• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于树的方法,使用结构化和非结构化数据对手术过程进行多类分类。

A tree based approach for multi-class classification of surgical procedures using structured and unstructured data.

机构信息

Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.

Department of Computer Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Nov 23;21(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01665-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-021-01665-w
PMID:34814905
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8612004/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In surgical department, CPT code assignment has been a complicated manual human effort, that entails significant related knowledge and experience. While there are several studies using CPTs to make predictions in surgical services, literature on predicting CPTs in surgical and other services using text features is very sparse. This study improves the prediction of CPTs by the means of informative features and a novel re-prioritization algorithm.

METHODS

The input data used in this study is composed of both structured and unstructured data. The ground truth labels (CPTs) are obtained from medical coding databases using relative value units which indicates the major operational procedures in each surgery case. In the modeling process, we first utilize Random Forest multi-class classification model to predict the CPT codes. Second, we extract the key information such as label probabilities, feature importance measures, and medical term frequency. Then, the indicated factors are used in a novel algorithm to rearrange the alternative CPT codes in the list of potential candidates based on the calculated weights.

RESULTS

To evaluate the performance of both phases, prediction and complementary improvement, we report the accuracy scores of multi-class CPT prediction tasks for datasets of 5 key surgery case specialities. The Random Forest model performs the classification task with 74-76% when predicting the primary CPT (accuracy@1) versus the CPT set (accuracy@2) with respect to two filtering conditions on CPT codes. The complementary algorithm improves the results from initial step by 8% on average. Furthermore, the incorporated text features enhanced the quality of the output by 20-35%. The model outperforms the state-of-the-art neural network model with respect to accuracy, precision and recall.

CONCLUSIONS

We have established a robust framework based on a decision tree predictive model. We predict the surgical codes more accurately and robust compared to the state-of-the-art deep neural structures which can help immensely in both surgery billing and scheduling purposes in such units.

摘要

背景

在外科部门,CPT 代码分配是一项复杂的手动工作,需要具备相关的知识和经验。虽然有几项研究使用 CPT 来进行手术服务的预测,但关于使用文本特征预测手术和其他服务中的 CPT 的文献却很少。本研究通过提供信息特征和一种新颖的重新排序算法来改进 CPT 的预测。

方法

本研究使用的输入数据包括结构化和非结构化数据。地面真实标签(CPT)是通过使用相对价值单位从医疗编码数据库中获得的,相对价值单位表示每个手术病例中的主要手术程序。在建模过程中,我们首先利用随机森林多类分类模型来预测 CPT 代码。其次,我们提取关键信息,如标签概率、特征重要性度量和医疗术语频率。然后,在所指示的因素的基础上,使用一种新颖的算法根据计算出的权重重新排列潜在候选者列表中的替代 CPT 代码。

结果

为了评估预测和补充改进两个阶段的性能,我们报告了 5 种主要手术病例专科数据集的多类 CPT 预测任务的准确率分数。随机森林模型在预测主要 CPT(准确率@1)相对于 CPT 集(准确率@2)时执行分类任务,准确率为 74-76%,同时对 CPT 代码进行了两种过滤条件。互补算法平均提高了初始步骤的结果 8%。此外,纳入的文本特征提高了输出质量 20-35%。该模型在准确性、精度和召回率方面优于最先进的神经网络模型。

结论

我们已经建立了一个基于决策树预测模型的强大框架。与最先进的深度神经网络结构相比,我们更准确和稳健地预测了手术代码,这对这些单位的手术计费和调度目的非常有帮助。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4343/8612004/b708dcc71786/12911_2021_1665_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4343/8612004/4b26eab789b8/12911_2021_1665_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4343/8612004/5c7a5a58e55f/12911_2021_1665_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4343/8612004/41014efe31ab/12911_2021_1665_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4343/8612004/8c6c8f42a42b/12911_2021_1665_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4343/8612004/b31c55829c69/12911_2021_1665_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4343/8612004/b708dcc71786/12911_2021_1665_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4343/8612004/4b26eab789b8/12911_2021_1665_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4343/8612004/5c7a5a58e55f/12911_2021_1665_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4343/8612004/41014efe31ab/12911_2021_1665_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4343/8612004/8c6c8f42a42b/12911_2021_1665_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4343/8612004/b31c55829c69/12911_2021_1665_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4343/8612004/b708dcc71786/12911_2021_1665_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A tree based approach for multi-class classification of surgical procedures using structured and unstructured data.基于树的方法,使用结构化和非结构化数据对手术过程进行多类分类。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Nov 23;21(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01665-w.
2
Evaluating Coding Accuracy in General Surgery Residents' Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Procedural Case Logs.评估普通外科住院医师毕业后医学教育认证委员会程序病例日志中的编码准确性。
J Surg Educ. 2016 Nov-Dec;73(6):e59-e63. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.07.017.
3
Neural Machine Translation-Based Automated Current Procedural Terminology Classification System Using Procedure Text: Development and Validation Study.基于神经机器翻译的使用手术文本的自动当前手术操作术语分类系统:开发与验证研究
JMIR Form Res. 2021 May 26;5(5):e22461. doi: 10.2196/22461.
4
Comparison of Machine-Learning Algorithms for the Prediction of Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) Codes from Pathology Reports.用于从病理报告预测当前操作术语(CPT)代码的机器学习算法比较
J Pathol Inform. 2022 Jan 5;13:3. doi: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_52_21. eCollection 2022.
5
Classification of Current Procedural Terminology Codes from Electronic Health Record Data Using Machine Learning.使用机器学习对电子健康记录数据中的当前操作术语代码进行分类。
Anesthesiology. 2020 Apr;132(4):738-749. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003150.
6
Can Natural Language Processing and Artificial Intelligence Automate The Generation of Billing Codes From Operative Note Dictations?自然语言处理和人工智能能否根据手术记录口述自动生成计费代码?
Global Spine J. 2023 Sep;13(7):1946-1955. doi: 10.1177/21925682211062831. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
7
Construction and Utilization of a Neural Network Model to Predict Current Procedural Terminology Codes from Pathology Report Texts.用于从病理报告文本预测当前操作术语代码的神经网络模型的构建与应用
J Pathol Inform. 2019 Apr 3;10:13. doi: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_3_19. eCollection 2019.
8
Utility of a combined current procedural terminology and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code algorithm in classifying cervical spine surgery for degenerative changes.联合现行操作术语和国际疾病分类,第九修订版,临床修正码算法在分类退行性改变的颈椎手术中的应用。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 15;36(22):1843-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f7a943.
9
CPT to RVU conversion improves model performance in the prediction of surgical case length.CPT 到 RVU 的转换可提高手术病例长度预测模型的性能。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 8;11(1):14169. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93573-2.
10
Explainable automated coding of clinical notes using hierarchical label-wise attention networks and label embedding initialisation.使用分层标签分类注意力网络和标签嵌入初始化来实现临床笔记的可解释自动化编码。
J Biomed Inform. 2021 Apr;116:103728. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103728. Epub 2021 Mar 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Machine-Learning Algorithms for the Prediction of Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) Codes from Pathology Reports.用于从病理报告预测当前操作术语(CPT)代码的机器学习算法比较
J Pathol Inform. 2022 Jan 5;13:3. doi: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_52_21. eCollection 2022.
2
Automated Surgical Term Clustering: A Text Mining Approach for Unstructured Textual Surgery Descriptions.自动手术术语聚类:一种用于非结构化手术描述的文本挖掘方法。
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2020 Jul;24(7):2107-2118. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2019.2956973. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
3
Construction and Utilization of a Neural Network Model to Predict Current Procedural Terminology Codes from Pathology Report Texts.
用于从病理报告文本预测当前操作术语代码的神经网络模型的构建与应用
J Pathol Inform. 2019 Apr 3;10:13. doi: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_3_19. eCollection 2019.
4
In setting doctors' Medicare fees, CMS almost always accepts the relative value update panel's advice on work values.在设定医生的医疗保险费用时,CMS 几乎总是接受相对价值更新小组关于工作价值的建议。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 May;31(5):965-72. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0557.
5
Modeling procedure and surgical times for current procedural terminology-anesthesia-surgeon combinations and evaluation in terms of case-duration prediction and operating room efficiency: a multicenter study.当前程序术语-麻醉-外科医生组合的建模程序和手术时间以及在病例持续时间预测和手术室效率方面的评估:一项多中心研究
Anesth Analg. 2009 Oct;109(4):1232-45. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181b5de07.
6
Surgeon and type of anesthesia predict variability in surgical procedure times.外科医生和麻醉类型可预测手术时间的变异性。
Anesthesiology. 2000 May;92(5):1454-66. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200005000-00036.