Department of Biomedical Engineering, 12442Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
School of Medicine, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
Trends Hear. 2021 Jan-Dec;25:23312165211059628. doi: 10.1177/23312165211059628.
Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) can be useful tools for assessing cochlear function noninvasively. However, there is a lack of reports describing their utility in predicting hearing capabilities. Data for model training were collected from 245 and 839 ears with normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss, respectively. Based on SFOAEs, this study developed an objective assessment system consisting of three mutually independent modules, with the routine test module and the fast test module used for threshold prediction and the hearing screening module for identifying hearing loss. Results evaluated via cross-validation show that the routine test module and the fast test module predict hearing thresholds with similar performance from 0.5 to 8 kHz, with mean absolute errors of 7.06-11.61 dB for the routine module and of 7.40-12.60 dB for the fast module. However, the fast module involves less test time than is needed in the routine module. The hearing screening module identifies hearing status with a large area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.912-0.985), high accuracy (88.4-95.9%), and low false negative rate (2.9-7.0%) at 0.5-8 kHz. The three modules are further validated on unknown data, and the results are similar to those obtained through cross-validation, indicating these modules can be well generalized to new data. Both the routine module and fast module are potential tools for predicting hearing thresholds. However, their prediction performance in ears with hearing loss requires further improvement to facilitate their clinical utility. The hearing screening module shows promise as a clinical tool for identifying hearing loss.
刺激频率耳声发射(SFOAEs)可作为一种非侵入性评估耳蜗功能的有用工具。然而,目前缺乏关于其在预测听力能力方面应用的报道。本研究的数据来源于分别具有正常听力和感音神经性听力损失的 245 只和 839 只耳朵。基于 SFOAEs,本研究开发了一个由三个相互独立的模块组成的客观评估系统,其中常规测试模块和快速测试模块用于预测阈值,而听力筛查模块则用于识别听力损失。通过交叉验证评估结果表明,常规测试模块和快速测试模块在 0.5-8 kHz 范围内对听力阈值的预测性能相似,常规模块的平均绝对误差为 7.06-11.61 dB,快速模块的平均绝对误差为 7.40-12.60 dB。然而,快速模块的测试时间比常规模块更短。听力筛查模块在 0.5-8 kHz 范围内识别听力状态的受试者工作特征曲线下面积较大(0.912-0.985),准确率较高(88.4%-95.9%),假阴性率较低(2.9%-7.0%)。在未知数据上进一步验证了这三个模块,结果与交叉验证结果相似,表明这些模块可以很好地推广到新数据。常规模块和快速模块均有可能成为预测听力阈值的工具。然而,它们在听力损失耳朵中的预测性能需要进一步提高,以促进其临床应用。听力筛查模块有望成为识别听力损失的临床工具。