• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术加放化疗对Ⅱ-Ⅲ期老年食管癌患者生存的影响:基于 SEER 的人口统计学分析。

The effect of surgery plus chemoradiotherapy on survival of elderly patients with stage Ⅱ-Ⅲ esophageal cancer: a SEER-based demographic analysis.

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, China.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2021 Dec;10(23):8483-8496. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4352. Epub 2021 Nov 19.

DOI:10.1002/cam4.4352
PMID:34800005
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8633220/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment for elderly patients with esophageal cancer (EC) remains controversial. In the present study, we aimed to investigate whether elderly patients with stage II-III EC could benefit from trimodal therapy.

METHODS

The selected elderly patients with stage II-III EC between 2004 and 2015 were included in a retrospective cohort study from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether or not they underwent surgery. The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was used to balance the confounding factors between the two groups. The Cox regression analysis, the log-rank test, and the Kaplan-Meier curves were conducted to identify the survival benefits of different treatment regimes.

RESULTS

A total of 1596 patients were included in this cohort study, in which 278 patients underwent surgery. In the combination of chemoradiotherapy and surgery group, there were more male patients, more patients aged between 75 and 79 years, and more married patients in the surgery group. Moreover, there were more patients with adenomatous carcinoma, more patients with a tumor size of less than 5 cm, and more patients with a T3 stage in the combination group. In the survival analysis, patients in the combination group had a longer overall survival (OS) and EC-specific survival (ECSS). After IPTW analysis, the survival analysis generated similar results. The competitive risk model found that our results were stable. There was still a significant difference in OS and ECSS between the combination group and chemoradiotherapy alone group for esophageal adenocarcinoma (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients with stage II-III EC, especially those with adenocarcinoma, could benefit from the combination of surgery and chemoradiotherapy.

摘要

背景

老年食管癌(EC)患者的最佳治疗方法仍存在争议。本研究旨在探讨Ⅱ-Ⅲ期老年 EC 患者是否能从三联疗法中获益。

方法

从 Surveillance,Epidemiology,and End Results 数据库中选取 2004 年至 2015 年间的Ⅱ-Ⅲ 期老年 EC 患者进行回顾性队列研究。根据是否接受手术将患者分为两组。采用逆概率治疗加权(IPTW)分析平衡两组间的混杂因素。采用 Cox 回归分析、对数秩检验和 Kaplan-Meier 曲线确定不同治疗方案的生存获益。

结果

本队列研究共纳入 1596 例患者,其中 278 例行手术。在放化疗联合手术组中,手术组的男性患者更多,75-79 岁的患者更多,已婚患者更多。此外,联合组中腺瘤性癌患者更多,肿瘤大小<5cm 的患者更多,T3 期患者更多。生存分析显示,联合组患者的总生存(OS)和 EC 特异性生存(ECSS)更长。经 IPTW 分析后,生存分析结果相似。竞争风险模型发现我们的结果稳定。对于食管腺癌,联合组与单纯放化疗组在 OS 和 ECSS 方面仍存在显著差异(p<0.001)。

结论

Ⅱ-Ⅲ 期老年 EC 患者,尤其是腺癌患者,可从手术联合放化疗中获益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c035/8633220/cbd6db1e68f1/CAM4-10-8483-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c035/8633220/2d419438d882/CAM4-10-8483-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c035/8633220/6c3a61c08a8b/CAM4-10-8483-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c035/8633220/5719656a4309/CAM4-10-8483-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c035/8633220/cbd6db1e68f1/CAM4-10-8483-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c035/8633220/2d419438d882/CAM4-10-8483-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c035/8633220/6c3a61c08a8b/CAM4-10-8483-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c035/8633220/5719656a4309/CAM4-10-8483-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c035/8633220/cbd6db1e68f1/CAM4-10-8483-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The effect of surgery plus chemoradiotherapy on survival of elderly patients with stage Ⅱ-Ⅲ esophageal cancer: a SEER-based demographic analysis.手术加放化疗对Ⅱ-Ⅲ期老年食管癌患者生存的影响:基于 SEER 的人口统计学分析。
Cancer Med. 2021 Dec;10(23):8483-8496. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4352. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
2
Chemoradiotherapy before and after surgery for locally advanced esophageal cancer: a SEER-Medicare analysis.手术前后放化疗治疗局部晚期食管癌:SEER-Medicare 分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Nov;20(12):3999-4007. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3072-9. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
3
Prognostic evaluation of esophageal cancer patients with stages I-III.Ⅰ-Ⅲ期食管癌患者的预后评估。
Aging (Albany NY). 2020 Jul 23;12(14):14736-14753. doi: 10.18632/aging.103532.
4
Treatment Modalities for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in the United States: Trends and Survival Outcomes.美国食管腺癌的治疗方式:趋势与生存结果
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Aug;29(8):989-994. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0350. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
5
Stage III esophageal adenocarcinoma: definitive chemoradiation vs. chemoradiation plus surgery.III期食管腺癌:根治性放化疗与放化疗联合手术对比
Updates Surg. 2018 Dec;70(4):423-426. doi: 10.1007/s13304-018-0541-5. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
6
Single-institution retrospective comparison of preoperative versus definitive chemoradiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.单机构对食管癌腺癌术前与根治性放化疗的回顾性比较
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Nov;21(12):3744-50. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3795-2. Epub 2014 May 23.
7
Conditional survival in patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer after receiving various treatment modalities.不同治疗方式后食管或胃食管交界部癌患者的条件生存。
Cancer Med. 2021 Jan;10(2):659-674. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3651. Epub 2020 Dec 12.
8
Is postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy necessary for patients with esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy? An analysis based on the SEER database.新辅助放化疗后食管癌患者是否需要术后辅助放疗?基于 SEER 数据库的分析。
Saudi Med J. 2024 Aug;45(9):900-910. doi: 10.15537/smj.2024.45.9.20240045.
9
Treatment patterns and survival in T4b esophageal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.T4b 期食管癌的治疗模式和生存情况:一项回顾性队列研究。
Aging (Albany NY). 2024 Apr 18;16(8):7131-7140. doi: 10.18632/aging.205747.
10
Prognostic analysis and treatment utilization of different treatment strategies in elderly esophageal cancer patients with distant metastases: a SEER database analysis.老年食管癌远处转移患者不同治疗策略的预后分析及治疗利用情况:一项监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库分析
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Nov;149(17):15413-15423. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05260-6. Epub 2023 Aug 29.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparison of the clinical outcomes of esophagectomy and chemoradiotherapy for patients aged 75 years or older with surgically resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.75岁及以上可手术切除的食管鳞状细胞癌患者行食管切除术与放化疗的临床结局比较。
Esophagus. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1007/s10388-025-01139-2.
2
Treatment strategies for elderly patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.老年局部晚期食管癌患者的治疗策略:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Sep 4;24(1):1101. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12853-y.
3
Outcomes from a single institution cohort of 248 patients with stage I-III esophageal cancer treated with radiotherapy: Comparison of younger and older populations.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment strategies and outcomes for elderly patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.老年局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌患者的治疗策略与结局
Surg Today. 2022 Mar;52(3):377-384. doi: 10.1007/s00595-021-02348-9. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
2
Outcomes of curative esophageal cancer surgery in elderly: A meta-analysis.老年食管癌根治性手术的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021 Feb 15;13(2):131-146. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i2.131.
3
Outcomes and Tolerability of Definitive and Preoperative Chemoradiation in Elderly Patients With Esophageal Cancer: A Retrospective Institutional Review.
来自单一机构的248例I - III期食管癌患者接受放射治疗的结果:年轻人群与老年人群的比较。
Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2024 Jun 29;31:100260. doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100260. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Multicenter analysis on the value of standard (chemo)radiotherapy in elderly patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction.多中心分析标准(化疗)放疗在老年局部晚期食管腺癌或食管胃交界腺癌患者中的价值。
Radiat Oncol. 2024 Mar 4;19(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13014-024-02414-9.
5
Construction and validation of a prognostic nomogram for predicting cancer-specific survival in patients with intermediate and advanced colon cancer after receiving surgery and chemotherapy.用于预测中晚期结肠癌患者接受手术和化疗后癌症特异性生存的预后列线图的构建与验证
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Nov;149(14):12821-12834. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05154-7. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
老年食管癌患者确定性放疗与术前放化疗的疗效及耐受性:一项回顾性机构研究
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2020 May 21;5(6):1188-1196. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.05.001. eCollection 2020 Nov-Dec.
4
[Tolerability of Definitive Chemoradiotherapy in Elderly Patients with Esophageal Cancer].老年食管癌患者根治性放化疗的耐受性
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2020 Nov;47(11):1577-1581.
5
Clinical outcomes of oesophagectomy in elderly versus relatively younger patients: a meta-analysis.老年患者与相对年轻患者食管癌切除术的临床结局:一项荟萃分析。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019 Dec 1;29(6):897-905. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivz208.
6
[Analysis of incidence and mortality of esophageal cancer in China, 2015].[2015年中国食管癌发病率与死亡率分析]
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Nov 6;53(11):1094-1097. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2019.11.004.
7
Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers, Version 2.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.食管和胃食管交界处癌,2019 年第 2 版,NCCN 肿瘤学临床实践指南。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Jul 1;17(7):855-883. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0033.
8
A model based on endoscopic morphology of submucosal esophageal squamous cell carcinoma for determining risk of metastasis on lymph nodes.基于食管黏膜下鳞状细胞癌内镜形态学的模型,用于确定淋巴结转移风险。
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Dec;10(12):6846-6853. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.11.77.
9
Definitive Chemoradiotherapy Versus Trimodality Therapy for Resectable Oesophageal Carcinoma: Meta-analyses and Systematic Review of Literature.可切除食管癌的确定性放化疗与三联疗法:文献的Meta分析和系统评价
World J Surg. 2019 May;43(5):1271-1285. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-04901-z.
10
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.全球癌症统计数据 2018:GLOBOCAN 对全球 185 个国家/地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率的估计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.