• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为什么在具有全民医保覆盖的经合组织国家中,医疗保健的利用情况在社会经济群体之间存在差异?一项系统评价的方案。

Why does healthcare utilisation differ between socioeconomic groups in OECD countries with universal healthcare coverage? A protocol for a systematic review.

机构信息

Centre for Health and Society, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands

Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 23;11(11):e054806. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054806.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054806
PMID:34815290
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8611423/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Even in advanced economies with universal healthcare coverage (UHC), a social gradient in healthcare utilisation has been reported. Many individual, community and healthcare system factors have been considered that may be associated with the variation in healthcare utilisation between socioeconomic groups. Nevertheless, relatively little is known about the complex interaction and relative contribution of these factors to socioeconomic differences in healthcare utilisation. In order to improve understanding of why utilisation patterns differ by socioeconomic status (SES), the proposed systematic review will explore the main mechanisms that have been examined in quantitative research.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The systematic review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines and will be conducted in Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Econlit and PsycInfo. Articles examining factors associated with the differences in primary and specialised healthcare utilisation between socioeconomic groups in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries with UHC will be included. Further restrictions concern specifications of outcome measures, factors of interest, study design, population, language and type of publication. Data will be numerically summarised, narratively synthesised and thematically discussed. The factors will be categorised according to existing frameworks for barriers to healthcare access.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

No primary data will be collected. No ethics approval is required. We intend to publish a scientific article in an international peer-reviewed journal.

摘要

简介

即使在具有全民医保覆盖(UHC)的发达经济体中,也有报道称医疗保健的利用存在社会梯度。已经考虑了许多个人、社区和医疗系统因素,这些因素可能与社会经济群体之间医疗保健利用的差异有关。然而,对于这些因素之间复杂的相互作用及其对医疗保健利用的社会经济差异的相对贡献,人们知之甚少。为了更好地理解为什么利用模式会因社会经济地位(SES)而异,拟议的系统评价将探讨在定量研究中已经检查过的主要机制。

方法和分析

系统评价将遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南,并将在 Embase、PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、Econlit 和 PsycInfo 中进行。将包括检查经合组织(OECD)国家全民医保覆盖下社会经济群体之间初级和专科医疗保健利用差异相关因素的文章。进一步的限制涉及结果衡量标准、感兴趣因素、研究设计、人口、语言和出版物类型的具体规定。数据将以数字方式汇总、叙述性综合和主题性讨论。这些因素将根据现有的医疗保健获取障碍框架进行分类。

伦理和传播

不会收集原始数据。不需要伦理批准。我们打算在国际同行评议期刊上发表一篇科学文章。

相似文献

1
Why does healthcare utilisation differ between socioeconomic groups in OECD countries with universal healthcare coverage? A protocol for a systematic review.为什么在具有全民医保覆盖的经合组织国家中,医疗保健的利用情况在社会经济群体之间存在差异?一项系统评价的方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 23;11(11):e054806. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054806.
2
Systematic review of individual-level, community-level, and healthcare system-level factors contributing to socioeconomic differences in healthcare utilisation in OECD countries with universal health coverage.对经合组织国家中具有全民健康覆盖的国家的个人层面、社区层面和医疗保健系统层面的因素对医疗保健利用的社会经济差异的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 18;14(3):e080559. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080559.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Correlation of mesolevel characteristics of the healthcare system and socioeconomic inequality in healthcare use: a scoping review protocol.卫生保健系统中观特征与卫生保健利用的社会经济不平等之间的相关性:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 5;11(2):e044301. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044301.
5
Sharps injuries and splash exposures among healthcare workers in Arab countries: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis.阿拉伯国家医护人员的锐器伤和喷溅暴露:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 7;11(10):e052993. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052993.
6
Identifying indicators sensitive to primary healthcare nurse practitioner practice: a review of systematic reviews protocol.识别对初级保健执业护士实践敏感的指标:系统评价方案综述
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 6;11(1):e043213. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043213.
7
Protocol for a scoping review of implementation research approaches to universal health coverage in Africa.非洲全民健康覆盖实施研究方法的范围审查方案
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 15;11(2):e041721. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041721.
8
Health seeking behaviours and private sector delivery of care for non-communicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: protocol for a systematic review.中低收入国家非传染性疾病的寻医行为和私营部门医疗服务提供情况:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 24;13(8):e066213. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066213.
9
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
10
Private sector delivery of quality care for maternal, newborn and child health in low-income and middle-income countries: a mixed-methods systematic review protocol.私营部门在中低收入国家提供优质孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康护理服务:一项混合方法系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 17;10(2):e033141. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033141.

引用本文的文献

1
Experiences in healthcare for weight management - a qualitative interview study of retired individuals with obesity and low or high education.体重管理方面的医疗保健经验——一项针对肥胖且受教育程度较低或较高的退休个体的定性访谈研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 26;24(1):1285. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11777-4.
2
Systematic review of individual-level, community-level, and healthcare system-level factors contributing to socioeconomic differences in healthcare utilisation in OECD countries with universal health coverage.对经合组织国家中具有全民健康覆盖的国家的个人层面、社区层面和医疗保健系统层面的因素对医疗保健利用的社会经济差异的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 18;14(3):e080559. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080559.
3
Socioeconomic status and healthcare utilization disparities among children with epilepsy in the United States: Results from a nationally representative sample.美国癫痫患儿的社会经济地位与医疗保健利用差距:来自全国代表性样本的结果。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 8;13(1):21776. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48668-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Socioeconomic differences in healthcare expenditure and utilization in The Netherlands.荷兰医疗支出和利用的社会经济差异。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 3;21(1):643. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06694-9.
2
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
3
Socioeconomic inequalities in primary-care and specialist physician visits: a systematic review.社会经济不平等与初级保健和专科医生就诊:系统评价。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Feb 10;20(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01375-1.
4
Direct and indirect pathways between low income status and becoming a high-cost health care user in Ontario, Canada: a mediation analysis of health risk behaviors.加拿大安大略省低社会经济地位与成为高医疗费用使用者之间的直接和间接途径:健康风险行为的中介分析。
Ann Epidemiol. 2020 Nov;51:28-34.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2020.07.006. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
5
The role of health literacy in explaining the association between educational attainment and the use of out-of-hours primary care services in chronically ill people: a survey study.健康素养在解释慢性病患者教育程度与非工作时间初级保健服务利用之间关联中的作用:一项调查研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 May 31;18(1):394. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3197-4.
6
Exploring the differences in general practitioner and health care specialist utilization according to education, occupation, income and social networks across Europe: findings from the European social survey (2014) special module on the social determinants of health.探索欧洲各地根据教育程度、职业、收入和社会网络划分的全科医生和医疗保健专家使用情况的差异:来自欧洲社会调查(2014年)健康社会决定因素特别模块的研究结果。
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Feb 1;27(suppl_1):73-81. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw255.
7
Patient-centred access to health care: conceptualising access at the interface of health systems and populations.以患者为中心的医疗保健获取途径:在卫生系统和人群的交叉点上构想获取途径。
Int J Equity Health. 2013 Mar 11;12:18. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-12-18.
8
Socioeconomic differences in healthcare utilization, with and without adjustment for need: an example from Stockholm, Sweden.社会经济差异对医疗保健利用的影响,以及是否根据需要进行调整:来自瑞典斯德哥尔摩的一个例子。
Scand J Public Health. 2013 May;41(3):318-25. doi: 10.1177/1403494812473205. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
9
Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement.评估患病率研究中的偏倚风险:现有工具的修改和评价者间一致性的证据。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Sep;65(9):934-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.11.014. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
10
Inequalities in utilisation of general practitioner and specialist services in 9 European countries.9 个欧洲国家中普通科医生和专科医生服务利用的不平等。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Oct 31;11:288. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-288.