Suppr超能文献

影响胆管镜引导下碎石术性能的因素,包括不同的可用技术:一项 94 例患者的前瞻性多中心研究。

Factors Influencing Performance of Cholangioscopy-Guided Lithotripsy Including Available Different Technologies: A Prospective Multicenter Study with 94 Patients.

机构信息

Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Prof. Doutor Fernando Fonseca, Amadora, Portugal.

Gastroenterology Department, Hospital de Santa Luzia, Unidade Local de Saúde do Alto Minho, Viana do Castelo, Portugal.

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Aug;67(8):4195-4203. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-07305-7. Epub 2021 Nov 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Peroral cholangioscopy (POC)-guided lithotripsy is an effective treatment for difficult biliary stones. A clear definition of factors associated with the efficacy of POC-guided lithotripsy in one session and the performance of electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) and laser lithotripsy (LL) have not clearly emerged.

METHODS

This was a non-randomized prospective multicenter study of all consecutive patients who underwent POC lithotripsy (using EHL and/or LL) for difficult biliary stones. The primary endpoint of the study was the number of sessions needed to achieve complete ductal clearance and the factors associated with this outcome. Secondary endpoints included the evaluated efficacies of LL and EHL.

RESULTS

Ninety-four patients underwent 113 procedures of EHL or LL. Complete ductal clearance was obtained in 93/94 patients (98.94%). In total, 80/94 patients (85.11%) achieved stone clearance in a single session. In the multivariate analysis, stone size was independently associated with the need for multiple sessions to achieve complete ductal clearance (odds ratio = 1.146, 95% confidence interval: 1.055-1.244; p = 0.001). Using ROC curves and the Youden index, 22 mm was found to be the optimal cutoff for stone size (95% confidence interval: 15.71-28.28; p < 0.001). The majority of the patients (62.8%) underwent LL in the first session. Six patients failed the first session with EHL after using two probes and therefore were crossed over to LL, obtaining ductal clearance in a single additional session with a single LL fiber. EHL was significantly associated with a larger number of probes (2.0 vs. 1.02) to achieve ductal clearance (p < 0.01). The mean procedural time was significantly longer for EHL than for LL [72.1 (SD 16.3 min) versus 51.1 (SD 10.5 min)] (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

POC is highly effective for difficult biliary stones. Most patients achieved complete ductal clearance in one session, which was significantly more likely for stones < 22 mm. EHL was significantly associated with the need for more probes and a longer procedural time to achieve ductal clearance.

摘要

背景

经口胆镜检查(POC)引导下的碎石术是治疗困难性胆管结石的有效方法。目前还没有明确界定 POC 引导下碎石术单次治疗效果的相关因素,也没有明确电液压碎石术(EHL)和激光碎石术(LL)的性能。

方法

这是一项针对所有连续接受 POC 碎石术(使用 EHL 和/或 LL)治疗困难性胆管结石的患者的非随机前瞻性多中心研究。研究的主要终点是达到完全胆管清除所需的治疗次数,以及与该结果相关的因素。次要终点包括对 LL 和 EHL 的疗效评估。

结果

94 例患者共进行了 113 次 EHL 或 LL 操作。94 例患者(98.94%)均获得完全胆管清除。总共 80/94 例(85.11%)患者在单次治疗中即实现了结石清除。在多变量分析中,结石大小与实现完全胆管清除所需的多次治疗独立相关(比值比=1.146,95%置信区间:1.055-1.244;p=0.001)。使用 ROC 曲线和 Youden 指数,发现 22 毫米是结石大小的最佳截断值(95%置信区间:15.71-28.28;p<0.001)。大多数患者(62.8%)在首次治疗中即接受了 LL。6 例患者在使用 2 根探针后首次 EHL 治疗失败,随后改用 LL,在单次额外的 LL 纤维治疗中实现了胆管清除。EHL 与实现胆管清除所需的探针数量(2.0 比 1.02)显著相关(p<0.01)。EHL 的手术时间明显长于 LL[72.1(SD 16.3 分钟)比 51.1(SD 10.5 分钟)](p<0.01)。

结论

POC 治疗困难性胆管结石非常有效。大多数患者在单次治疗中即实现了完全胆管清除,结石<22 毫米的患者更有可能实现这一目标。EHL 与实现胆管清除所需的更多探针和更长的手术时间显著相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验