Suppr超能文献

时间敏感性测试压力与 COVID-19 结局:大流行第一年的社会经济不平等是否可以用选择偏差来解释?

Time-sensitive testing pressures and COVID-19 outcomes: are socioeconomic inequalities over the first year of the pandemic explained by selection bias?

机构信息

MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK.

Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 26;23(1):1863. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16767-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are many ways in which selection bias might impact COVID-19 research. Here we focus on selection for receiving a polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) SARS-CoV-2 test and how known changes to selection pressures over time may bias research into COVID-19 infection.

METHODS

Using UK Biobank (N = 420,231; 55% female; mean age = 66.8 [SD = 8·11]) we estimate the association between socio-economic position (SEP) and (i) being tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection versus not being tested (ii) testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection versus testing negative and (iii) testing negative for SARS-CoV-2 infection versus not being tested. We construct four distinct time-periods between March 2020 and March 2021, representing distinct periods of testing pressures and lockdown restrictions and specify both time-stratified and combined models for each outcome. We explore potential selection bias by examining associations with positive and negative control exposures.

RESULTS

The association between more disadvantaged SEP and receiving a SARS-CoV-2 test attenuated over time. Compared to individuals with a degree, individuals whose highest educational qualification was a GCSE or equivalent had an OR of 1·27 (95% CI: 1·18 to 1·37) in March-May 2020 and 1·13 (95% CI: 1.·10 to 1·16) in January-March 2021. The magnitude of the association between educational attainment and testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection increased over the same period. For the equivalent comparison, the OR for testing positive increased from 1·25 (95% CI: 1·04 to 1·47), to 1·69 (95% CI: 1·55 to 1·83). We found little evidence of an association between control exposures, and any considered outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The association between SEP and SARS-CoV-2 testing changed over time, highlighting the potential of time-specific selection pressures to bias analyses of COVID-19. Positive and negative control analyses suggest that changes in the association between SEP and SARS-CoV-2 infection over time likely reflect true increases in socioeconomic inequalities.

摘要

背景

选择偏差可能会以多种方式影响 COVID-19 研究。在这里,我们重点关注因接受聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测 SARS-CoV-2 而产生的选择偏倚,以及随着时间的推移,选择压力的已知变化可能会对 COVID-19 感染研究产生的偏倚。

方法

我们使用英国生物银行(N=420231;55%为女性;平均年龄 66.8[SD=8.11]),估计社会经济地位(SEP)与(i)接受 SARS-CoV-2 感染检测与未接受检测之间,(ii)检测呈 SARS-CoV-2 感染阳性与检测呈 SARS-CoV-2 感染阴性之间,以及(iii)检测呈 SARS-CoV-2 感染阴性与未接受检测之间的关联。我们构建了 2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 3 月之间的四个不同时间段,代表不同的检测压力和封锁限制时期,并为每个结果指定了时间分层和组合模型。我们通过检查与阳性和阴性对照暴露的关联来探索潜在的选择偏倚。

结果

在接受 SARS-CoV-2 检测方面,社会经济地位越低与接受检测的关联随着时间的推移而减弱。与具有学位的个体相比,最高教育程度为普通中等教育证书或同等学历的个体在 2020 年 3 月至 5 月期间的优势比为 1.27(95%CI:1.18 至 1.37),而在 2021 年 1 月至 3 月期间为 1.13(95%CI:1.10 至 1.16)。同期,教育程度与 SARS-CoV-2 感染检测呈阳性之间的关联幅度增大。对于等效比较,检测呈阳性的优势比从 1.25(95%CI:1.04 至 1.47)增加到 1.69(95%CI:1.55 至 1.83)。我们几乎没有发现对照暴露与任何考虑的结果之间存在关联的证据。

结论

社会经济地位与 SARS-CoV-2 检测之间的关联随时间发生变化,这突显了特定时间的选择压力有可能对 COVID-19 分析产生偏倚。阳性和阴性对照分析表明,社会经济地位与 SARS-CoV-2 感染之间的关联随时间发生变化,可能反映了社会经济不平等的真实增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d896/10521522/ddb984bf4a7e/12889_2023_16767_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验