Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York City, New York, USA.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 May;31(5):965-72. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0557.
To calculate physicians' fees under Medicare--which in turn influence the physician fee schedules of other public and private payers--one of the essential decisions the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) must make is how much physician time and effort, or work, is associated with various physician services. To make this determination, CMS relies on the recommendations of an advisory committee representing national physician organizations. Some experts on primary care who are concerned about the income gap between primary and specialty care providers have blamed the committee for increasing that gap. Our analysis of CMS's decisions on updating work values between 1994 and 2010 found that CMS agreed with 87.4 percent of the committee's recommendations, although CMS reduced recommended work values for a limited number of radiology and medical specialty services. If policy makers or physicians want to change the update process but keep the Medicare fee schedule in its current form, CMS's capacity to review changes in relative value units could be strengthened through long-term investment in the agency's ability to undertake research and analysis of issues such as how the effort and time associated with different physician services is determined, and which specialties--if any--receive higher payments than others as a result.
为了计算医疗保险下的医生薪酬——这反过来又影响了其他公共和私人支付者的医生薪酬表——医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心 (CMS) 必须做出的一个基本决策是,与各种医生服务相关的医生时间和精力或工作量是多少。为了做出这一决定,CMS 依赖于一个代表全国医生组织的咨询委员会的建议。一些关注初级保健和专科医疗服务提供者之间收入差距的初级保健专家指责该委员会造成了这种差距。我们对 CMS 关于 1994 年至 2010 年更新工作价值的决策进行的分析发现,CMS 同意委员会 87.4%的建议,尽管 CMS 减少了放射学和一些医学专业服务的建议工作价值。如果政策制定者或医生想要改变更新过程,但保留当前形式的医疗保险费用表,CMS 可以通过对机构进行长期投资,增强其审查相对价值单位变化的能力,以便能够对与不同医生服务相关的努力和时间的确定方式等问题进行研究和分析,并确定哪些专业(如果有的话)因此获得比其他专业更高的报酬。