。
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Nov 18;4(1):160. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00526-0.
6
Image-Based Artificial Intelligence in Wound Assessment: A Systematic Review.基于图像的人工智能在伤口评估中的应用:系统评价。
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2022 Dec;11(12):687-709. doi: 10.1089/wound.2021.0091. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
7
The impact of surgical site infection on hospitalisation, treatment costs, and health-related quality of life after vascular surgery.血管手术后手术部位感染对住院时间、治疗费用和健康相关生活质量的影响。
Int Wound J. 2021 Jun;18(3):261-268. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13526. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
8
Proportion of Surgical Site Infections Occurring after Hospital Discharge: A Systematic Review.出院后发生手术部位感染的比例:一项系统评价。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2016 Oct;17(5):510-9. doi: 10.1089/sur.2015.241. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
9
Management practices and major infections after cardiac surgery.心脏手术后的管理实践和主要感染。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jul 29;64(4):372-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.04.052.
10
SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials.SPIRIT 2013 解释和说明:临床试验方案指南。
BMJ. 2013 Jan 8;346:e7586. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7586.