Vera Espinoza Marcia, Prieto Rosas Victoria, Zapata Gisela P, Gandini Luciana, Fernández de la Reguera Alethia, Herrera Gioconda, López Villamil Stephanie, Zamora Gómez Cristina María, Blouin Cécile, Montiel Camila, Cabezas Gálvez Gabriela, Palla Irene
School of Geography, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Rd., London, E1 4NS UK.
Programa de Población, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de la República, Constituyente 1502, CP 11100 Montevideo, Uruguay.
Comp Migr Stud. 2021;9(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s40878-021-00265-x. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
The COVID-19 health crisis has put to the test Latin America's already precarious social protection systems. This paper comparatively examines what type of social protection has been provided, by whom, and to what extent migrant and refugee populations have been included in these programmes in seven countries of the region during the COVID-19 pandemic, between March and December 2020. We develop a typology of models of social protection highlighting the assemblages of actors, different modes of protection and the emerging migrants' subjectification in Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, Peru, and Uruguay in relation to Non-Contributory Social Transfer (NCST) programmes and other actions undertaken by state and non-state actors. The analysis is based on 85 semi-structured interviews with representatives of national and local governments, International Organisations, Civil Society Organisations, and migrant-led organisations across 16 cities, and a systematic review of regulatory frameworks in the country-case studies. The proposed typology shows broad heterogeneity and complexity regarding different degrees of inclusion of migrant and refugee populations, particularly in pre-existing and new NCST programmes. These actions are furthering notions of migrant protection that are contingent and crisis-driven, imposing temporal limitations that often selectively exclude migrants based on legal status. It also brings to the fore the path-dependent nature of policies and practices of exclusion/inclusion in the region, which impact on migrants' effective access to social and economic rights, while shaping the broader dynamics of migration governance in the region.
新冠疫情引发的健康危机对拉丁美洲本就脆弱的社会保护体系进行了考验。本文比较研究了在2020年3月至12月新冠疫情期间,该地区七个国家提供了何种类型的社会保护、由谁提供以及移徙者和难民群体在这些项目中的纳入程度。我们构建了社会保护模式类型学,突出了巴西、智利、哥伦比亚、厄瓜多尔、墨西哥、秘鲁和乌拉圭在非缴费型社会转移(NCST)项目以及国家和非国家行为体采取的其他行动方面的行为体组合、不同保护模式以及新出现的移民主体化情况。该分析基于对16个城市的国家和地方政府代表、国际组织、民间社会组织以及移民主导组织的85次半结构化访谈,以及对国别案例研究中的监管框架进行的系统回顾。所提出的类型学显示,在移徙者和难民群体的不同纳入程度方面存在广泛的异质性和复杂性,特别是在既有的和新的NCST项目中。这些行动正在推进基于偶然情况和危机驱动的移民保护观念,施加了时间限制,这些限制往往基于法律地位有选择地排斥移民。它还凸显了该地区排斥/包容政策和做法的路径依赖性质,这影响了移民有效获得社会和经济权利,同时塑造了该地区移民治理的更广泛动态。