Suppr超能文献

数字单操作胆道镜治疗复杂胆道结石的疗效和安全性。

Efficacy and Safety of Digital Single-Operator Cholangioscopy for Difficult Biliary Stones.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland.

GI-Services, Pancreatobiliary Medicine Unit, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jun;16(6):918-926.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.10.017. Epub 2017 Oct 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: It is not clear whether digital single-operator cholangioscopy (D-SOC) with electrohydraulic and laser lithotripsy is effective in removal of difficult biliary stones. We investigated the safety and efficacy of D-SOC with electrohydraulic and laser lithotripsy in an international, multicenter study of patients with difficult biliary stones.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 407 patients (60.4% female; mean age, 64.2 years) who underwent D-SOC for difficult biliary stones at 22 tertiary centers in the United States, United Kingdom, or Korea from February 2015 through December 2016; 306 patients underwent electrohydraulic lithotripsy and 101 (24.8%) underwent laser lithotripsy. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify factors associated with technical failure and the need for more than 1 D-SOC electrohydraulic or laser lithotripsy session to clear the bile duct.

RESULTS

The mean procedure time was longer in the electrohydraulic lithotripsy group (73.9 minutes) than in the laser lithotripsy group (49.9 minutes; P < .001). Ducts were completely cleared (technical success) in 97.3% of patients (96.7% of patients with electrohydraulic lithotripsy vs 99% patients with laser lithotripsy; P = .31). Ducts were cleared in a single session in 77.4% of patients (74.5% by electrohydraulic lithotripsy and 86.1% by laser lithotripsy; P = .20). Electrohydraulic or laser lithotripsy failed in 11 patients (2.7%); 8 patients were treated by surgery. Adverse events occurred in 3.7% patients and the stone was incompletely removed from 6.6% of patients. On multivariable analysis, difficult anatomy or cannulation (duodenal diverticula or altered anatomy) correlated with technical failure (odds ratio, 5.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-21.2; P = .02). Procedure time increased odds of more than 1 session of D-SOC electrohydraulic or laser lithotripsy (odds ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.03; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In a multicenter, international, retrospective analysis, we found D-SOC with electrohydraulic or laser lithotripsy to be effective and safe in more than 95% of patients with difficult biliary stones. Fewer than 5% of patients require additional treatment with surgery and/or extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy to clear the duct.

摘要

背景与目的

目前尚不清楚数字单操作胆管镜(D-SOC)联合液电和激光碎石术是否能有效清除复杂的胆管结石。我们通过一项在美国、英国和韩国的 22 家三级中心进行的国际多中心研究,调查了 D-SOC 联合液电和激光碎石术治疗复杂胆管结石的安全性和有效性。

方法

我们对 2015 年 2 月至 2016 年 12 月期间因复杂胆管结石接受 D-SOC 治疗的 407 例患者(60.4%为女性;平均年龄 64.2 岁)进行了回顾性分析;其中 306 例行液电碎石术,101 例行激光碎石术(24.8%)。我们进行了单因素和多因素分析,以确定与技术失败相关的因素,以及需要超过 1 次 D-SOC 液电或激光碎石术才能清除胆管的因素。

结果

液电碎石组的手术时间(73.9 分钟)长于激光碎石组(49.9 分钟;P<0.001)。97.3%的患者(96.7%行液电碎石术,99%行激光碎石术;P=0.31)胆管完全清除(技术成功)。77.4%的患者在单次治疗中胆管被清除(45.5%行液电碎石术,86.1%行激光碎石术;P=0.20)。11 例(2.7%)患者出现碎石失败,8 例患者接受手术治疗。3.7%的患者出现不良事件,6.6%的患者结石未完全清除。多因素分析显示,复杂的解剖结构或插管(十二指肠憩室或解剖结构改变)与技术失败相关(比值比,5.18;95%置信区间,1.26-21.2;P=0.02)。手术时间的增加会增加 D-SOC 液电或激光碎石术需要 1 次以上治疗的可能性(比值比,1.02;95%置信区间,1.01-1.03;P<0.001)。

结论

在这项多中心、国际、回顾性分析中,我们发现 D-SOC 联合液电或激光碎石术治疗复杂胆管结石的有效率和安全性超过 95%。不到 5%的患者需要额外的手术和/或体外冲击波碎石术来清除胆管。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验