• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前列腺癌主动监测随访丢失风险。

Risk of Becoming Lost to Follow-up During Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Wayne State University, School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.

Department of Urology, University of Michigan, School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 2018 Dec;74(6):704-707. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2018.08.010
PMID:30177290
Abstract

Active surveillance (AS) has emerged as the preferred management strategy for many men with prostate cancer (PC); however, insufficient longitudinal monitoring may increase the risk of poor outcomes. We sought to determine rates of patients becoming lost to follow-up (LTFU) and associated risk factors in a large AS cohort. The Michigan Urologic Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MUSIC) maintains a prospective registry of PC patients from 44 academic and community urology practices. Over a 6-yr period (2011-2017), we identified patients managed with AS. LTFU was defined as any 18-mo period where no pertinent surveillance testing was entered in the registry. With a median surveillance period of 32 mo, the estimated 2-yr LTFU-free probability calculated by Kaplan-Meier method was 90% (95% confidence interval [CI]=89-92%). Both African American race (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.77, 95% CI=1.81-4.24) and Charlson comorbidity index ≥1 (HR: 1.55, 95% CI=1.08-2.23) were independently associated with increased risk of LTFU. There was variability in rates of estimated 2-yr LTFU-free survival across MUSIC practices, ranging from 52% (95% CI=21-100%) to 99% (95% CI=97-100%), with a median of 96% (interquartile range: 94-98%), although this did not reach statistical significance (p=0.076). These data reveal opportunities for urology practices to identify systems to reduce rates of LTFU and improve the long-term safety of AS. PATIENT SUMMARY: With a median observation period of 32 mo, an estimated 10% of patients will be lost to follow-up at the 2 yr time point while on AS. African American men and generally unhealthy patients were at increased risk, and there was variability from one urology practice to another. There is ample opportunity to improve the quality of the performance of AS.

摘要

主动监测 (AS) 已成为许多前列腺癌 (PC) 患者首选的治疗策略; 然而,纵向监测不足可能会增加不良预后的风险。我们旨在确定在大型 AS 队列中患者失访 (LTFU) 的发生率及其相关的危险因素。密歇根州泌尿科手术改进协作组 (MUSIC) 从 44 个学术和社区泌尿科诊所维护一个前列腺癌患者的前瞻性登记处。在 6 年期间 (2011-2017 年),我们确定了接受 AS 治疗的患者。LTFU 的定义为在注册表中没有任何相关监测测试输入的任何 18 个月期间。在中位监测期为 32 个月时,通过 Kaplan-Meier 方法计算的估计 2 年 LTFU 无事件率为 90% (95%置信区间 [CI] = 89-92%)。非裔美国人种族 (风险比 [HR]:2.77,95%CI=1.81-4.24) 和 Charlson 合并症指数≥1 (HR:1.55,95%CI=1.08-2.23) 均与 LTFU 风险增加独立相关。在 MUSIC 实践中,估计的 2 年 LTFU 无事件生存率的变化范围为 52% (95%CI=21-100%) 至 99% (95%CI=97-100%),中位数为 96% (四分位距:94-98%),尽管这没有达到统计学意义 (p=0.076)。这些数据揭示了泌尿科实践有机会确定减少 LTFU 发生率和提高 AS 长期安全性的系统。患者总结:在中位观察期为 32 个月时,估计有 10%的患者在接受 AS 治疗 2 年后会失访。非裔美国男性和一般不健康的患者风险增加,而且每个泌尿科实践之间存在差异。有充分的机会改善 AS 的执行质量。

相似文献

1
Risk of Becoming Lost to Follow-up During Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.前列腺癌主动监测随访丢失风险。
Eur Urol. 2018 Dec;74(6):704-707. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
2
Contemporary use of initial active surveillance among men in Michigan with low-risk prostate cancer.密歇根州低危前列腺癌男性中初始主动监测的当代应用。
Eur Urol. 2015 Jan;67(1):44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.024. Epub 2014 Aug 24.
3
Association Between African American Race and Clinical Outcomes in Men Treated for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer With Active Surveillance.非裔美国人种族与接受主动监测治疗低危前列腺癌男性的临床结局之间的关联。
JAMA. 2020 Nov 3;324(17):1747-1754. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.17020.
4
Variation in Guideline Concordant Active Surveillance Followup in Diverse Urology Practices.不同泌尿外科实践中指南一致的主动监测随访的差异。
J Urol. 2017 Mar;197(3 Pt 1):621-626. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.09.071. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
5
Association of Prostate-Specific Antigen Velocity With Clinical Progression Among African American and Non-Hispanic White Men Treated for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer With Active Surveillance.前列腺特异性抗原速度与接受主动监测治疗低危前列腺癌的非裔美国男性和非西班牙裔白种男性临床进展的相关性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e219452. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.9452.
6
Race/ethnicity and the intensity of medical monitoring under 'watchful waiting' for prostate cancer.种族/族裔与前列腺癌“观察等待”期间的医学监测强度
Med Care. 2004 Mar;42(3):239-50. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000117361.61444.71.
7
Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: Are We Failing Latino Patients at a Large Safety Net Hospital?主动监测前列腺癌:在一家大型医疗保障医院,我们是否让拉美裔患者失望了?
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018 Aug;16(4):e719-e727. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.01.018. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
8
Outcome following active surveillance of men with screen-detected prostate cancer. Results from the Göteborg randomised population-based prostate cancer screening trial.主动监测经筛检发现前列腺癌男性的结局。哥德堡随机人群前列腺癌筛查试验的结果。
Eur Urol. 2013 Jan;63(1):101-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.08.066. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
9
Racial Disparities in Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.前列腺癌主动监测中的种族差异。
J Urol. 2017 Feb;197(2):342-349. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.08.104. Epub 2016 Sep 3.
10
Active Surveillance of Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer: Long-term Outcomes from a Large Prospective Cohort.1 级前列腺癌的主动监测:来自大型前瞻性队列的长期结果。
Eur Urol. 2020 Jun;77(6):675-682. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.12.017. Epub 2020 Jan 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Active Surveillance in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Review of the Current Data.中危前列腺癌的主动监测:当前数据综述
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Aug 27;14(17):4161. doi: 10.3390/cancers14174161.
2
Intensity of observation with active surveillance or watchful waiting in men with prostate cancer in the United States.美国男性前列腺癌主动监测或密切观察的观察强度。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023 Jun;26(2):395-402. doi: 10.1038/s41391-022-00580-z. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
3
Five-year follow-up study of a population-based prospective cohort of men with low-risk prostate cancer: the treatment options in prostate cancer study (TOPCS): study protocol.
基于人群的低危前列腺癌男性前瞻性队列的 5 年随访研究:前列腺癌治疗选择研究(TOPCS):研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 21;12(2):e056675. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056675.
4
Factors associated with loss to follow-up after radiation therapy for head and neck cancer.头颈部癌症放射治疗后随访丢失的相关因素。
Head Neck. 2022 Apr;44(4):943-951. doi: 10.1002/hed.26986. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
5
Can the LACE index help identify uninsured patients at risk of loss to follow-up during a pharmacist-led transitions of care program?在药师主导的过渡期医疗护理计划中,LACE 指数能否帮助识别出无保险且有随访脱落风险的患者?
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2022 Mar-Apr;62(2):564-568. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2021.11.001. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
6
Charlson Comorbidity Index: An Inaccurate Predictor of Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spinal Fusion Outcomes.查尔森合并症指数:微创腰椎融合术结果的不准确预测指标
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Aug;15(4):770-779. doi: 10.14444/8099. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
7
Variation in the Use of Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Across US Census Regions.美国人口普查区域间低风险前列腺癌主动监测使用情况的差异。
Front Oncol. 2021 May 19;11:644885. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.644885. eCollection 2021.
8
Receipt of Guideline-Recommended Surveillance in a Population-Based Cohort of Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Active Surveillance.在接受主动监测的前列腺癌患者的基于人群的队列中,接受指南推荐的监测的情况。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Jul 1;110(3):712-715. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.01.014. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
9
Defining and Measuring Adherence in Observational Studies Assessing Outcomes of Real-world Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.在评估前列腺癌真实世界主动监测结果的观察性研究中定义和衡量依从性:一项系统评价
Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Apr;4(2):192-201. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.06.009. Epub 2019 Jul 6.
10
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is Associated with Increased Medicare Spending in Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance.多参数磁共振成像与前列腺癌主动监测中医疗保险支出增加相关。
Eur Urol Focus. 2020 Mar 15;6(2):242-248. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.04.008. Epub 2019 Apr 25.