Suppr超能文献

数字单操作孔视频胆道镜治疗难治性胆管结石:多中心观察性研究。

Digital single-operator video cholangioscopy in treating refractory biliary stones: a multicenter observational study.

机构信息

Department of Medicine B for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.

Department of Internal Medicine, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Duesseldorf, Kirchfeldstrasse 40, 40217, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2020 May;34(5):1914-1922. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06962-0. Epub 2019 Jul 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Standard endoscopic treatment might fail to treat biliary stone disease. Here, we investigated the efficacy and safety of recently introduced digital single-operator video cholangioscopy (SOVC) for the treatment of difficult biliary stones.

METHODS

Digital SOVC procedures, performed in two tertiary referral centers between 2015 and 2018, were retrospectively analyzed. Only patients with a previous failure of endoscopic standard treatment and a SOVC-based biliary stone treatment using electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) or laser lithotripsy (LL) were included. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the stone removal rate per procedure and per patient.

RESULTS

In total, 75 examinations with a digital SOVC-assisted biliary stone treatment, performed in 60 patients, were identified. Biliary stones were mainly located extrahepatic (64%) and less frequently intrahepatic (36%). The median stone size was 20 mm (interquartile range [IQR]: 10-25 mm) and the median stone number was 1 (IQR: 1-2). Digital SOVC-based treatment of biliary stone disease was successful in 95% of patients and 15% needed at least two treatment sessions. Evaluated per procedure, a complete stone removal was accomplished in 67% of all examinations (including initial and repeated procedures), while an incomplete stone removal was observed in 33% of cases. The per procedure analyzes revealed that the success rates for a complete stone removal were similar between LL and EHL (66% vs. 68%; p = 0.87). Complications, such as postinterventional cholangitis and pancreatitis occurred in 16% of examinations; however, except from one case, all were mild or moderate and no procedure-associated mortality occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Digital SOVC-assisted biliary stone treatment is highly effective even in cases with difficult biliary stones and might be considered the new standard of care for these patients. Furthermore, mild up to moderate complications were intermittently observed which might document the complexity of our included cases.

摘要

背景

标准的内镜治疗可能无法治疗胆管结石病。在这里,我们研究了最近引入的数字单操作器视频胆管镜(SOVC)治疗困难性胆管结石的疗效和安全性。

方法

回顾性分析了 2015 年至 2018 年间在两个三级转诊中心进行的数字 SOVC 操作。仅纳入先前内镜标准治疗失败且基于 SOVC 采用液电碎石术(EHL)或激光碎石术(LL)进行胆道结石治疗的患者。主要终点是评估每例和每位患者的结石清除率。

结果

共确定了 60 例患者 75 次数字 SOVC 辅助胆道结石治疗的检查。胆管结石主要位于肝外(64%),较少位于肝内(36%)。中位结石大小为 20mm(四分位间距[IQR]:10-25mm),中位结石数量为 1(IQR:1-2)。数字 SOVC 辅助胆道结石治疗在 95%的患者中取得成功,15%的患者需要至少两次治疗。每例评估显示,所有检查中有 67%(包括初始和重复治疗)完全清除了结石,而 33%的病例则不完全清除了结石。每例治疗的分析显示,LL 和 EHL 的完全结石清除率相似(66% vs. 68%;p=0.87)。术后出现胆管炎和胰腺炎等并发症的检查占 16%;然而,除 1 例外,所有并发症均为轻度或中度,无与治疗相关的死亡。

结论

即使在处理困难性胆管结石时,数字 SOVC 辅助胆道结石治疗也非常有效,可作为这些患者的新治疗标准。此外,间歇性观察到轻度至中度并发症,这可能表明我们纳入的病例较为复杂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验