Bir Courtney, Widmar Nicole Olynk
Oklahoma State University, Dept. of Agricultural Economics, 529 Ag Hall, Stillwater, OK, USA.
Purdue University, Dept. of Agricultural Economics, 403 West State Street West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Soc Sci Humanit Open. 2021;4(1):100229. doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100229. Epub 2021 Nov 13.
Human behavior, such as wearing a mask in public, affects the trajectory of the COVID-19 pandemic. A nationally representative survey of 1198 U.S. residents was used to study demographics, perceptions, and stated beliefs of residents who indicated they believe masks have a role in society in response to COVID-19 but self-reported not wearing masks in at least one public place studied. Individuals who believed wearing masks protected others were more likely to report voluntarily wearing them, providing possible evidence of altruism. Perceiving social pressure negatively impacted the probability of voluntary mask wearing amongst those who believed masks have a role in society, suggesting social shaming may not increase compliance among these individuals. Free-riding is one possible explanation for why an individual respondent may self-report belief that mask wearing has a role in society and simultaneously self-report not voluntarily wearing a mask in public locations. Alternatively, incomplete knowledge, confusion about the role of masks in controlling spread of COVID-19, or fatigue are all possible explanations for why adults who believe masks play a role demonstrate less than optimal compliance themselves with mask wearing. Promotion of altruism, rather than social shaming, is more likely to increase mask wearing based on this analysis. Tactics to improve public health initiative compliance and participation may change throughout the duration of the pandemic and/or may differ between segments of the population. Increased understanding of human behavior as it relates to mask wearing can inform public health communications and construction of incentive-aligned messaging to improve public health-related behaviors and associated outcomes.
人类行为,比如在公共场合佩戴口罩,会影响新冠疫情的发展轨迹。一项对1198名美国居民的全国代表性调查被用于研究那些表示认为口罩在应对新冠疫情中对社会有作用,但自我报告在至少一个所研究的公共场所未佩戴口罩的居民的人口统计学特征、认知和陈述的信念。那些认为佩戴口罩能保护他人的人更有可能报告自己会自愿佩戴口罩,这为利他主义提供了可能的证据。对于那些认为口罩在社会中有作用的人来说,感知到社会压力会对其自愿佩戴口罩的可能性产生负面影响,这表明社会羞辱可能不会增加这些人的依从性。搭便车是个体受访者自我报告认为佩戴口罩对社会有作用但同时又自我报告在公共场所不自愿佩戴口罩的一种可能解释。或者,知识不完整、对口罩在控制新冠病毒传播中的作用感到困惑,或疲劳,都是那些认为口罩有作用的成年人自己佩戴口罩的依从性未达最佳水平的可能解释。基于这一分析,促进利他主义而非社会羞辱更有可能增加口罩佩戴率。在疫情期间,提高公共卫生倡议依从性和参与度的策略可能会有所变化,和/或在不同人群中可能会有所不同。对与佩戴口罩相关的人类行为的更多理解可以为公共卫生宣传以及构建激励一致的信息提供参考,以改善与公共卫生相关的行为及相关结果。