• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

言语流畅性的聚类和转换:对照组与脑损伤个体的比较。

Clustering and switching in verbal fluency: a comparison between control and individuals with brain damage.

机构信息

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Distúrbios da Comunicação Humana, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria - UFSM, Santa Maria (RS), Brasil.

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS, Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil.

出版信息

Codas. 2021 Nov 22;34(2):e20200365. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20212020365. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1590/2317-1782/20212020365
PMID:34816946
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9769432/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to analyze and compare the performance and strategies used by control subjects and patients with unilateral brain damage on phonemic and semantic Verbal Fluency tasks.

METHODS

The sample consisted of 104 participants divided into four groups (26 with left hemisphere damage and aphasia- LHDa, 28 with left hemisphere damage and no aphasia- LHDna, 25 with right hemisphere damage- RHD and 25 neurologically healthy control subjects). All participants were administered the phonemic ("M" letter-based) and semantic (animals) verbal fluency tasks from the Montreal-Toulouse Language Assessment Battery (MTL-BR).

RESULTS

Patients in the LHDa group showed the worst performance (fewer words produced, fewer clusters and switches) in both types of fluency task. RHD group showed fewer switching productions when compared with controls and LHDna had fewer words productions than controls in the first 30 seconds block.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the LHDa group obtained lower scores in most measures of SVF and PVF when compared to the other groups.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在分析和比较单侧脑损伤患者和对照组在音位和语义流畅性任务中的表现和策略。

方法

样本由 104 名参与者组成,分为四组(26 名左侧大脑损伤伴失语症- LHDa、28 名左侧大脑损伤无失语症- LHDna、25 名右侧大脑损伤- RHD 和 25 名神经健康对照组)。所有参与者都接受了来自蒙特利尔-图卢兹语言评估电池(MTL-BR)的音位(基于“M”字母)和语义(动物)流畅性任务。

结果

LHDa 组在两种流畅性任务中的表现最差(产生的单词较少,簇和转换较少)。与对照组相比,RHD 组在转换生成方面较少,而在最初的 30 秒组中,LHDna 产生的单词比对照组少。

结论

与其他组相比,LHDa 组在大多数 SVF 和 PVF 测量中得分较低。

相似文献

1
Clustering and switching in verbal fluency: a comparison between control and individuals with brain damage.言语流畅性的聚类和转换:对照组与脑损伤个体的比较。
Codas. 2021 Nov 22;34(2):e20200365. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20212020365. eCollection 2021.
2
Verbal fluency difficulties in aphasia: A combination of lexical and executive control deficits.失语症中的言语流畅性障碍:词汇和执行控制缺陷的组合。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 May;57(3):593-614. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12710. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
3
Semantic fluency in aphasia: clustering and switching in the course of 1 minute.失语症中的语义流畅性:1分钟内的聚类与转换
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2017 May;52(3):334-345. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12276. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
4
Clustering and switching strategies in verbal fluency tasks: comparison between schizophrenics and healthy adults.言语流畅性任务中的聚类与转换策略:精神分裂症患者与健康成年人的比较
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1998 Nov;4(6):539-46. doi: 10.1017/s1355617798466025.
5
Lexical factors and cerebral regions influencing verbal fluency performance in MCI.影响 MCI 患者言语流畅性表现的词汇因素和大脑区域。
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Feb;54:98-111. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.12.010. Epub 2013 Dec 30.
6
Verbal fluency in Huntington's disease: a longitudinal analysis of phonemic and semantic clustering and switching.亨廷顿舞蹈症中的语言流畅性:音素和语义聚类及转换的纵向分析
Neuropsychologia. 2002;40(8):1277-84. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00217-2.
7
Comparison of animal, action and phonemic fluency in aphasia.失语症中动物、动作和音素流畅性的比较。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2018 Mar;53(2):370-384. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12354. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
8
Component analysis of verbal fluency performance in younger participants with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.中度至重度创伤性脑损伤年轻参与者言语流畅性表现的成分分析
Brain Inj. 2014;28(4):456-64. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2014.896945. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
9
Verbal fluency in right brain damage: dissociations among production criteria and duration.右脑损伤中的言语流畅性:生成标准与持续时间之间的分离
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2014;21(4):260-8. doi: 10.1080/09084282.2013.802693. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
10
Qualitative analysis of verbal fluency in depression.抑郁症言语流畅性的定性分析
Psychiatry Res. 2003 Jan 25;117(1):17-24. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1781(02)00300-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Mechanisms of Verbal Fluency Impairment in Stroke: Insights From "Strategic Indices" Derived From a Study of 337 Patients.中风患者语言流畅性受损的机制:来自对337例患者研究得出的“策略指标”的见解
Eur J Neurosci. 2025 Mar;61(5):e70022. doi: 10.1111/ejn.70022.
2
Leveraging relatedness-based measures in people with language disorders: A scoping review.在语言障碍患者中利用基于关联性的测量方法:一项范围综述。
J Neuropsychol. 2025 Jun;19(2):299-337. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12405. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
3
Longitudinal changes in qualitative aspects of semantic fluency in presymptomatic and prodromal genetic frontotemporal dementia.症状前和前驱性遗传性额颞叶痴呆语义流畅性定性方面的纵向变化。
J Neurol. 2023 Nov;270(11):5418-5435. doi: 10.1007/s00415-023-11845-5. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
4
Executive functions in primary progressive aphasia: A meta-analysis.原发性进行性失语症中的执行功能:一项荟萃分析。
Cortex. 2022 Dec;157:304-322. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.10.001. Epub 2022 Oct 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Clustering and Switching Patterns in Semantic Fluency and Their Relationship to Working Memory in Mild Cognitive Impairment.轻度认知障碍中语义流畅性的聚类与转换模式及其与工作记忆的关系
Dement Neurocogn Disord. 2019 Jun;18(2):47-61. doi: 10.12779/dnd.2019.18.2.47. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
2
Semantic fluency in aphasia: clustering and switching in the course of 1 minute.失语症中的语义流畅性:1分钟内的聚类与转换
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2017 May;52(3):334-345. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12276. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
3
[The language area of the brain: a functional reassessment].[大脑的语言区域:功能再评估]
Rev Neurol. 2016 Feb 1;62(3):97-106.
4
Cognitive deficits in post-stroke aphasia.中风后失语症中的认知缺陷。
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2015 Oct;73(10):840-7. doi: 10.1590/0004-282X20150133.
5
Montreal-Toulouse Language Assessment Battery: evidence of criterion validity from patients with aphasia.蒙特利尔-图卢兹语言评估量表:失语症患者的效标效度证据
J Neurol Sci. 2015 Oct 15;357(1-2):246-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.07.045. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
6
Verbal fluency, clustering, and switching in patients with psychosis following traumatic brain injury (PFTBI).创伤性脑损伤后精神病患者的言语流畅性、聚类和转换(PFTBI)。
Psychiatry Res. 2015 Jun 30;227(2-3):152-9. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.03.040. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
7
What do verbal fluency tasks measure? Predictors of verbal fluency performance in older adults.言语流畅性任务测量什么?老年人言语流畅性表现的预测因素。
Front Psychol. 2014 Jul 22;5:772. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00772. eCollection 2014.
8
Montreal-Toulouse language assessment battery for aphasia: validity and reliability evidence.蒙特利尔 - 图卢兹失语症语言评估量表:效度与信度证据
NeuroRehabilitation. 2014;34(3):463-71. doi: 10.3233/NRE-141057.
9
Animal Verbal Fluency and Design Fluency in school-aged children: effects of age, sex, and mean level of parental education, and regression-based normative data.学龄儿童的动物流畅度和设计流畅度:年龄、性别、父母平均受教育程度的影响,以及基于回归的常模数据。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2011 Nov;33(9):1005-15. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2011.589509. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
10
Component analysis of verbal fluency in patients with mild traumatic brain injury.轻度创伤性脑损伤患者言语流畅性的成分分析。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2011 Aug;33(7):785-92. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2011.558496. Epub 2011 Jun 24.