Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚全科医疗中 COVID-19 大流行期间面对面咨询与远程医疗咨询中的药物处方:一项回顾性观察研究。

Medication prescribing in face-to-face versus telehealth consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australian general practice: a retrospective observational study.

作者信息

Wabe Nasir, Thomas Judith, Sezgin Gorkem, Sheikh Muhammad Kashif, Gault Emma, Georgiou Andrew

机构信息

Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia

Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia.

出版信息

BJGP Open. 2022 Mar 22;6(1). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0132. Print 2022 Mar.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There has been a precipitous rise in telehealth use in general practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding differences between face-to-face and telehealth consulting is an important component for planning the future use of telehealth services beyond the pandemic. However, there is limited evidence on whether telehealth consulting impacts medication prescribing under pandemic circumstances.

AIM

To compare medication prescribing in face-to-face consultations with telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australian general practice.

DESIGN & SETTING: A multisite, retrospective observational study. De-identified routinely collected electronic health data were used, which were extracted from 806 general practices in Victoria and New South Wales (NSW), Australia, between April and December 2020.

METHOD

The primary outcome measure was whether at least one medication was prescribed following a telehealth or face-to-face consultation. Data were reported by medication and for each of the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system level 1 groups. The secondary outcome measure was first-time prescribing. Telehealth included both telephone and video consultations.

RESULTS

A total of 13 608 216 consultations satisfied the inclusion criteria (61.0% face to face and 39.0% telehealth). Most telehealth consultations were conducted via telephone (97.8%). Overall, 39.3% of face-to-face and 33.0% of telehealth consultations prescribed at least one medication, which is a statistically significant difference (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.379 to 1.381). The prescribing rate was greater for face-to-face versus telehealth consultations for all drug groups except ATC level 1N (nervous system).

CONCLUSION

Under COVID-19 restrictions in the states of Victoria and NSW, Australia, medication prescribing was higher in face-to-face consultations when compared with telehealth consultations in the study population.

摘要

背景

在新冠疫情期间,远程医疗在全科医疗中的使用急剧增加。了解面对面咨询和远程医疗咨询之间的差异是规划疫情后远程医疗服务未来使用的重要组成部分。然而,关于疫情期间远程医疗咨询是否会影响药物处方的证据有限。

目的

比较澳大利亚全科医疗中新冠疫情期间面对面咨询和远程医疗咨询中的药物处方情况。

设计与背景

一项多地点回顾性观察研究。使用了经过去识别处理的常规收集的电子健康数据,这些数据于2020年4月至12月从澳大利亚维多利亚州和新南威尔士州(NSW)的806家全科诊所提取。

方法

主要结局指标是远程医疗或面对面咨询后是否至少开具了一种药物。数据按药物以及解剖治疗化学(ATC)分类系统1级各分组进行报告。次要结局指标是首次处方。远程医疗包括电话和视频咨询。

结果

共有13608216次咨询符合纳入标准(61.0%为面对面咨询,39.0%为远程医疗咨询)。大多数远程医疗咨询通过电话进行(97.8%)。总体而言,39.3%的面对面咨询和33.0%的远程医疗咨询开具了至少一种药物,这在统计学上有显著差异(调整后的优势比[OR]为1.38,95%置信区间[CI]=1.379至1.381)。除ATC 1N级(神经系统)外,所有药物组面对面咨询的处方率均高于远程医疗咨询。

结论

在澳大利亚维多利亚州和新南威尔士州的新冠疫情限制措施下,研究人群中面对面咨询的药物处方率高于远程医疗咨询。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验