Suppr超能文献

甲状腺滤泡状癌与滤泡性腺瘤的超声造影及常规超声的Logistic回归分析

Logistic regression analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and conventional ultrasound of follicular thyroid carcinoma and follicular adenoma.

作者信息

Wu Qiong, Qu Yanhui, Li Yi, Liu Yilun, Shen Jian, Wang Yan

机构信息

Department of Ultrasound in Medicine, Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Gland Surg. 2021 Oct;10(10):2890-2900. doi: 10.21037/gs-21-535.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC) is prone to recurrence and hematogenous metastasis, preoperative accurate diagnosis is still needed to help clinicians select the best surgical methods to improve the prognosis of patients. The aim of this study was to find specific conventional ultrasound (US) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) characteristics of FTC and to explore their diagnostic value in the differential diagnosis between FTC and follicular adenoma (FA).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 258 thyroid follicular neoplasms (172 FAs and 86 FTCs) in 244 consecutive patients who underwent preoperative conventional US, and 72 of them underwent both conventional US and CEUS. Sonograms were reviewed in consensus by two experienced radiologists for various conventional US and CEUS features. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine independent risk factors for FTC.

RESULTS

Independent risk factors of conventional US for FTC were heterogenicity (OR =7.477, 95% CI: 2.848-19.629), unevenly thick halo (OR =5.643, 95% CI: 3.234-9.848) and calcifications (OR =1.748, 95% CI: 1.098-2.783). While independent risk factors determined with the combination of CEUS and conventional US were unevenly thick halo (OR =5.770, 95% CI: 1.310-25.409) and absent or irregular rim enhancement (OR =27.000, 95% CI: 2.445-298.178). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the final two logistic regression models was 0.835 and 0.838.

CONCLUSIONS

Conventional US is an efficient diagnostic tool in the differential diagnosis of FTC and FA to help clinicians in making appropriate decisions while CEUS failed to provide additional diagnostic value in the study, thus the value of CEUS remains to be verified by further studies with larger sample sizes.

摘要

背景

滤泡性甲状腺癌(FTC)易于复发和血行转移,术前仍需要准确诊断以帮助临床医生选择最佳手术方法来改善患者预后。本研究的目的是找出FTC的特定常规超声(US)和超声造影(CEUS)特征,并探讨它们在FTC与滤泡性腺瘤(FA)鉴别诊断中的诊断价值。

方法

本回顾性研究纳入了244例连续患者的258个甲状腺滤泡性肿瘤(172个FA和86个FTC),这些患者均接受了术前常规US检查,其中72例同时接受了常规US和CEUS检查。由两名经验丰富的放射科医生共同对超声图像进行评估,以确定各种常规US和CEUS特征。进行多因素逻辑回归分析以确定FTC的独立危险因素。

结果

常规US诊断FTC的独立危险因素为异质性(OR = 7.477,95%CI:2.848 - 19.629)、晕圈不均匀增厚(OR = 5.643,95%CI:3.234 - 9.848)和钙化(OR = 1.748,95%CI:1.098 - 2.783)。而CEUS与常规US联合确定的独立危险因素为晕圈不均匀增厚(OR = 5.770,95%CI:1.310 - 25.409)和边缘强化缺失或不规则(OR = 27.000,95%CI:2.445 - 298.178)。最终两个逻辑回归模型的受试者工作特征曲线下面积分别为0.835和0.838。

结论

常规US是FTC与FA鉴别诊断的有效诊断工具,有助于临床医生做出适当决策,而在本研究中CEUS未能提供额外的诊断价值,因此CEUS的价值仍有待更大样本量的进一步研究验证。

相似文献

4
The Value of Sonography in Distinguishing Follicular Thyroid Carcinoma from Adenoma.
Cancer Manag Res. 2021 May 17;13:3991-4002. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S307166. eCollection 2021.
5
Ultrasonographic features for differentiating follicular thyroid carcinoma and follicular adenoma.
Asian J Surg. 2020 Jan;43(1):339-346. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2019.04.016. Epub 2019 Jun 8.
8
Diagnostic value of an interpretable machine learning model based on clinical ultrasound features for follicular thyroid carcinoma.
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Sep 1;14(9):6311-6324. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-601. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
10
Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Preoperative Evaluation of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Invasiveness.
Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 14;11:795302. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.795302. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

3
Prediction of Follicular Thyroid Neoplasm and Malignancy of Follicular Thyroid Neoplasm Using Multiparametric MRI.
J Imaging Inform Med. 2024 Dec;37(6):2852-2864. doi: 10.1007/s10278-024-01102-0. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
6
Adult-type rhabdomyoma of the thyroid: A case report.
Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 18;13:1108133. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1108133. eCollection 2023.
7
Value of CEUS features in diagnosing thyroid nodules with halo sign on B-mode ultrasound.
BMC Med Imaging. 2023 Jan 21;23(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12880-023-00966-y.
8
Case report: Large follicular thyroid carcinoma with multiple cervical lymph node metastases.
Front Surg. 2022 Aug 23;9:995859. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.995859. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Ultrasonographic features for differentiating follicular thyroid carcinoma and follicular adenoma.
Asian J Surg. 2020 Jan;43(1):339-346. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2019.04.016. Epub 2019 Jun 8.
2
Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in solid thyroid nodules with and without enhancement.
Endocrine. 2016 Aug;53(2):480-8. doi: 10.1007/s12020-015-0850-0. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
4
Sonographic features of thyroid follicular carcinoma in comparison with thyroid follicular adenoma.
J Ultrasound Med. 2014 Feb;33(2):221-7. doi: 10.7863/ultra.33.2.221.
5
The accuracy of thyroid nodule ultrasound to predict thyroid cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Apr;99(4):1253-63. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-2928. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
6
Thyroid neoplasms of follicular cell derivation: a simplified approach.
Semin Diagn Pathol. 2013 Aug;30(3):178-85. doi: 10.1053/j.semdp.2013.06.004.
8
Image reporting and characterization system for ultrasound features of thyroid nodules: multicentric Korean retrospective study.
Korean J Radiol. 2013 Jan-Feb;14(1):110-7. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2013.14.1.110. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
9
Predictors of malignancy in patients with cytologically suspicious thyroid nodules.
Thyroid. 2011 Nov;21(11):1191-8. doi: 10.1089/thy.2011.0146. Epub 2011 Oct 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验