Imai Chisato, Thomas Judith, Hardie Rae-Anne, Pearce Christopher, Badrick Tony, Georgiou Andrew
Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia.
BJGP Open. 2022 Sep 28;6(3). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0200. Print 2022 Sep.
The Australian government introduced temporary government-subsidised telehealth service items (phone and video-conference) in mid-March 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The uptake of telehealth by patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) for consulting with GPs is unknown.
To evaluate the uptake of telehealth consultations and associated patient characteristics in Australian general practice, including the frequency of haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) tests and change in HbA1c levels by telehealth use, compared with guideline recommendations.
DESIGN & SETTING: This exploratory study used electronic patient data from approximately 800 general practices in Victoria and New South Wales (NSW), Australia. A pre-COVID-19 period from March 2019-February 2020 was compared with a pandemic period from March 2020-February 2021. Patients diagnosed with T2DM before March 2018 were included.
Telehealth uptake patterns were examined overall and by patient characteristics. Generalised estimating equation models were used to examine patient probability of 6-monthly HbA1c testing and change in HbA1c levels, comparing between patients who did and patients who did not use telehealth.
Of 57 916 patients, 80.8% had telehealth consultations during the pandemic period. Telehealth consultations were positively associated with patients with T2DM who were older, female, had chronic kidney disease (CKD), prescribed antidiabetic medications, and living in remote areas. No significant difference was found in 6-monthly HbA1c testing and HbA1c levels between telehealth users and patients who had face-to-face consultations only.
Telehealth GP consultations were well utilised by patients with T2DM. Diabetes monitoring care via telehealth is as effective as face-to-face consultations.
澳大利亚政府于2020年3月中旬推出了临时政府补贴的远程医疗服务项目(电话和视频会议),以应对新冠疫情。2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者通过远程医疗咨询全科医生的情况尚不清楚。
评估澳大利亚全科医疗中远程医疗咨询的使用情况及相关患者特征,包括糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)检测频率以及与指南建议相比,远程医疗使用导致的HbA1c水平变化。
这项探索性研究使用了来自澳大利亚维多利亚州和新南威尔士州(NSW)约800家全科诊所的电子患者数据。将2019年3月至2020年2月的新冠疫情前时期与2020年3月至2021年2月的疫情时期进行比较。纳入2018年3月前被诊断为T2DM的患者。
总体及按患者特征检查远程医疗使用模式。使用广义估计方程模型检查每6个月进行HbA1c检测的患者概率以及HbA1c水平变化,比较使用和未使用远程医疗的患者。
在57916名患者中,80.8%在疫情期间进行了远程医疗咨询。远程医疗咨询与年龄较大、女性、患有慢性肾病(CKD)、正在服用抗糖尿病药物且居住在偏远地区的T2DM患者呈正相关。远程医疗使用者与仅进行面对面咨询的患者在每6个月HbA1c检测及HbA1c水平方面未发现显著差异。
T2DM患者充分利用了全科医生的远程医疗咨询。通过远程医疗进行糖尿病监测护理与面对面咨询一样有效。