• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英格兰和威尔士安全及法医心理健康服务的总体性质

The Totalising Nature of Secure and Forensic Mental Health Services in England and Wales.

作者信息

Markham Sarah

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 8;12:789089. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.789089. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.789089
PMID:34819890
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8606637/
Abstract

This evidence-based opinion piece explores the totalising risk averse nature of secure and forensic mental health services and associated iatrogenic harms in England and Wales. Drawing on the research literature I consider the various influences, both external and internal which impact on the provision of such services and how both the therapeutic alliance and recovery potential for patients may be improved. Especial attention is paid to the deployment of restrictive practise, practitioner attitudes, the potential for non-thinking, and how these may impact on decision-making and the care and treatment of mentally disordered offenders.

摘要

这篇基于证据的观点文章探讨了英格兰和威尔士安全及法医精神健康服务中普遍存在的规避风险的性质以及相关的医源性伤害。借鉴研究文献,我考虑了影响此类服务提供的各种内外部因素,以及如何改善治疗联盟和患者的康复潜力。特别关注了限制性措施的使用、从业者态度、不假思索的可能性,以及这些因素如何影响决策以及对精神错乱罪犯的护理和治疗。

相似文献

1
The Totalising Nature of Secure and Forensic Mental Health Services in England and Wales.英格兰和威尔士安全及法医心理健康服务的总体性质
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 8;12:789089. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.789089. eCollection 2021.
2
Corrigendum: The totalising nature of secure and forensic mental health services in England and Wales.勘误:英格兰和威尔士安全及法医精神卫生服务的汇总性质。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 19;15:1434728. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1434728. eCollection 2024.
3
The omnipresence of risk and associated harms in secure and forensic mental health services in England and Wales.英格兰和威尔士安全及法医精神健康服务中风险及相关危害的普遍存在。
Soc Theory Health. 2021 Jun 16:1-17. doi: 10.1057/s41285-021-00167-z.
4
Community forensic psychiatric services in England and Wales.英格兰和威尔士的社区法医精神病服务。
CNS Spectr. 2020 Oct;25(5):604-617. doi: 10.1017/S1092852919001743. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
5
Predicting admission rates to secure forensic psychiatry services.预测获得法医精神病学服务的住院率。
Psychol Med. 2001 Apr;31(3):531-9. doi: 10.1017/s003329170100366x.
6
Trends in the number of restricted patients in England and Wales 2003-2016: Implications for forensic psychiatry services.2003 - 2016年英格兰和威尔士受限患者数量趋势:对法医精神病学服务的影响。
Med Sci Law. 2019 Jan;59(1):42-48. doi: 10.1177/0025802419825596. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
7
Long-stay in forensic-psychiatric care in the UK.在英国接受长期法医精神病学护理。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2018 Mar;53(3):313-321. doi: 10.1007/s00127-017-1473-y. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
8
European Psychiatric Association (EPA) guidance on forensic psychiatry: Evidence based assessment and treatment of mentally disordered offenders.欧洲精神病学协会(EPA)法医精神病学指南:精神障碍罪犯的循证评估和治疗。
Eur Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;51:58-73. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.12.007. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
9
Diversion of Mentally Ill Offenders from the Criminal Justice System in Ireland: Comparison with England and Wales.爱尔兰将精神病罪犯从刑事司法系统中转移出来的情况:与英格兰和威尔士的比较。
Ir Med J. 2018 Mar 14;111(3):719.
10
Clinical Ethics Support Services Are Not as Well-Established in Forensic Psychiatry as in General Psychiatry.临床伦理支持服务在法医精神病学领域不如在普通精神病学领域那样完善。
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 13;11:186. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00186. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Building capacity in patient-oriented research: reflections on cultivating relationships within a high-secure forensic mental health hospital.建设以患者为导向的研究能力:对在高度戒备的法医精神卫生医院中培养关系的思考。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Mar 6;11(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00691-6.
2
Determinants of readiness to implement forensic patient-oriented research: a study of barriers and facilitators in a high-secure hospital.实施以法医患者为导向研究的准备因素:一项关于高度戒备医院中障碍与促进因素的研究
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 15;15:1509946. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1509946. eCollection 2024.
3
'If one doesn't happen, the other will': forensic mental health service patients' experiences of co-occurring self-harm and aggression.“若其一未发生,另一则会发生”:法医精神卫生服务患者同时出现自我伤害和攻击行为的经历
BJPsych Open. 2025 Jan 22;11(1):e20. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2024.834.
4
Quality of life, wellbeing, recovery, and progress for older forensic mental health patients: a qualitative investigation based on the perspectives of patients and staff.老年法医精神健康患者的生活质量、幸福感、康复和进展:基于患者和工作人员观点的定性研究。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2023 Dec;18(1):2202978. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2023.2202978.
5
"You Want Them Pretty, but Not Too Intelligent!": Everyday Talk and the Continuum of Men's Violence Against Women in Forensic Institutional Care.“你希望她们漂亮,但不要太聪明!”:法医机构护理中关于男性对女性暴力行为的日常谈话与连续体
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 6;13:886444. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.886444. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Patients' Views With Regard to Personal Recovery in Forensic Psychiatry in German-Speaking Switzerland-An Explorative Study.瑞士德语区法医精神病学中患者对个人康复的看法——一项探索性研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 1;12:695096. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.695096. eCollection 2021.
2
Collaborative risk assessment in secure and forensic mental health settings in the UK.英国安全及法医精神卫生环境中的协作风险评估。
Gen Psychiatr. 2020 Aug 19;33(5):e100291. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2020-100291. eCollection 2020.
3
Freedom Restrictive Coercive Measures in Forensic Psychiatry.法医精神病学中的自由限制与强制手段
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 5;11:146. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00146. eCollection 2020.
4
Closing the gap between rhetoric and practice in strengths-based approaches to Indigenous public health: a qualitative study.基于优势的原住民公共卫生方法在理论与实践之间的差距:一项定性研究。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2020 Apr;44(2):102-105. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12953. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
5
An Interview Study of Professional Carers' Experiences of Supporting Patient Participation in a Maximum Security Forensic Psychiatric Setting.专业护理人员支持患者参与最高安全级别法医精神病学环境的经验访谈研究。
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Mar;41(3):201-210. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2019.1658833. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
6
Effects of Seclusion and Restraint in Adult Psychiatry: A Systematic Review.成人精神病学中隔离与约束的影响:一项系统综述。
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Jul 16;10:491. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00491. eCollection 2019.
7
Perceived Institutional Restraint Is Associated With Psychological Distress in Forensic Psychiatric Inpatients.感知到的机构限制与法医精神病住院患者的心理困扰有关。
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Jun 11;10:410. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00410. eCollection 2019.
8
Shared Risk Formulation in Forensic Psychiatry.法医精神病学中的共同风险制定。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2019 Mar;47(1):22-28. doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.003813-19. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
9
Alternatives to Compulsory Detention and Treatment and Coercive Practices in Mental Health Settings.心理健康环境中强制拘留与治疗及强制手段的替代方案。
J Law Med. 2018 Dec;26(2):300-305.
10
Co-creation of the Safewards Model in a Forensic Mental Health Care Facility.在一家法医精神卫生保健机构中共同创建安全保障模式。
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Jan;40(1):2-7. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2018.1481472. Epub 2018 Aug 1.