Department of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.
Department of Statistics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.
Ecol Appl. 2022 Mar;32(2):e2500. doi: 10.1002/eap.2500. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
Near-term iterative forecasting is a powerful tool for ecological decision support and has the potential to transform our understanding of ecological predictability. However, to this point, there has been no cross-ecosystem analysis of near-term ecological forecasts, making it difficult to synthesize diverse research efforts and prioritize future developments for this emerging field. In this study, we analyzed 178 near-term (≤10-yr forecast horizon) ecological forecasting papers to understand the development and current state of near-term ecological forecasting literature and to compare forecast accuracy across scales and variables. Our results indicated that near-term ecological forecasting is widespread and growing: forecasts have been produced for sites on all seven continents and the rate of forecast publication is increasing over time. As forecast production has accelerated, some best practices have been proposed and application of these best practices is increasing. In particular, data publication, forecast archiving, and workflow automation have all increased significantly over time. However, adoption of proposed best practices remains low overall: for example, despite the fact that uncertainty is often cited as an essential component of an ecological forecast, only 45% of papers included uncertainty in their forecast outputs. As the use of these proposed best practices increases, near-term ecological forecasting has the potential to make significant contributions to our understanding of forecastability across scales and variables. In this study, we found that forecastability (defined here as realized forecast accuracy) decreased in predictable patterns over 1-7 d forecast horizons. Variables that were closely related (i.e., chlorophyll and phytoplankton) displayed very similar trends in forecastability, while more distantly related variables (i.e., pollen and evapotranspiration) exhibited significantly different patterns. Increasing use of proposed best practices in ecological forecasting will allow us to examine the forecastability of additional variables and timescales in the future, providing a robust analysis of the fundamental predictability of ecological variables.
短期迭代预测是生态决策支持的有力工具,有可能改变我们对生态可预测性的理解。然而,到目前为止,还没有对短期生态预测进行跨生态系统的分析,因此难以综合多样化的研究工作,并为这一新兴领域确定未来的发展重点。在本研究中,我们分析了 178 篇短期(≤10 年预测期限)生态预测论文,以了解短期生态预测文献的发展和现状,并比较不同尺度和变量的预测准确性。我们的结果表明,短期生态预测已经广泛应用并不断发展:已经对七大洲的各个地点进行了预测,并且预测出版物的数量随着时间的推移而增加。随着预测生产的加速,一些最佳实践已经被提出,并且这些最佳实践的应用也在增加。特别是,数据发布、预测存档和工作流程自动化都随着时间的推移显著增加。然而,总体而言,最佳实践的采用率仍然很低:例如,尽管不确定性通常被认为是生态预测的一个重要组成部分,但只有 45%的论文在其预测结果中包含了不确定性。随着这些最佳实践的应用增加,短期生态预测有可能对我们在不同尺度和变量下的可预测性理解做出重大贡献。在本研究中,我们发现,可预测性(这里定义为实际预测准确性)在 1-7 天的预测期限内呈可预测的模式下降。密切相关的变量(即叶绿素和浮游植物)显示出非常相似的可预测性趋势,而更远相关的变量(即花粉和蒸散量)则表现出明显不同的模式。在生态预测中越来越多地采用建议的最佳实践将使我们能够在未来检验更多变量和时间尺度的可预测性,从而对生态变量的基本可预测性进行稳健分析。