• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

是什么保护我们免受 COVID-19 威胁?文化严谨性很重要。

What protects us against the COVID-19 threat? Cultural tightness matters.

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, No.19 Xinjiekouwai Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100875, China.

Baotou School Affiliated To Beijing Normal University, Inner Mongolia, China.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2021 Nov 22;21(1):2139. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12161-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-021-12161-1
PMID:34809585
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8607057/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The only previous studies that formulated a theoretical model of epidemics for psychological response relative to cultural perspectives have focused on the role of individualism-collectivism and have omitted analysis of tightness-looseness. This study explored the role of cultural tightness in relation to psychological disorders during the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

We recruited 1827 Chinese adolescents (M = 18.16 ± 2.23 years, 53.3% female) to participate a cross-sectional survey. Participants completed a series of questionnaires, including the scales of cultural tightness, risk perception of COVID-19 pandemic, perceived protection efficacy, anxiety and depression. A latent moderated structural equations model was used to analyse the mediating and moderating effects of risk perception regarding COVID-19, cultural tightness and perceived protection efficacy on psychological disorders.

RESULTS

The results showed that greater risk perception of COVID-19 predicted greater psychological disorders, however cultural tightness moderated this positive relationship. The increase in psychological disorders with risk perception regarding COVID-19 was less pronounced among people who lived in tighter cultural areas. In addition, this moderating effect of cultural tightness was further mediated by perceived protection efficacy; that is, tight culture protects against psychological disorders by enhancing perceived protection efficacy.

CONCLUSION

This study enriched the theoretical framework of cultural tightness and indicated its importance in the field of mental health and health policies. It also emphasized the importance of tight culture as a protective factor against psychological disorders in case of COVID-19 outbreaks, providing valuable practical insight into psychological prevention for COVID-19 outbreaks.

摘要

背景

之前仅有的从文化视角构建有关心理反应的传染病理论模型的研究,聚焦于个体主义-集体主义的作用,而忽略了对紧密度的分析。本研究探讨了文化紧密度在 COVID-19 大流行期间与心理障碍的关系。

方法

我们招募了 1827 名中国青少年(M = 18.16 ± 2.23 岁,53.3%为女性)参与横断面调查。参与者完成了一系列问卷,包括文化紧密度量表、对 COVID-19 大流行的风险感知、感知保护效力、焦虑和抑郁。使用潜在中介调节结构方程模型分析了 COVID-19 风险感知、文化紧密度和感知保护效力对心理障碍的中介和调节作用。

结果

结果表明,对 COVID-19 的风险感知越大,心理障碍越大,但文化紧密度调节了这种正相关关系。在文化较紧的地区,随着对 COVID-19 的风险感知的增加,心理障碍的增加程度较低。此外,文化紧密度的这种调节作用进一步通过感知保护效力来介导;也就是说,通过增强感知保护效力,紧文化可以预防心理障碍。

结论

本研究丰富了文化紧密度的理论框架,并指出了其在心理健康和卫生政策领域的重要性。它还强调了在 COVID-19 爆发期间紧文化作为预防心理障碍的保护因素的重要性,为 COVID-19 爆发的心理预防提供了有价值的实际见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9fe/8607573/5277338f9df1/12889_2021_12161_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9fe/8607573/0b1f91589920/12889_2021_12161_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9fe/8607573/f2bb9adc69b1/12889_2021_12161_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9fe/8607573/32822450edaa/12889_2021_12161_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9fe/8607573/5277338f9df1/12889_2021_12161_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9fe/8607573/0b1f91589920/12889_2021_12161_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9fe/8607573/f2bb9adc69b1/12889_2021_12161_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9fe/8607573/32822450edaa/12889_2021_12161_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9fe/8607573/5277338f9df1/12889_2021_12161_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
What protects us against the COVID-19 threat? Cultural tightness matters.是什么保护我们免受 COVID-19 威胁?文化严谨性很重要。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Nov 22;21(1):2139. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12161-1.
2
Understanding cultural factors in mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: when collectivism meets a tight culture.了解新冠疫情期间心理健康中的文化因素:当集体主义遇上紧密型文化
Curr Psychol. 2022 Sep 30:1-11. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03780-x.
3
Perceived COVID-19 Threat and Reactions to Noncompliant Health-Protective Behaviors: The Mediating Role of Desired Cultural Tightness and the Moderating Role of Age.感知到的 COVID-19 威胁与对不合规健康保护行为的反应:期望的文化紧密性的中介作用和年龄的调节作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 18;19(4):2364. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042364.
4
Application of protection motivation theory and cultural tightness-looseness for predicting individuals' compliance with the government's recommended preventive measures during regular prevention and control of the COVID-19 pandemic in China.应用保护动机理论和文化紧密度-宽松度预测个体在我国 COVID-19 常态化防控期间对政府推荐预防措施的遵从性。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 24;11:1043247. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1043247. eCollection 2023.
5
The psychological impact of anxiety and depression on Chinese medical staff during the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study.新冠疫情期间焦虑和抑郁对中国医务人员的心理影响:一项横断面研究。
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Jul;10(7):7759-7774. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-1261.
6
Associations Between the Perceived Severity of the COVID-19 Pandemic, Cyberchondria, Depression, Anxiety, Stress, and Lockdown Experience: Cross-sectional Survey Study.新冠大流行严重程度感知、网络疑病症、抑郁、焦虑、压力与封控经历之间的关联:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Sep 16;7(9):e31052. doi: 10.2196/31052.
7
How do you feel during the COVID-19 pandemic? A survey using psychological and linguistic self-report measures, and machine learning to investigate mental health, subjective experience, personality, and behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic among university students.在 COVID-19 大流行期间你感觉如何?一项使用心理和语言自我报告测量以及机器学习的研究调查了 COVID-19 大流行期间大学生的心理健康、主观体验、个性和行为。
BMC Psychol. 2021 Jun 2;9(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00574-x.
8
Intolerance of COVID-19-Related Uncertainty and Negative Emotions among Chinese Adolescents: A Moderated Mediation Model of Risk Perception, Social Exclusion and Perceived Efficacy.中国青少年对新冠不确定性和负面情绪的容忍度:风险感知、社会排斥和感知效能的中介调节模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 11;18(6):2864. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18062864.
9
Risk Factors of Psychological Responses of Chinese University Students During the COVID-19 Outbreak: Cross-sectional Web-Based Survey Study.新冠疫情期间中国大学生心理反应的风险因素:基于网络的横断面调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jul 21;23(7):e29312. doi: 10.2196/29312.
10
Surviving SARS and living through COVID-19: Healthcare worker mental health outcomes and insights for coping.从 SARS 幸存和 COVID-19 中挺过来:医护人员心理健康结果及应对见解。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 10;16(11):e0258893. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258893. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Adherence to COVID-19 measures and the associated factors: evidence from a two-wave longitudinal study in Singapore.遵守 COVID-19 措施及相关因素:来自新加坡两波纵向研究的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 15;24(1):2839. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20256-8.
2
The relationship between risk perceptions and negative emotions in the COVID-19: a meta-analysis.新冠疫情中风险认知与负面情绪之间的关系:一项元分析
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 26;15:1453111. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1453111. eCollection 2024.
3
Cultural Tightness-Looseness: How Was It Related to Vaccination Behavior among University Students in Japan, the United States, and India?

本文引用的文献

1
Relationship Between Risk Perception, Social Support, and Mental Health Among General Chinese Population During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间中国普通人群的风险认知、社会支持与心理健康之间的关系
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 May 7;14:1843-1853. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S302521. eCollection 2021.
2
The relationship between cultural tightness-looseness and COVID-19 cases and deaths: a global analysis.文化紧密-宽松度与 COVID-19 病例和死亡人数之间的关系:全球分析。
Lancet Planet Health. 2021 Mar;5(3):e135-e144. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30301-6. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
3
Probable anxiety and components of psychological resilience amid COVID-19: A population-based study.
文化的严谨性与宽松性:它与日本、美国和印度大学生的疫苗接种行为有何关联?
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Dec 5;11(12):1821. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11121821.
4
Beyond the surface: accounting for confounders in understanding the link between collectivism and COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.超越表面:在理解集体主义与美国 COVID-19 大流行之间的联系时,需要考虑混杂因素。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Aug 9;23(1):1513. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16384-2.
5
Stress, Anxiety, and Depression Levels among University Students: Three Years from the Beginning of the Pandemic.大学生的压力、焦虑和抑郁水平:疫情开始三年后
Clin Pract. 2023 Apr 27;13(3):596-609. doi: 10.3390/clinpract13030054.
6
Linking Cultural Tightness, Components of Norm Activation and COVID-19 Preventive Behaviors among University Students: Evidence from Beijing, China.文化束缚、规范激活成分与大学生 COVID-19 预防行为的关系研究——来自中国北京的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 10;20(6):4905. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064905.
7
Application of protection motivation theory and cultural tightness-looseness for predicting individuals' compliance with the government's recommended preventive measures during regular prevention and control of the COVID-19 pandemic in China.应用保护动机理论和文化紧密度-宽松度预测个体在我国 COVID-19 常态化防控期间对政府推荐预防措施的遵从性。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 24;11:1043247. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1043247. eCollection 2023.
8
Individual costs and community benefits: Collectivism and individuals' compliance with public health interventions.个体成本与社区收益:集体主义与个体对公共卫生干预措施的遵从。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 3;17(11):e0275388. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275388. eCollection 2022.
9
Understanding cultural factors in mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: when collectivism meets a tight culture.了解新冠疫情期间心理健康中的文化因素:当集体主义遇上紧密型文化
Curr Psychol. 2022 Sep 30:1-11. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03780-x.
10
Perception of strong social norms during the COVID-19 pandemic is linked to positive psychological outcomes.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,对强烈社会规范的认知与积极的心理结果有关。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jul 22;22(1):1403. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13744-2.
新冠疫情期间的可能焦虑及心理弹性构成因素:一项基于人群的研究。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Mar 1;282:594-601. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.12.127. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
4
Changes in network centrality of psychopathology symptoms between the COVID-19 outbreak and after peak.新冠疫情爆发期间和高峰期过后精神病理学症状的网络中心性变化。
Mol Psychiatry. 2020 Dec;25(12):3140-3149. doi: 10.1038/s41380-020-00881-6. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
5
When altruists cannot help: the influence of altruism on the mental health of university students during the COVID-19 pandemic.利他主义者无法提供帮助时:新冠疫情期间利他主义对大学生心理健康的影响。
Global Health. 2020 Jul 10;16(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12992-020-00587-y.
6
Challenges and recommendations for mental health providers during the COVID-19 pandemic: the experience of China's First University-based mental health team.新冠肺炎疫情期间精神卫生提供者面临的挑战和建议:中国首个大学心理健康团队的经验。
Global Health. 2020 Jul 9;16(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12992-020-00591-2.
7
A nationwide survey of psychological distress among Chinese people in the COVID-19 epidemic: implications and policy recommendations.新冠疫情期间中国人心理困扰的全国性调查:启示与政策建议
Gen Psychiatr. 2020 Mar 6;33(2):e100213. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2020-100213. eCollection 2020.
8
2019-nCoV epidemic: address mental health care to empower society.2019新型冠状病毒疫情:提供精神卫生保健以增强社会力量。
Lancet. 2020 Feb 22;395(10224):e37-e38. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30309-3. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
9
The mental health of medical workers in Wuhan, China dealing with the 2019 novel coronavirus.中国武汉应对2019新型冠状病毒的医护人员的心理健康状况。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Mar;7(3):e14. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30047-X. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
10
Timely mental health care for the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak is urgently needed.2019年新型冠状病毒疫情急需及时的心理健康护理。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Mar;7(3):228-229. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30046-8. Epub 2020 Feb 4.