Hardie Rae-Anne, Sezgin Gorkem, Imai Chisato, Gault Emma, McGuire Precious, Sheikh Muhammad Kashif, Pearce Christopher, Badrick Tony, Georgiou Andrew
Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW, Australia
Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW, Australia.
BJGP Open. 2022 Mar 22;6(1). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0123. Print 2022 Mar.
Since the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic on 11 March 2020, health technologies have been rapidly scaled up to ensure access to care. A significant innovation has been telehealth in general practice. Now widespread, it remains unknown how this shift to virtual care has impacted on quality-of-care indicators such as pathology testing and diagnosis.
To undertake a comparison of telehealth and face-to-face general practice consultations to: identify if there were differences in the proportion of pathology test referrals from 2019-2020; and quantify any change in pathology test collection and follow-up patterns.
DESIGN & SETTING: Retrospective observational study of routinely collected electronic patient data from 807 general practices across New South Wales (NSW) and Victoria, Australia.
Multivariate generalised estimating equation models were used to estimate the proportion of pathology test referrals for overall, face-to-face, and telehealth consultations. Pathology test follow-up was described through median (and interquartile range [IQR]) time.
Pathology test referrals declined during periods of high COVID-19 cases, falling from 10.8% in February 2020 to a low of 4.5% during the first peak in April. Overall, pathology test referrals were lower for telehealth than face-to-face consultations. Median time between referral and test collection was 3 days (IQR 1-14) for telehealth and 1 day (IQR 0-7) for face to face.
For telehealth to become part of routine care, it is crucial that gaps in functionality, including difficulty in test referral processes, be addressed. Quality improvements supporting care practices will ensure clinicians' workflows are supported and patients receive diagnostic testing.
自世界卫生组织于2020年3月11日宣布新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)为大流行病以来,卫生技术已迅速扩大规模以确保获得医疗服务。基层医疗中的远程医疗是一项重大创新。如今它已广泛应用,但向虚拟医疗的这种转变如何影响诸如病理检查和诊断等医疗质量指标仍不明确。
对远程医疗和面对面基层医疗咨询进行比较,以:确定2019 - 2020年病理检查转诊比例是否存在差异;并量化病理检查采集和后续模式的任何变化。
对从澳大利亚新南威尔士州(NSW)和维多利亚州的807家基层医疗诊所常规收集的电子患者数据进行回顾性观察研究。
使用多变量广义估计方程模型来估计总体、面对面和远程医疗咨询的病理检查转诊比例。通过中位数(和四分位间距[IQR])时间来描述病理检查的后续情况。
在COVID - 19病例高发期,病理检查转诊量下降,从2020年2月的10.8%降至4月首个高峰时的低至4.5%。总体而言,远程医疗的病理检查转诊率低于面对面咨询。远程医疗转诊与检查采集之间的中位时间为3天(IQR 1 - 14),面对面为1天(IQR 0 - 7)。
为使远程医疗成为常规医疗的一部分,解决功能上的差距(包括检查转诊过程中的困难)至关重要。支持医疗实践的质量改进将确保临床医生的工作流程得到支持,患者能够接受诊断检查。