• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人群中 COVID-19 检测的统计模型:抽样偏差和检测误差的影响。

A statistical model of COVID-19 testing in populations: effects of sampling bias andtesting errors.

机构信息

Department of Computational Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, 90095-1766 Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Computational Social Science, Frankfurt School of Finance and Management, 60322 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

出版信息

Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2022 Jan 10;380(2214):20210121. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2021.0121. Epub 2021 Nov 22.

DOI:10.1098/rsta.2021.0121
PMID:34802274
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8607147/
Abstract

We develop a statistical model for the testing of disease prevalence in a population. The model assumes a binary test result, positive or negative, but allows for biases in sample selection and both type I (false positive) and type II (false negative) testing errors. Our model also incorporates multiple test types and is able to distinguish between retesting and exclusion after testing. Our quantitative framework allows us to directly interpret testing results as a function of errors and biases. By applying our testing model to COVID-19 testing data and actual case data from specific jurisdictions, we are able to estimate and provide uncertainty quantification of indices that are crucial in a pandemic, such as disease prevalence and fatality ratios. This article is part of the theme issue 'Data science approach to infectious disease surveillance'.

摘要

我们开发了一个用于检测人群中疾病流行率的统计模型。该模型假设测试结果为二分类,阳性或阴性,但允许样本选择存在偏差,以及存在 I 类(假阳性)和 II 类(假阴性)测试错误。我们的模型还结合了多种测试类型,并能够区分测试后的重复测试和排除。我们的定量框架允许我们将测试结果直接解释为误差和偏差的函数。通过将我们的测试模型应用于 COVID-19 测试数据和特定管辖区的实际病例数据,我们能够估计和提供在大流行中至关重要的指标的不确定性量化,例如疾病流行率和病死率比。本文是“传染病监测数据科学方法”主题特刊的一部分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f09e/8607147/6edb686eb72c/rsta20210121f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f09e/8607147/c8116dbe5254/rsta20210121f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f09e/8607147/119a6a090ab7/rsta20210121f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f09e/8607147/126aa7e667fc/rsta20210121f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f09e/8607147/6edb686eb72c/rsta20210121f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f09e/8607147/c8116dbe5254/rsta20210121f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f09e/8607147/119a6a090ab7/rsta20210121f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f09e/8607147/126aa7e667fc/rsta20210121f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f09e/8607147/6edb686eb72c/rsta20210121f04.jpg

相似文献

1
A statistical model of COVID-19 testing in populations: effects of sampling bias andtesting errors.人群中 COVID-19 检测的统计模型:抽样偏差和检测误差的影响。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2022 Jan 10;380(2214):20210121. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2021.0121. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
2
A statistical model of COVID-19 testing in populations: effects of sampling bias and testing errors.人群中新冠病毒检测的统计模型:抽样偏差和检测误差的影响
medRxiv. 2021 May 26:2021.05.22.21257643. doi: 10.1101/2021.05.22.21257643.
3
Universal screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection: a rapid review.SARS-CoV-2 感染的普遍筛查:快速综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 15;9(9):CD013718. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013718.
4
Authors' response: Occupation and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk among workers during the first pandemic wave in Germany: potential for bias.作者回复:在德国首次大流行期间,工人的职业与 SARS-CoV-2 感染风险:潜在的偏见。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022 Sep 1;48(7):588-590. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4061. Epub 2022 Sep 25.
5
SARS-CoV-2 detection by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction testing: Analysis of false positive results and recommendations for quality control measures.实时逆转录聚合酶链反应检测 SARS-CoV-2:假阳性结果分析及质量控制措施建议。
Pathol Res Pract. 2021 Sep;225:153579. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2021.153579. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
6
Incorporating and addressing testing bias within estimates of epidemic dynamics for SARS-CoV-2.将检测偏差纳入 SARS-CoV-2 流行动力学估计并加以解决。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01196-4.
7
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.在普通人群中进行 SARS-CoV-2 监测的四种不同策略的有效性和成本效益(CoV-Surv 研究):一项关于集群随机、双因素对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z.
8
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7(7):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3.
9
Thoracic imaging tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19.用于诊断新型冠状病毒肺炎的胸部影像学检查
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 30;9:CD013639. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013639.pub2.
10
Time-sensitive testing pressures and COVID-19 outcomes: are socioeconomic inequalities over the first year of the pandemic explained by selection bias?时间敏感性测试压力与 COVID-19 结局:大流行第一年的社会经济不平等是否可以用选择偏差来解释?
BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 26;23(1):1863. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16767-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Potential for Bias in Prevalence Estimates when Not Accounting for Test Sensitivity and Specificity: A Systematic Review of COVID-19 Seroprevalence Studies.在不考虑检测敏感性和特异性时患病率估计中的偏倚可能性:COVID-19血清流行率研究的系统评价
Int J Public Health. 2025 Jul 15;70:1608343. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2025.1608343. eCollection 2025.
2
Aggregating multiple test results to improve medical decision-making.汇总多个检测结果以改善医疗决策。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 Jan 7;21(1):e1012749. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012749. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
Prevalence Estimation Methods for Time-Dependent Antibody Kinetics of Infected and Vaccinated Individuals: A Markov Chain Approach.

本文引用的文献

1
Classification under uncertainty: data analysis for diagnostic antibody testing.不确定性分类:诊断性抗体检测数据分析。
Math Med Biol. 2021 Aug 15;38(3):396-416. doi: 10.1093/imammb/dqab007.
2
Tracking excess mortality across countries during the COVID-19 pandemic with the World Mortality Dataset.利用世界死亡率数据集追踪 COVID-19 大流行期间各国的超额死亡率。
Elife. 2021 Jun 30;10:e69336. doi: 10.7554/eLife.69336.
3
Using excess deaths and testing statistics to determine COVID-19 mortalities.利用超额死亡人数和检测统计数据来确定新冠病毒死亡人数。
感染和接种个体时间依赖性抗体动力学的患病率估计方法:一种马尔可夫链方法。
Bull Math Biol. 2025 Jan 3;87(2):26. doi: 10.1007/s11538-024-01402-0.
4
COVID-19 Does Not Increase the Risk of Spontaneous Cervical Artery Dissection.新型冠状病毒肺炎不会增加自发性颈内动脉夹层的风险。
Cureus. 2023 Oct 23;15(10):e47524. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47524. eCollection 2023 Oct.
5
Bayesian sequential approach to monitor COVID-19 variants through test positivity rate from wastewater.基于贝叶斯的连续监测方法,通过污水中的检测阳性率监测 COVID-19 变异株。
mSystems. 2023 Aug 31;8(4):e0001823. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00018-23. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
6
Modeling in higher dimensions to improve diagnostic testing accuracy: Theory and examples for multiplex saliva-based SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays.高维建模以提高诊断检测准确性:基于多重唾液的 SARS-CoV-2 抗体检测的理论与实例。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 13;18(3):e0280823. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280823. eCollection 2023.
7
Operational analysis for COVID-19 testing: Determining the risk from asymptomatic infections.新冠病毒检测的运行分析:无症状感染的风险评估。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 13;18(2):e0281710. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281710. eCollection 2023.
8
Bayesian sequential approach to monitor COVID-19 variants through positivity rate from wastewater.通过废水阳性率监测新冠病毒变异株的贝叶斯序贯方法。
medRxiv. 2023 Jan 13:2023.01.10.23284365. doi: 10.1101/2023.01.10.23284365.
9
Modeling in higher dimensions to improve diagnostic testing accuracy: theory and examples for multiplex saliva-based SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays.高维建模以提高诊断测试准确性:基于多重唾液的SARS-CoV-2抗体检测的理论与实例
ArXiv. 2022 Jun 28:arXiv:2206.14316v2.
10
Optimal decision theory for diagnostic testing: Minimizing indeterminate classes with applications to saliva-based SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays.最优诊断检测决策理论:最小化不确定类别及其在基于唾液的 SARS-CoV-2 抗体检测中的应用。
Math Biosci. 2022 Sep;351:108858. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2022.108858. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
Eur J Epidemiol. 2021 May;36(5):545-558. doi: 10.1007/s10654-021-00748-2. Epub 2021 May 17.
4
Robust estimation of diagnostic rate and real incidence of COVID-19 for European policymakers.为欧洲政策制定者稳健估计 COVID-19 的诊断率和实际发病率。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 7;16(1):e0243701. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243701. eCollection 2021.
5
False-negative results of initial RT-PCR assays for COVID-19: A systematic review.COVID-19 初始 RT-PCR 检测的假阴性结果:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 10;15(12):e0242958. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242958. eCollection 2020.
6
Assessing the age specificity of infection fatality rates for COVID-19: systematic review, meta-analysis, and public policy implications.评估 COVID-19 感染病死率的年龄特异性:系统评价、荟萃分析及公共政策意义。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 Dec;35(12):1123-1138. doi: 10.1007/s10654-020-00698-1. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
7
Infection fatality rate of SARS-CoV2 in a super-spreading event in Germany.德国超级传播事件中 SARS-CoV2 的感染病死率。
Nat Commun. 2020 Nov 17;11(1):5829. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19509-y.
8
Substantial underestimation of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the United States.美国对 SARS-CoV-2 感染的严重低估。
Nat Commun. 2020 Sep 9;11(1):4507. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18272-4.
9
Timing of State and Territorial COVID-19 Stay-at-Home Orders and Changes in Population Movement - United States, March 1-May 31, 2020.美国 2020 年 3 月 1 日至 5 月 31 日各州和领地新冠疫情“居家令”发布时间及人口流动变化情况
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Sep 4;69(35):1198-1203. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6935a2.
10
Diagnostic accuracy of serological tests for covid-19: systematic review and meta-analysis.血清学检测在 COVID-19 诊断中的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2020 Jul 1;370:m2516. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2516.