Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Oftalmologia, Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Ciências da Saúde, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Nov-Dec;88 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S50-S58. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.10.002. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
There are few studies on long-latency auditory evoked potential (P300) in people with hearing loss who use a cochlear implant. Central auditory system evaluation with behavioral and electrophysiological tests is believed to help understand the neuroplasticity mechanisms involved in auditory functioning after cochlear implant surgery. This study investigated the electrophysiological processing of cortical level acoustic signals in a group of 21 adult individuals with postlingual bilateral severe-to-profound hearing loss who were submitted to cochlear implant surgery.
Data were collected in three phases: pre-cochlear implant surgery, at cochlear implant activation, and 6 months after surgery. P300 measures were also registered during all phases. Tone-burst and speech stimuli were used to elicit P300 and were presented in free field.
Mean P3 component latency with tone-burst and speech stimuli were 352.9 and 321.9 ms in the pre-cochlear implant phase, 364.9 and 368.7 ms in the activation phase, 336.2 and 343.6 ms 6 months after the surgery. The P3 component mean latency values using tone-burst at activation were significantly different from those 6 months after cochlear implant. They were also significantly different using speech, between pre-cochlear implant and activation phases. Lower P3 component latency occurred 6 months after cochlear implant activation with tone-burst and pre-cochlear implant with speech stimulus. There was a weak correlation between mean P3 component latency with speech stimulus and time of hearing loss. There was no difference in amplitude between phases or in the comparison with the other variables.
There were changes in P3 component latency during the period assessed, for both speech and pure-tone stimuli, with increased latency in the activation phase and similar lower results in the two other phases, Pre-CI and 6 months after CI use. Mean amplitude measures did not vary in the three phases.
在使用人工耳蜗的听力损失患者中,关于长潜伏期听觉诱发电位(P300)的研究较少。通过行为和电生理测试对中枢听觉系统进行评估,有助于了解人工耳蜗手术后听觉功能涉及的神经可塑性机制。本研究调查了 21 名成年后天性双侧重度至极重度感音神经性聋患者在接受人工耳蜗植入手术后皮质水平声信号的电生理处理。
数据收集分为三个阶段:人工耳蜗植入术前、人工耳蜗植入激活时和术后 6 个月。在所有阶段都记录了 P300 测量值。使用短音和言语刺激来引出 P300,并用自由场呈现。
在人工耳蜗植入术前阶段,短音和言语刺激的 P3 成分潜伏期平均值分别为 352.9ms 和 321.9ms;在激活阶段分别为 364.9ms 和 368.7ms;在术后 6 个月时分别为 336.2ms 和 343.6ms。在激活阶段使用短音刺激时,P3 成分潜伏期的平均值明显不同于植入后 6 个月时的值,而在植入前阶段使用言语刺激时,潜伏期的平均值也明显不同于激活阶段的值。在植入后 6 个月时,使用短音刺激时 P3 成分潜伏期比植入后激活时短,而使用言语刺激时,潜伏期比植入前短。P3 成分潜伏期与言语刺激的平均潜伏期之间存在弱相关性,与听力损失时间有关。在三个阶段之间,振幅没有差异,与其他变量也没有差异。
在评估期间,无论是言语还是纯音刺激,P3 成分潜伏期都发生了变化,在激活阶段潜伏期延长,而在另外两个阶段(CI 前和使用 CI 后 6 个月)潜伏期相似。在三个阶段,平均振幅测量值都没有变化。