To patch or not to patch acute isolated traumatic tympanic membrane perforations: a case series and systematic literature review.

OBJECTIVE

To date, there is no consensus about the benefits of paper patching over spontaneous healing in the management of isolated acute traumatic tympanic membrane perforations (IATTMP). In this systematic literature review and case series, we compared paper patching of IATTMP to spontaneous healing in terms of healing rate and time to heal.

DATABASES REVIEWED

A systematic literature search of English-language studies published from 1/1975 to 9/2020 was conducted using PubMed via MEDLINE, and 201 studies were identified. Another 346 studies were derived from the references of those articles. Twenty-four studies remained after omitting duplications and articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria.

METHODS

Demographics, medical history, physical examination, and audiometric results in the selected publications and in a new series of patients treated for IATTMP between 1/2018 and 1/2021 in a single tertiary referral center were retrieved and analyzed.

RESULTS

The literature review yielded 2796 ears of which 466 underwent paper patching (intervention arm). Complete perforation healing was documented in 67-97% of control arm and 92-93% of intervention arm. Our new series included 29 ears of which six underwent paper patching. Complete healing was observed in 83% and 78% in the interventional and control arms, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although paper patching and watchful waiting had similar success rates in patients with IATTMP, healing after paper patching was slightly quicker among our patients. Patching is a readily applicable and technically simple office-based intervention that should be preferentially considered for IATTMP.