Kim Gyo Wun, Chang Won Jun, Kang Ji Eun, Kim Hee Ju, Yeom Geun Young
School of Advanced Materials Science and Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, 440-746, Republic of Korea.
SKKU Advanced Institute of Nano Technology (SAINT), Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, 440-746, Republic of Korea.
Nanotechnology. 2021 Dec 9;33(9). doi: 10.1088/1361-6528/ac3bee.
Even though EUV lithography has the advantage of implenting a finer pattern compared to ArF immersion lithography due to the use of 13.5 nm instead of 193 nm as the wavelength of the light source, due to the low energy of EUV light source, EUV resist has a thinner thickness than conventional ArF resist. EUV resist having such a thin thickness is more vulnerable to radiation damage received during the etching because of its low etch resistance and also tends to have a problem of low etch selectivity. In this study, the radiation damage to EUV resist during etching of hardmask materials such as SiN, SiO, etc using CFgas was compared between neutral beam etching (NBE) and ion beam etching (IBE). When NBE was used, after the etching of 20 nm thick EUV resist, the line edge roughness increase and the critical dimension change of EUV resist were reduced by ∼1/3 and ∼1/2, respectively, compared to those by IBE. Also, at that EUV etch depth, the root mean square surface roughness value of EUV resist etched by NBE was ∼2/3 compared to that by IBE on the average. It was also confirmed that the etching selectivity between SiO, SiN, etc and EUV resist was higher for NBE compared to IBE. The less damage to the EUV resist and the higher etch selectivity of materials such as SiNand SiOover EUV resist for NBE compared to IBE are believed to be related to the no potential energy released by the neutralization of the ions during the etching by NBE.
尽管极紫外光刻(EUV光刻)由于使用13.5纳米而非193纳米作为光源波长,与ArF浸没光刻相比具有实现更精细图案的优势,但由于EUV光源能量低,EUV光刻胶的厚度比传统ArF光刻胶更薄。这种厚度很薄的EUV光刻胶在蚀刻过程中因抗蚀刻性低而更容易受到辐射损伤,并且还往往存在蚀刻选择性低的问题。在本研究中,比较了在使用CF气体蚀刻诸如SiN、SiO等硬掩膜材料时,中性束蚀刻(NBE)和离子束蚀刻(IBE)对EUV光刻胶的辐射损伤。当使用NBE时,在蚀刻20纳米厚的EUV光刻胶后,与IBE相比,EUV光刻胶的线边缘粗糙度增加和关键尺寸变化分别减少了约1/3和约1/2。此外,在该EUV蚀刻深度下,NBE蚀刻的EUV光刻胶的均方根表面粗糙度值平均约为IBE蚀刻的EUV光刻胶的2/3。还证实,与IBE相比,NBE对SiO、SiN等与EUV光刻胶之间的蚀刻选择性更高。与IBE相比,NBE对EUV光刻胶的损伤较小,以及对诸如SiN和SiO等材料相对于EUV光刻胶具有更高的蚀刻选择性,被认为与NBE蚀刻过程中离子中和不释放势能有关。