Department of Urology, Wayne State University, School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
Department of Urology, University of Michigan, School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Eur Urol. 2018 Dec;74(6):704-707. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
Active surveillance (AS) has emerged as the preferred management strategy for many men with prostate cancer (PC); however, insufficient longitudinal monitoring may increase the risk of poor outcomes. We sought to determine rates of patients becoming lost to follow-up (LTFU) and associated risk factors in a large AS cohort. The Michigan Urologic Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MUSIC) maintains a prospective registry of PC patients from 44 academic and community urology practices. Over a 6-yr period (2011-2017), we identified patients managed with AS. LTFU was defined as any 18-mo period where no pertinent surveillance testing was entered in the registry. With a median surveillance period of 32 mo, the estimated 2-yr LTFU-free probability calculated by Kaplan-Meier method was 90% (95% confidence interval [CI]=89-92%). Both African American race (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.77, 95% CI=1.81-4.24) and Charlson comorbidity index ≥1 (HR: 1.55, 95% CI=1.08-2.23) were independently associated with increased risk of LTFU. There was variability in rates of estimated 2-yr LTFU-free survival across MUSIC practices, ranging from 52% (95% CI=21-100%) to 99% (95% CI=97-100%), with a median of 96% (interquartile range: 94-98%), although this did not reach statistical significance (p=0.076). These data reveal opportunities for urology practices to identify systems to reduce rates of LTFU and improve the long-term safety of AS. PATIENT SUMMARY: With a median observation period of 32 mo, an estimated 10% of patients will be lost to follow-up at the 2 yr time point while on AS. African American men and generally unhealthy patients were at increased risk, and there was variability from one urology practice to another. There is ample opportunity to improve the quality of the performance of AS.
主动监测 (AS) 已成为许多前列腺癌 (PC) 患者首选的治疗策略; 然而,纵向监测不足可能会增加不良预后的风险。我们旨在确定在大型 AS 队列中患者失访 (LTFU) 的发生率及其相关的危险因素。密歇根州泌尿科手术改进协作组 (MUSIC) 从 44 个学术和社区泌尿科诊所维护一个前列腺癌患者的前瞻性登记处。在 6 年期间 (2011-2017 年),我们确定了接受 AS 治疗的患者。LTFU 的定义为在注册表中没有任何相关监测测试输入的任何 18 个月期间。在中位监测期为 32 个月时,通过 Kaplan-Meier 方法计算的估计 2 年 LTFU 无事件率为 90% (95%置信区间 [CI] = 89-92%)。非裔美国人种族 (风险比 [HR]:2.77,95%CI=1.81-4.24) 和 Charlson 合并症指数≥1 (HR:1.55,95%CI=1.08-2.23) 均与 LTFU 风险增加独立相关。在 MUSIC 实践中,估计的 2 年 LTFU 无事件生存率的变化范围为 52% (95%CI=21-100%) 至 99% (95%CI=97-100%),中位数为 96% (四分位距:94-98%),尽管这没有达到统计学意义 (p=0.076)。这些数据揭示了泌尿科实践有机会确定减少 LTFU 发生率和提高 AS 长期安全性的系统。患者总结:在中位观察期为 32 个月时,估计有 10%的患者在接受 AS 治疗 2 年后会失访。非裔美国男性和一般不健康的患者风险增加,而且每个泌尿科实践之间存在差异。有充分的机会改善 AS 的执行质量。