Martino Davide, Malaty Irene, Müller-Vahl Kirsten, Nosratmirshekarlou Elaheh, Pringsheim Tamara M, Shprecher David, Ganos Christos
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023 May;32(5):859-872. doi: 10.1007/s00787-021-01920-5. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
A standardized definition of treatment failure in the management of tics is currently lacking. Such definition would prevent persistent use of unnecessary interventions and help clinicians to determine when to offer less established treatments (e.g., deep brain stimulation surgery). To achieve an expert consensus-based definition of failure of medical treatments for tics, we used a multi-step, multi-round, web-based Delphi approach involving international specialist clinicians with specific expertise in tic disorders. These experts were identified through professional networks or consortia related to chronic tic disorders. We created a survey and reviewed the questions with stakeholders prior to two rounds of Delphi surveys, followed by a final review and discussion among research team members. Both survey rounds were completed using a sample of 36 expert stakeholders from 14 countries, including neurologists, psychiatrists, and clinical psychologists. The Delphi process led to consensus on 10 statements which formed the final definition of treatment failure. The definition was structured and operationalized according to two separate sections, one for behavioral and one for pharmacological treatments. Core components of the definition and its operationalization included lack of efficacy, adherence, and tolerability, as well as a definition of failure of behavioral therapies as a whole, and of pharmacological therapies as a whole. The group concluded that the components of this specific definition reflect the range and complexity of characteristics to consider in establishing tic-related treatment failure. Future research should assess the feasibility of this operational definition and whether it will change clinical decision-making and improve management outcomes.
目前,抽动症管理中治疗失败的标准化定义尚不存在。这样的定义将避免不必要干预的持续使用,并帮助临床医生确定何时提供较新的治疗方法(例如,脑深部刺激手术)。为了达成基于专家共识的抽动症药物治疗失败定义,我们采用了多步骤、多轮次、基于网络的德尔菲法,涉及在抽动症疾病方面具有特定专业知识的国际专家临床医生。这些专家是通过与慢性抽动症疾病相关的专业网络或联盟确定的。在两轮德尔菲调查之前,我们创建了一项调查并与利益相关者一起审查了问题,随后研究团队成员进行了最终审查和讨论。两轮调查均采用来自14个国家的36名专家利益相关者的样本完成,包括神经科医生、精神科医生和临床心理学家。德尔菲法促成了关于10项陈述的共识,这些陈述构成了治疗失败的最终定义。该定义根据两个单独的部分进行构建和实施,一个用于行为治疗,一个用于药物治疗。定义及其实施的核心组成部分包括缺乏疗效、依从性和耐受性,以及行为疗法整体失败和药物疗法整体失败的定义。该小组得出结论认为,这一特定定义的组成部分反映了在确定与抽动症相关的治疗失败时需要考虑的特征范围和复杂性。未来的研究应评估这一操作性定义的可行性,以及它是否会改变临床决策并改善管理结果。