• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2005年至2015年美国限制性堕胎政策的变化与不良生育结局

Variation in Restrictive Abortion Policies and Adverse Birth Outcomes in the United States from 2005 to 2015.

作者信息

Redd Sara K, Hall Kelli Stidham, Aswani Monica S, Sen Bisakha, Wingate Martha, Rice Whitney S

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; Center for Reproductive Health Research in the Southeast (RISE), Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.

Center for Reproductive Health Research in the Southeast (RISE), Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York; Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

Womens Health Issues. 2022 Mar-Apr;32(2):103-113. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2021.10.006. Epub 2021 Nov 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.whi.2021.10.006
PMID:34801349
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since 2011, U.S. states have enacted more than 400 policies restricting abortion access. As structural determinants, abortion policies have the potential to influence maternal and child health access, outcomes, and equity through multiple mechanisms. Limited research has examined their implications for birth outcomes.

METHODS

We created a state-level abortion restrictiveness index composed of 18 restrictive abortion policies and evaluated the association between this index and individual-level probabilities of preterm birth (PTB) and low birthweight (LBW) within the United States and by Census Region, using data from the 2005-2015 National Center for Health Statistics Period Linked Live Birth-Infant Death Files. We used logistic multivariable regression modeling, adjusting for individual- and state-level factors and state and year fixed effects.

RESULTS

Among 2,500,000 live births, 269,253 (12.0%) were PTBs and 182,960 (8.1%) were LBW. On average from 2005 to 2015, states had approximately seven restrictive abortion policies enacted, with more policies enacted in the Midwest and South. Nationally, relationships between state restrictiveness indices and adverse birth outcomes were insignificant. Regional analyses revealed that a 1 standard deviation increase in a state's restrictiveness index was associated with a 2% increase in PTB in the Midwest (marginal effect [ME], 0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04-0.45; p < .01), a 15% increase in LBW in the Northeast (ME, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.12-2.35; p < .05), and a 2% increase in LBW in the West (ME, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.01-0.25; p < .05).

CONCLUSION

Variation in restrictive abortion policy environments may have downstream implications for birth outcomes, and increases in abortion restrictions were associated with adverse birth outcomes in three out of four Census Regions.

摘要

背景

自2011年以来,美国各州已颁布400多项限制堕胎的政策。作为结构性决定因素,堕胎政策有可能通过多种机制影响母婴健康服务的可及性、结果和公平性。针对这些政策对出生结局影响的研究有限。

方法

我们创建了一个由18项限制堕胎政策组成的州级堕胎限制指数,并利用2005 - 2015年国家卫生统计中心时期关联出生-婴儿死亡档案的数据,评估该指数与美国全国以及按人口普查区域划分的早产(PTB)和低出生体重(LBW)个体水平概率之间的关联。我们使用逻辑多变量回归模型,对个体和州层面的因素以及州和年份固定效应进行了调整。

结果

在250万例活产中,269,253例(12.0%)为早产,182,960例(8.1%)为低出生体重。2005年至2015年期间,各州平均颁布了约7项限制堕胎政策,中西部和南部颁布的政策更多。在全国范围内,州限制指数与不良出生结局之间的关系不显著。区域分析显示,州限制指数每增加1个标准差,中西部的早产发生率增加2%(边际效应[ME],0.25;95%置信区间[CI],0.04 - 0.45;p <.01),东北部的低出生体重发生率增加15%(ME,1.24;95% CI,0.12 - 2.35;p <.05),西部的低出生体重发生率增加2%(ME,0.12;95% CI,0.01 - 0.25;p <.05)。

结论

限制堕胎政策环境的差异可能对出生结局产生下游影响,并且在四个普查区域中的三个区域,堕胎限制的增加与不良出生结局相关。

相似文献

1
Variation in Restrictive Abortion Policies and Adverse Birth Outcomes in the United States from 2005 to 2015.2005年至2015年美国限制性堕胎政策的变化与不良生育结局
Womens Health Issues. 2022 Mar-Apr;32(2):103-113. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2021.10.006. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
2
Racial/ethnic and educational inequities in restrictive abortion policy variation and adverse birth outcomes in the United States.美国限制堕胎政策差异和不良生育结果中的种族/民族和教育不平等。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 22;21(1):1139. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07165-x.
3
A National Study of the Associations between Hormonal Modulators in Hydraulic Fracturing Fluid Chemicals and Birth Outcomes in the United States of America: A County-Level Analysis.一项关于美国压裂液中荷尔蒙调节剂与生育结局之间关联的全国性研究:县级分析。
Environ Health Perspect. 2024 Oct;132(10):107001. doi: 10.1289/EHP12628. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
4
Previous abortion and the risk of low birth weight and preterm births.既往流产与低出生体重及早产风险
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008 Jan;62(1):16-22. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.050369.
5
Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance — United States, 2012.辅助生殖技术监测—美国,2012 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015 Aug 14;64(6):1-29.
6
The Status of Women's Reproductive Rights and Adverse Birth Outcomes.妇女的生殖权利状况与不良分娩结局
Womens Health Issues. 2017 Mar-Apr;27(2):121-128. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2016.12.013. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
7
Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2009.辅助生殖技术监测报告——美国,2009 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2012 Nov 2;61(7):1-23.
8
Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2011.辅助生殖技术监测——美国,2011 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014 Nov 21;63(10):1-28.
9
Ambient Air Pollution and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Wuhan, China.中国武汉的环境空气污染与不良妊娠结局
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2016 Sep(189):1-65.
10
Association Between Rates of Down Syndrome Diagnosis in States With vs Without 20-Week Abortion Bans From 2011 to 2018.2011 年至 2018 年期间,有与没有 20 周堕胎禁令的州之间唐氏综合征诊断率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e233684. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.3684.

引用本文的文献

1
Navigating women with congenital heart disease during pregnancy: Management strategies and future directions.孕期先天性心脏病女性的管理:策略与未来方向
World J Cardiol. 2025 Jun 26;17(6):106295. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v17.i6.106295.
2
Latina Immigrants' Experiences Accessing Contraceptive Services Beyond the Postpartum Period and the Role of Community and Pediatric Settings.拉丁裔移民产后获取避孕服务的经历以及社区和儿科机构的作用。
Qual Health Res. 2025 May 23:10497323251336577. doi: 10.1177/10497323251336577.
3
The impact of social determinants of health on infant and maternal health using a reproductive justice lens.
从生殖正义视角看健康的社会决定因素对母婴健康的影响。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 May 16;25(1):577. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07693-y.
4
State abortion restrictiveness and prevalence of intimate partner violence and domestic violence among recently birthing black and white individuals.近期分娩的黑人和白人中,州堕胎限制情况以及亲密伴侣暴力和家庭暴力的普遍程度。
Front Reprod Health. 2025 Apr 14;7:1535865. doi: 10.3389/frph.2025.1535865. eCollection 2025.
5
Accuracy and Misleadingness of Anatomical and Embryological Statements in State-Level Abortion Ban Legislation in the United States.美国州级堕胎禁令立法中解剖学和胚胎学陈述的准确性与误导性
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2025 Mar;57(1):17-24. doi: 10.1111/psrh.70001. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
6
Voting Restrictions and Increased Odds of Adverse Birth Outcomes in the US.美国的投票限制与不良出生结局几率的增加
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Dec 6. doi: 10.1007/s40615-024-02253-0.
7
Restrictive abortion legislation and adverse mental health during pregnancy and postpartum.限制堕胎立法与怀孕和产后期间的不良心理健康。
Ann Epidemiol. 2024 Apr;92:47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2024.02.009. Epub 2024 Mar 1.
8
Estimation of Multiyear Consequences for Abortion Access in Georgia Under a Law Limiting Abortion to Early Pregnancy.在限制堕胎仅限于早孕的法律下,对格鲁吉亚堕胎机会的多年后果进行估计。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e231598. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1598.
9
Medication Abortion "Reversal" Laws: How Unsound Science Paved the Way for Dangerous Abortion Policy.药物流产“逆转”法:站不住脚的科学如何为危险的堕胎政策铺平道路。
Am J Public Health. 2023 Feb;113(2):202-212. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.307140.
10
"Post-" Abortion Policy Context Heightens the Imperative for Multilevel, Comprehensive, Integrated Health Education.“后-堕胎政策”背景下,强化多层次、综合、全面的健康教育势在必行。
Health Educ Behav. 2022 Dec;49(6):913-918. doi: 10.1177/10901981221125399. Epub 2022 Sep 29.