From the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Nippon Medical School.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Jan 1;149(1):79e-94e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008667.
In 2010, this Journal published my comprehensive review of the literature on hypertrophic scars and keloids. In that article, I presented evidence-based algorithms for the prevention and treatment of these refractory pathologic scars. In the ensuing decade, substantial progress has been made in the field, including many new randomized controlled trials. To reflect this, I have updated my review.
All studies were evaluated for methodologic quality. Baseline characteristics of patients were extracted along with the interventions and their outcomes. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and comprehensive reviews were included if available.
Risk factors that promote hypertrophic scar and keloid growth include local factors (tension on the wound/scar), systemic factors (e.g., hypertension), genetic factors (e.g., single-nucleotide polymorphisms), and lifestyle factors. Treatment of hypertrophic scars depends on scar contracture severity: if severe, surgery is the first choice. If not, conservative therapies are indicated. Keloid treatment depends on whether they are small and single or large and multiple. Small and single keloids can be treated radically by surgery with adjuvant therapy (e.g., radiotherapy) or multimodal conservative therapy. For large and multiple keloids, volume- and number-reducing surgery is a choice. Regardless of the treatment(s), patients should be followed up over the long term. Conservative therapies, including gel sheets, tape fixation, topical and injected external agents, oral agents, and makeup therapy, should be administered on a case-by-case basis.
Randomized controlled trials on pathologic scar management have increased markedly over the past decade. Although these studies suffer from various limitations, they have greatly improved hypertrophic scar and keloid management. Future high-quality trials are likely to improve the current hypertrophic scar and keloid treatment algorithms further.
2010 年,本刊发表了我对增生性瘢痕和瘢痕疙瘩文献的全面综述。在那篇文章中,我提出了预防和治疗这些难治性病理性瘢痕的循证算法。在随后的十年中,该领域取得了重大进展,包括许多新的随机对照试验。为了反映这一点,我更新了我的综述。
所有研究均进行了方法学质量评估。提取患者的基线特征,包括干预措施及其结果。如果有系统评价、荟萃分析和综合评价,也将包括在内。
促进增生性瘢痕和瘢痕疙瘩生长的危险因素包括局部因素(伤口/瘢痕张力)、全身因素(如高血压)、遗传因素(如单核苷酸多态性)和生活方式因素。增生性瘢痕的治疗取决于瘢痕挛缩的严重程度:如果严重,手术是首选。如果不严重,则采用保守治疗。瘢痕疙瘩的治疗取决于其是小而单一还是大而多个。小而单一的瘢痕疙瘩可以通过手术联合辅助治疗(如放疗)或多模态保守治疗进行根治性治疗。对于大而多个的瘢痕疙瘩,可选择容积和数量减少的手术。无论采用何种治疗方法,患者都应长期随访。应根据具体情况给予包括凝胶片、胶带固定、局部和注射外用制剂、口服药物和化妆疗法在内的保守治疗。
过去十年中,病理性瘢痕管理的随机对照试验显著增加。尽管这些研究存在各种局限性,但它们极大地改善了增生性瘢痕和瘢痕疙瘩的管理。未来高质量的试验可能会进一步改进现有的增生性瘢痕和瘢痕疙瘩治疗算法。