Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
Department of Theatre, Drama, and Contemporary Dance, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 22;16(11):e0260267. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260267. eCollection 2021.
Pedestrians with low vision are at risk of injury when hazards, such as steps and posts, have low visibility. This study aims at validating the software implementation of a computational model that estimates hazard visibility. The model takes as input a photorealistic 3D rendering of an architectural space, and the acuity and contrast sensitivity of a low-vision observer, and outputs estimates of the visibility of hazards in the space. Our experiments explored whether the model could predict the likelihood of observers correctly identifying hazards. In Experiment 1, we tested fourteen normally sighted subjects with blur goggles that simulated moderate or severe acuity reduction. In Experiment 2, we tested ten low-vision subjects with moderate to severe acuity reduction. Subjects viewed computer-generated images of a walkway containing five possible targets ahead-big step-up, big step-down, small step-up, small step-down, or a flat continuation. Each subject saw these stimuli with variations of lighting and viewpoint in 250 trials and indicated which of the five targets was present. The model generated a score on each trial that estimated the visibility of the target. If the model is valid, the scores should be predictive of how accurately the subjects identified the targets. We used logistic regression to examine the correlation between the scores and the participants' responses. For twelve of the fourteen normally sighted subjects with artificial acuity reduction and all ten low-vision subjects, there was a significant relationship between the scores and the participant's probability of correct identification. These experiments provide evidence for the validity of a computational model that predicts the visibility of architectural hazards. It lays the foundation for future validation of this hazard evaluation tool, which may be useful for architects to assess the visibility of hazards in their designs, thereby enhancing the accessibility of spaces for people with low vision.
低视力行人在遇到障碍物(如台阶和柱子)时,由于这些障碍物的可见度低,他们有受伤的风险。本研究旨在验证一种计算模型的软件实现,该模型用于估计障碍物的可见度。该模型的输入是建筑空间的逼真 3D 渲染图,以及低视力观察者的视力和对比敏感度,输出是空间中障碍物可见度的估计值。我们的实验探讨了该模型是否可以正确预测观察者识别障碍物的可能性。在实验 1 中,我们测试了 14 名视力正常的被试者,他们戴着模拟中度或重度视力下降的模糊眼镜。在实验 2 中,我们测试了 10 名中度至重度视力下降的低视力被试者。被试者观看了包含五个可能目标(大台阶上升、大台阶下降、小台阶上升、小台阶下降或平坦延伸)的人行道的计算机生成图像。每个被试者在 250 次试验中看到了这些带有不同光照和视角的刺激,并指出了五个目标中存在的目标。模型在每次试验中生成一个估计目标可见度的分数。如果模型有效,那么分数应该可以预测被试者识别目标的准确性。我们使用逻辑回归来检查分数和被试者反应之间的相关性。对于 14 名视力正常的人工视力下降的被试者中的 12 名和所有 10 名低视力被试者,分数与被试者正确识别的概率之间存在显著关系。这些实验为预测建筑障碍物可见度的计算模型的有效性提供了证据。这为未来验证这种危险评估工具奠定了基础,该工具可能对建筑师评估其设计中障碍物的可见度有用,从而提高低视力人群对空间的可访问性。