Nilsson P, Rydmarker S, Grenner J
Department of Occupational Audiology, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgren Hospital, Sweden.
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1987;441:45-58. doi: 10.3109/00016488709124800.
It has been proposed that impulse noise and continuous noise affect the inner ear differently and investigations have found impulse noise to be harmful to both the inner hair cells and the outer hair cells. Scanning electron microscopy and non-standard methods for statistical analysis have facilitated the evaluation of different types of morphological changes after exposure to various kinds of noise. Morphological differences were compared in groups of guinea pigs exposed to either impulse noise or continuous noise of equivalent duration, spectral content and energy. Functionally, the groups also showed similar threshold elevations. In order to separate the two groups, subtle hair cell changes were recorded and evaluated either alone, in combination with each other or with hair cell loss. It was found that both the inner hair cells and the outer hair cells were affected differently by impulse noise than by continuous noise even though the auditory thresholds were similar.
有人提出,脉冲噪声和连续噪声对内耳的影响不同,研究发现脉冲噪声对内毛细胞和外毛细胞都有害。扫描电子显微镜和非标准统计分析方法有助于评估暴露于各种噪声后不同类型的形态变化。对暴露于等效持续时间、频谱内容和能量的脉冲噪声或连续噪声的豚鼠组进行了形态学差异比较。在功能上,这些组也表现出相似的阈值升高。为了区分这两组,单独、相互结合或与毛细胞损失一起记录和评估了细微的毛细胞变化。结果发现,即使听觉阈值相似,脉冲噪声对内毛细胞和外毛细胞的影响也与连续噪声不同。