• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

展示农村社区心理健康康复服务的过程和结果:一个现实主义的评估。

Demonstrating the processes and outcomes of a rural Community Mental Health Rehabilitation Service: A realist evaluation.

机构信息

Barossa Hills Fleurieu Local Health Network/ Rural and Remote Mental Health Service, Angaston, Australia.

Flinders and Upper North Local Health Network/ Whyalla Integrated Mental Health Service, Whyalla, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Nov 23;16(11):e0260250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260250. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0260250
PMID:34813607
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8610260/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

As part of significant mental health reform, the Community Mental Health Rehabilitation Service (CMHRS) was implemented in rural South Australia. The CMHRS is a 10-bed mental health residential program offering rehabilitative mental health support to rural residents.

AIM

To analyse the CMHRS service delivery model and its impact on recovery outcomes for consumers.

METHODS

A mixed method, realist evaluation approach was utilised. A purposive sample of CMHRS staff (n = 6) and consumers (n = 8) were recruited. Consumer recovery was measured using the RAS-DS (on admission and discharge). Participants' perspectives of the service were gained via one staff focus group (n = 6) and individual semi-structured interviews (consumers n = 6; staff n = 2). Pre-post RAS-DS scores were analysed using paired t-tests/Wilcoxon paired-signed rank test, with qualitative data analysed thematically.

RESULTS

Significant positive increases in RAS-DS total scores were observed at discharge, supported by the qualitative themes of (re)building relationships and social connections and recovering health and wellbeing. Contextual factors (e.g. staffing) and program mechanisms (e.g. scheduling) impacting on service implementation were identified.

CONCLUSION

Maintaining a rehabilitation recovery-focused approach, balanced with an appropriately trained multi-disciplinary team, are vital for maximising positive consumer outcomes.

SIGNIFICANCE

This realist evaluation identifies critical factors impacting rural mental health rehabilitation service delivery.

摘要

背景

作为重大心理健康改革的一部分,社区心理健康康复服务(CMHRS)在南澳大利亚农村地区实施。CMHRS 是一个 10 张床位的精神健康住院康复计划,为农村居民提供康复精神健康支持。

目的

分析 CMHRS 的服务交付模式及其对消费者康复结果的影响。

方法

采用混合方法、现实主义评估方法。招募了 CMHRS 工作人员(n=6)和消费者(n=8)的目的抽样。使用 RAS-DS(入院和出院时)衡量消费者的康复情况。通过一个工作人员焦点小组(n=6)和个别半结构化访谈(消费者 n=6;工作人员 n=2)获得参与者对服务的看法。使用配对 t 检验/Wilcoxon 配对符号秩检验分析 RAS-DS 前后得分,对定性数据进行主题分析。

结果

出院时 RAS-DS 总分显著增加,得到定性主题(重建)关系和社会联系以及恢复健康和幸福感的支持。确定了影响服务实施的背景因素(如人员配置)和计划机制(如日程安排)。

结论

保持以康复为重点的方法,并辅以适当训练的多学科团队,对于最大限度地提高消费者的积极成果至关重要。

意义

这项现实评估确定了影响农村心理健康康复服务交付的关键因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f5b/8610260/c8ac9643206a/pone.0260250.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f5b/8610260/60bdb35ca9b4/pone.0260250.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f5b/8610260/c8ac9643206a/pone.0260250.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f5b/8610260/60bdb35ca9b4/pone.0260250.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f5b/8610260/c8ac9643206a/pone.0260250.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Demonstrating the processes and outcomes of a rural Community Mental Health Rehabilitation Service: A realist evaluation.展示农村社区心理健康康复服务的过程和结果:一个现实主义的评估。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 23;16(11):e0260250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260250. eCollection 2021.
2
The Station Community Mental Health Centre Inc: nurturing and empowering.车站社区心理健康中心有限公司:关怀与赋能。
Rural Remote Health. 2010 Jul-Sep;10(3):1411. Epub 2010 Aug 9.
3
Applying Strengths Model principles to build a rural community-based mental health support service and achieve recovery outcomes.应用优势模型原则建立基于农村社区的心理健康支持服务并实现康复成果。
Rural Remote Health. 2018 Feb;18(1):3708. doi: 10.22605/RRH3708. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
4
Face to face, person to person: Skills and attributes deployed by rural mental health clinicians when engaging with consumers.面对面,人与人:农村心理健康临床医生在与服务对象接触时所运用的技能和特质。
Aust J Rural Health. 2015 Dec;23(6):352-8. doi: 10.1111/ajr.12204.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
Longitudinal comparative evaluation of the equivalence of an integrated peer-support and clinical staffing model for residential mental health rehabilitation: a mixed methods protocol incorporating multiple stakeholder perspectives.住院精神卫生康复综合同伴支持与临床人员配备模式等效性的纵向比较评估:一项纳入多利益相关方观点的混合方法方案
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Jun 2;16:179. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0882-x.
7
Explanation of context, mechanisms and outcomes in adult community mental health crisis care: the MH-CREST realist evidence synthesis.成人社区心理健康危机护理中的背景、机制和结果解释:MH-CREST 真实证据综合研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Sep;11(15):1-161. doi: 10.3310/TWKK5110.
8
Balancing hospital and community treatment: effectiveness of an extended-hours community mental health team in a semi-rural region of australia.平衡医院与社区治疗:澳大利亚半农村地区延长工作时间的社区心理健康团队的成效
Aust J Rural Health. 2003 Aug;11(4):181-6.
9
Consumers' understanding and expectations of a community-based recovery-oriented mental health rehabilitation unit: a pragmatic grounded theory analysis.消费者对基于社区的以康复为导向的精神卫生康复单位的理解和期望:实用扎根理论分析。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 Aug;28(4):408-417. doi: 10.1017/S2045796017000749. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
10
Understanding consumers' initial expectations of community-based residential mental health rehabilitation in the context of past experiences of care: A mixed-methods pragmatic grounded theory analysis.理解消费者在过去护理经历背景下对社区居住型精神健康康复的初始期望:混合方法实用扎根理论分析。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Dec;27(6):1650-1660. doi: 10.1111/inm.12461. Epub 2018 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Communication practices with patients using a language other than French: a cross-sectional survey in a university hospital in France.在法国一家大学医院中针对使用法语以外语言与患者沟通的实践情况开展的横断面调查。
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Mar 24;24(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02422-5.
2
How does mentoring occupational therapists improve intervention fidelity in a randomised controlled trial? A realist evaluation.导师制如何提高职业治疗师在随机对照试验中的干预一致性?一项现实主义评价。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Jul 1;24(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02269-4.

本文引用的文献

1
The Whole-of-Person Retention Improvement Framework: A Guide for Addressing Health Workforce Challenges in the Rural Context.全人保留改进框架:解决农村卫生人力挑战的指南。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 14;17(8):2698. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082698.
2
The Orange Declaration on rural and remote mental health.《关于农村和偏远地区心理健康的橙色宣言》
Aust J Rural Health. 2019 Oct;27(5):374-379. doi: 10.1111/ajr.12560. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
3
An overview of realist evaluation for simulation-based education.基于模拟的教育的现实主义评价概述。
Adv Simul (Lond). 2018 Jul 17;3:13. doi: 10.1186/s41077-018-0073-6. eCollection 2018.
4
The Recovery Assessment Scale - Domains and Stages (RAS-DS): Sensitivity to change over time and convergent validity with level of unmet need.恢复评估量表 - 领域和阶段(RAS-DS):随时间变化的敏感性和与未满足需求水平的收敛有效性。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Mar;261:560-564. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.01.042.
5
Mental health services conceptualised as complex adaptive systems: what can be learned?被概念化为复杂适应系统的心理健康服务:能学到什么?
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2017 Jun 29;11:43. doi: 10.1186/s13033-017-0150-6. eCollection 2017.
6
A review of social participation interventions for people with mental health problems.针对有心理健康问题者的社会参与干预措施综述。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017 Apr;52(4):369-380. doi: 10.1007/s00127-017-1372-2. Epub 2017 Mar 12.
7
Recovery Assessment Scale - Domains and Stages (RAS-DS): Its feasibility and outcome measurement capacity.康复评估量表 - 领域与阶段(RAS-DS):其可行性及结果测量能力。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2015 Jul;49(7):624-33. doi: 10.1177/0004867414564084. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
8
Multidisciplinary team care in rehabilitation: an overview of reviews.康复中的多学科团队护理:综述概述。
J Rehabil Med. 2012 Nov;44(11):901-12. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1040.