Kang Jae Seung, Hong Su Young, Han Youngmin, Sohn Hee Ju, Lee Mirang, Kang Yoon Hyung, Kim Hyeong Seok, Kim Hongbeom, Kwon Wooil, Jang Jin-Young
Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2021 Nov;101(5):266-273. doi: 10.4174/astr.2021.101.5.266. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
Although serum CEA and CA 19-9 have been widely utilized for the diagnosis of gallbladder cancer (GBC), few studies have examined the diagnostic performance of them. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of these 2 biomarkers and demonstrate their clinical usefulness in diagnosing GBC.
Between January 2000 and March 2020, a total of 751 GBC patients and 2,310 normal controls were included. Serum CEA and CA 19-9 were measured preoperatively. Receiver operating characteristic curves were obtained, and the sensitivity and specificity of each biomarker were evaluated.
In terms of differentiating GBC from the control, the sensitivity and specificity of serum CEA at 5 ng/mL was 12.1% and 99.1%, respectively, and those of serum CA 19-9 at 37 IU/mL were 28.7% and 94.5%, respectively. The optimal cutoff values of CEA and CA 19-9 were set to 2.1 ng/mL and 26 IU/mL in the receiver operating characteristic curves, respectively. The sensitivities of CEA and CA 19-9 at new cutoff values slightly increased but remained low (CEA, 42.9%; CA 19-9, 38.2%). When differentiating early-stage GBC from advanced tumor, the sensitivity and specificity, were 14.2% and 96.1% for CEA (cutoff value, 5 ng/mL) and 33.6% and 90.1% for CA 19-9 (cutoff value, 37 IU/mL), respectively.
Serum CEA and CA 19-9 levels are not suitable for screening GBC patients from controls. New promising biomarkers with higher sensitivity should be explored.
尽管血清癌胚抗原(CEA)和糖类抗原19-9(CA 19-9)已被广泛用于胆囊癌(GBC)的诊断,但很少有研究检验它们的诊断效能。本研究旨在调查这两种生物标志物的诊断效能,并证明其在诊断GBC中的临床实用性。
纳入2000年1月至2020年3月期间的751例GBC患者和2310例正常对照。术前检测血清CEA和CA 19-9。绘制受试者工作特征曲线,并评估每种生物标志物的敏感性和特异性。
在区分GBC与对照组方面,血清CEA浓度为5 ng/mL时的敏感性和特异性分别为12.1%和99.1%,血清CA 19-9浓度为37 IU/mL时的敏感性和特异性分别为28.7%和94.5%。在受试者工作特征曲线中,CEA和CA 19-9的最佳截断值分别设定为2.1 ng/mL和26 IU/mL。在新的截断值下,CEA和CA 19-9的敏感性略有增加,但仍较低(CEA为42.9%;CA 19-9为38.2%)。在区分早期GBC与晚期肿瘤时,CEA(截断值为5 ng/mL)的敏感性和特异性分别为14.2%和96.1%,CA 19-9(截断值为37 IU/mL)的敏感性和特异性分别为33.6%和90.1%。
血清CEA和CA 19-9水平不适用于从对照组中筛查GBC患者。应探索具有更高敏感性的新的有前景的生物标志物。