Department of Chemical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America.
Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.
J Control Release. 2022 Jan;341:206-214. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.11.022. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
Therapeutic mRNA has the potential to revolutionize the treatment of myriad diseases and, in 2020, facilitated the most rapid vaccine development in history. Among the substantial advances in mRNA technology made in recent years, the incorporation of base modifications into therapeutic mRNA sequences can reduce immunogenicity and increase translation. However, experiments from our lab and others have shown that the incorporation of base modifications does not always yield superior protein expression. We hypothesized that the variable benefit of base modifications may relate to lipid nanoparticle chemistry, formulation, and accumulation within specific organs. To test this theory, we compared IV-injected lipid nanoparticles formulated with reporter mRNA incorporating five base modifications (ψ, m1ψ, m5U, m5C/ψ, and m5C/s2U) and four ionizable lipids (C12-200, cKK-E12, ZA3-Ep10, and 200O) with tropism for different organs. In general, the m1ψ base modification best enhanced translation, producing up to 15-fold improvements in total protein expression compared to unmodified mRNA. Expression improved most dramatically in the spleen (up to 50-fold) and was attributed to enhanced protein expression in monocytic lineage splenocytes. The extent to which these effects were observed varied with delivery vehicle and correlated with differences in innate immunogenicity. Through comparison of firefly luciferase and erythropoietin mRNA constructs, we also found that mRNA modification-induced enhancements in protein expression are limited outside of the spleen, irrespective of delivery vehicle. These results highlight the complexity of mRNA-loaded lipid nanoparticle drug design and show that the effectiveness of mRNA base modifications depend on the delivery vehicle, the target cells, and the site of endogenous protein expression.
治疗性 mRNA 有可能彻底改变多种疾病的治疗方式,并且在 2020 年促成了史上最快的疫苗研发。在近年来 mRNA 技术的诸多进展中,将碱基修饰整合到治疗性 mRNA 序列中可以降低免疫原性并提高翻译效率。然而,我们实验室和其他实验室的实验表明,碱基修饰的加入并不总是能带来更高的蛋白表达水平。我们假设碱基修饰的可变益处可能与脂质纳米颗粒的化学性质、配方以及在特定器官中的积累有关。为了验证这一理论,我们比较了静脉注射用的脂质纳米颗粒,这些纳米颗粒由含有五种碱基修饰(ψ、m1ψ、m5U、m5C/ψ 和 m5C/s2U)和四种可离子化脂质(C12-200、cKK-E12、ZA3-Ep10 和 200O)的报告 mRNA 制成,这些脂质对不同器官具有靶向性。一般来说,m1ψ 碱基修饰能最好地增强翻译,与未修饰的 mRNA 相比,总蛋白表达提高了多达 15 倍。在脾脏中表达改善最为显著(高达 50 倍),这归因于单核细胞谱系脾细胞中的蛋白表达增强。这些效果的观察程度因输送载体而异,并与固有免疫原性的差异相关。通过比较萤火虫荧光素酶和促红细胞生成素 mRNA 构建体,我们还发现,无论输送载体如何,mRNA 修饰诱导的蛋白表达增强在脾脏之外是有限的。这些结果突出了负载 mRNA 的脂质纳米颗粒药物设计的复杂性,并表明 mRNA 碱基修饰的有效性取决于输送载体、靶细胞和内源性蛋白表达部位。