University of New South Wales.
Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2022 Jan 5;34(2):290-312. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01796.
Attention can be deployed in different ways: When searching for a taxi in New York City, we can decide where to attend (e.g., to the street) and what to attend to (e.g., yellow cars). Although we use the same word to describe both processes, nonhuman primate data suggest that these produce distinct effects on neural tuning. This has been challenging to assess in humans, but here we used an opportunity afforded by multivariate decoding of MEG data. We found that attending to an object at a particular location and attending to a particular object feature produced effects that interacted multiplicatively. The two types of attention induced distinct patterns of enhancement in occipital cortex, with feature-selective attention producing relatively more enhancement of small feature differences and spatial attention producing relatively larger effects for larger feature differences. An information flow analysis further showed that stimulus representations in occipital cortex were Granger-caused by coding in frontal cortices earlier in time and that the timing of this feedback matched the onset of attention effects. The data suggest that spatial and feature-selective attention rely on distinct neural mechanisms that arise from frontal-occipital information exchange, interacting multiplicatively to selectively enhance task-relevant information.
当在纽约市寻找出租车时,我们可以决定将注意力集中在何处(例如,集中在街道上)以及集中在什么上(例如,集中在黄色汽车上)。尽管我们使用相同的词来描述这两个过程,但非人类灵长类动物的数据表明,这些过程会对神经调谐产生不同的影响。这在人类中很难评估,但在这里,我们利用了从 MEG 数据进行多元解码提供的机会。我们发现,将注意力集中在特定位置的物体上和将注意力集中在特定的物体特征上,会产生相互作用的效果。这两种类型的注意力在枕叶皮层中引起了不同的增强模式,特征选择性注意力产生了相对较小特征差异的更大增强,而空间注意力则对较大的特征差异产生了相对更大的影响。信息流分析进一步表明,枕叶皮层中的刺激表示被来自额叶皮层的编码在时间上更早地格兰杰因果关系,并且这种反馈的时间与注意力效果的开始相匹配。数据表明,空间注意力和特征选择性注意力依赖于不同的神经机制,这些机制源于额-枕叶信息交换,以相互作用的方式选择性地增强任务相关信息。