Department of Dermatology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Dermatology, Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Ann Med. 2021 Dec;53(1):2205-2214. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2021.2004319.
Topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs) are an important anti-inflammatory drug for treating atopic dermatitis (AD). However, those treatment responses are variable. In this study, we stratified AD patients by patterns of response to remission maintenance therapy (proactive therapy) with topical tacrolimus, a typical TCI. Thereafter, we explored patient features that predict the success or failure of proactive therapy using TCI (TCI proactive therapy).
A single-arm open-label clinical study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of TCI proactive therapy was conducted in 31 patients with AD. Patients were treated with TCS to induce remission (remission-induction period) followed by daily TCI ointment (0.1% tacrolimus) application for 4 weeks (maintenance therapy period), and twice-weekly application for 12 weeks (proactive therapy period). Based on its results, treatment outcomes were correlated with the patients' clinical and laboratory findings.
Of the 31 patients enrolled in the study, 21 successfully completed maintenance therapy (TCI responders). Among them, 13 completed (proactive-completed group) and 8 failed proactive therapy (proactive-dropout group). At the beginning of maintenance therapy, the serum IgE level was significantly higher in the TCI responders than in those who failed maintenance therapy ( = 0.049). At the beginning of proactive therapy, the mean-SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) score was significantly different between the proactive-completed (11.7 ± 4.6) and proactive-dropout (16.6 ± 4.2) groups ( = 0.025). In proactive-dropout group patients, worsened disease activity correlated well with the elevation of serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and Thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC) levels and peripheral eosinophil count.
AD patients were stratified into three different response patterns to TCI proactive therapy. Patients with less involvement of IgE in the pathogenesis and inadequate remission induction by TCS may not be expected to respond well to TCI proactive therapy.Key messagesAD patients can be stratified into three types according to their pattern of responsiveness to TCI proactive therapy.The efficacy of TCI proactive therapy is lower in AD patients with lower serum IgE levels.TCI proactive therapy should be done after the achievement of adequate remission induction by TCS.
局部钙调磷酸酶抑制剂(TCIs)是治疗特应性皮炎(AD)的一种重要抗炎药物。然而,这些治疗反应存在差异。在这项研究中,我们根据他克莫司(一种典型的 TCI)维持缓解治疗(主动治疗)的反应模式对 AD 患者进行分层。此后,我们使用 TCI(TCI 主动治疗)探索了预测主动治疗成功或失败的患者特征。
一项旨在评估 TCI 主动治疗疗效的单臂开放标签临床研究招募了 31 名 AD 患者。患者接受皮质类固醇诱导缓解(缓解诱导期),随后每天使用 TCI 软膏(0.1%他克莫司)治疗 4 周(维持治疗期),并在 12 周内每两周治疗一次(主动治疗期)。根据其结果,将治疗结果与患者的临床和实验室发现相关联。
31 名入组患者中,21 名成功完成维持治疗(TCI 应答者)。其中,13 名完成(主动完成组),8 名主动治疗失败(主动脱落组)。在维持治疗开始时,TCI 应答者的血清 IgE 水平明显高于那些未完成维持治疗的患者(=0.049)。在主动治疗开始时,主动完成组(11.7±4.6)和主动脱落组(16.6±4.2)的平均 SCORing 特应性皮炎(SCORAD)评分差异有统计学意义(=0.025)。在主动脱落组患者中,疾病活动度的恶化与血清乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)、胸腺激活调节趋化因子(TARC)水平和外周嗜酸性粒细胞计数的升高密切相关。
AD 患者可以根据他们对 TCI 主动治疗的反应模式分为三种不同的类型。那些发病机制中 IgE 参与较少、皮质类固醇诱导缓解不足的患者可能对 TCI 主动治疗反应不佳。
AD 患者可以根据他们对 TCI 主动治疗的反应模式分为三种类型。AD 患者血清 IgE 水平较低时,TCI 主动治疗效果较差。TCI 主动治疗应在 TCS 达到充分缓解诱导后进行。