Limberger Romana, Daugaard Uriah, Choffat Yves, Gupta Anubhav, Jelić Martina, Jyrkinen Sabina, Krug Rainer M, Nohl Seraina, Pennekamp Frank, van Moorsel Sofia J, Zheng Xue, Zuppinger-Dingley Debra, Petchey Owen L
Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Glob Chang Biol. 2025 Jul;31(7):e70364. doi: 10.1111/gcb.70364.
Accurate forecasts of ecological dynamics are critical for ecosystem management and conservation, yet the drivers of forecastability are poorly understood. Environmental change and diversity are considered major challenges to ecological forecasting. This assumption, however, has never been tested experimentally because forecasts have high data requirements. In a long-term microcosm experiment, we manipulated the species richness of 30 experimental protist communities and exposed them to constant or gradually decreasing light levels. We collected finely resolved time series (123 sampling dates over 41 weeks) of species abundances, community biomass, and oxygen concentrations. We then employed data-driven forecasting methods to forecast these variables. We found that species richness and light had a weak interactive effect on forecasts of species abundances: richness tended to reduce forecast accuracy in constant light but tended to increase forecast accuracy in declining light. These effects could partially be explained by differences among time series in variability and autocorrelation. Forecasts of aggregate properties (community biomass, oxygen), however, were unaffected by richness and light and were not more accurate than those of species abundances. Our forecasts were based on time series that were detrended and standardized. Since real-world forecasting applications require predictions at the original scale of the forecasted variable, it is important to note that the results were qualitatively identical when back-transforming the forecasts to the original scale. Taken together, we found no strong evidence that higher diversity results in lower forecastability. Rather, our results imply that promoting diversity could make populations more predictable when environmental conditions change. From a conservation and management perspective, our findings suggest preliminary support that diversity conservation might have beneficial effects on decision-taking by increasing the forecastability of species abundances in changing environments.
准确预测生态动态对于生态系统管理和保护至关重要,然而,可预测性的驱动因素却鲜为人知。环境变化和多样性被视为生态预测的主要挑战。然而,这一假设从未经过实验验证,因为预测对数据要求很高。在一项长期微观实验中,我们操控了30个实验性原生生物群落的物种丰富度,并将它们置于恒定或逐渐降低的光照水平下。我们收集了物种丰度、群落生物量和氧气浓度的精细解析时间序列(41周内123个采样日期)。然后,我们采用数据驱动的预测方法来预测这些变量。我们发现物种丰富度和光照对物种丰度预测的交互作用较弱:在恒定光照下,丰富度往往会降低预测准确性,但在光照下降时,丰富度往往会提高预测准确性。这些影响部分可以通过时间序列在变异性和自相关性方面的差异来解释。然而,总体属性(群落生物量、氧气)的预测不受丰富度和光照的影响,且并不比物种丰度的预测更准确。我们的预测基于去趋势化和标准化的时间序列。由于实际的预测应用需要在预测变量的原始尺度上进行预测,需要注意的是,将预测结果反变换回原始尺度时,结果在定性上是相同的。综合来看,我们没有发现有力证据表明更高的多样性会导致更低的可预测性。相反,我们的结果表明,当环境条件变化时,促进多样性可能会使种群更具可预测性。从保护和管理的角度来看,我们的研究结果初步支持了这样的观点,即多样性保护可能通过提高变化环境中物种丰度的可预测性,对决策产生有益影响。