Xiong Ying-Zi, Kwon MiYoung, Bittner Ava K, Virgili Gianni, Giacomelli Giovanni, Legge Gordon E
Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota , Minneapolis, Minnesota , United States.
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham, Alabama , United States.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020 Jun 3;61(6):40. doi: 10.1167/iovs.61.6.40.
Visual acuity (VA) and contrast sensitivity (CS) characterize different aspects of visual function. Whereas VA is a standard test in routine eye exams and clinical trials, CS is often not included. We investigated the pathology-specific dissociation between VA and CS by quantifying and comparing the relationship between these two measures in common ocular pathologies.
VA and CS data were assembled from 1113 subjects, including groups with cataract (n = 450), age-related macular degeneration (AMD; n = 232), glaucoma (n = 100), retinitis pigmentosa (RP; n = 87), and normal ocular health (n = 244). VA and CS were measured by the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart and Pelli-Robson chart, respectively.
Even when VA was relatively normal (<0.3 logMAR), the four ocular pathology groups showed quantitatively different mean CS deficits relative to normal controls, ranging from -0.01 log units for cataract to 0.23 log units for RP. When the entire range of VA was considered, the corresponding deficits in CS were noticeably different across these four groups, being least for cataract and progressively more severe for glaucoma, AMD, and RP. For every 1.0 logMAR loss of VA, the corresponding deficit in CS ranged from 0.22 logCS for cataract to 0.97 logCS for RP.
The quantitative relationship between VA and CS depends on the ocular pathology. CS appears to provide valuable complementary information to VA in the early detection of eye disease and when evaluating visual impairment.
视力(VA)和对比敏感度(CS)表征视觉功能的不同方面。虽然VA是常规眼科检查和临床试验中的标准测试,但CS通常不被纳入。我们通过量化和比较常见眼部疾病中这两种测量指标之间的关系,研究了VA和CS之间的病理特异性分离。
收集了1113名受试者的VA和CS数据,包括白内障组(n = 450)、年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD;n = 232)、青光眼组(n = 100)、视网膜色素变性(RP;n = 87)以及眼部健康正常组(n = 244)。VA和CS分别通过早期糖尿病视网膜病变研究图表和佩利-罗布森图表进行测量。
即使VA相对正常(<0.3 logMAR),与正常对照组相比,四个眼部疾病组的平均CS缺陷在数量上也存在差异,从白内障的-0.01 log单位到RP的0.23 log单位不等。当考虑VA的整个范围时,这四组CS的相应缺陷明显不同,白内障组最小,青光眼、AMD和RP组则逐渐更严重。VA每损失1.0 logMAR,CS的相应缺陷范围从白内障的0.22 logCS到RP的0.97 logCS。
VA和CS之间的定量关系取决于眼部疾病。在眼部疾病的早期检测和评估视力损害时,CS似乎能为VA提供有价值的补充信息。